Attention: The information on this website is currently out of date and should not be relied upon..

Care Services

carehome, nursing and medical services directory


16/17 Kestrel Business Park, Kestrel Business Park, Kestrel Way, Sowton Industrial Estate, Exeter.

16/17 Kestrel Business Park in Kestrel Business Park, Kestrel Way, Sowton Industrial Estate, Exeter is a Ambulance specialising in the provision of services relating to services for everyone, transport services, triage and medical advice provided remotely and treatment of disease, disorder or injury. The last inspection date here was 9th August 2018

16/17 Kestrel Business Park is managed by First Care Ambulance Limited.

Contact Details:

    Address:
      16/17 Kestrel Business Park
      Unit 16-17
      Kestrel Business Park
      Kestrel Way
      Sowton Industrial Estate
      Exeter
      EX2 7JS
      United Kingdom
    Telephone:
      01392438522
    Website:

Ratings:

For a guide to the ratings, click here.

Safe: No Rating / Under Appeal / Rating Suspended
Effective: No Rating / Under Appeal / Rating Suspended
Caring: No Rating / Under Appeal / Rating Suspended
Responsive: No Rating / Under Appeal / Rating Suspended
Well-Led: No Rating / Under Appeal / Rating Suspended
Overall: No Rating / Under Appeal / Rating Suspended

Further Details:

Important Dates:

    Last Inspection 2018-08-09
    Last Published 2018-08-09

Local Authority:

    Devon

Link to this page:

    HTML   BBCode

Inspection Reports:

Click the title bar on any of the report introductions below to read the full entry. If there is a PDF icon, click it to download the full report.

1st January 1970 - During a routine inspection pdf icon

First Care Ambulance is operated by First Care Ambulance Limited and provides patient transport services.

We inspected this service using our comprehensive inspection methodology. We carried out the announced part of the inspection on 17 and 18 April 2018.

To get to the heart of patients’ experiences of care and treatment, we ask the same five questions of all services: are they safe, effective, caring, responsive to people's needs, and well-led?

Throughout the inspection, we took account of what people told us and how the provider understood and complied with the Mental Capacity Act 2005.

The main service provided by this service was patient transport.

Services we do not rate

We regulate independent ambulance services but at the time of the inspection we did not have a legal duty to rate them. We highlight good practice and issues that service providers need to improve and take regulatory action as necessary.

We found the following areas of good practice:

  • There were strong, comprehensive and embedded systems, processes and procedures to keep people safe.
  • The environment was secure and suitable for safe storage of ambulances and equipment.
  • Patient care was at the centre of everything the organisation and staff did.
  • Patient’s individual needs and preferences were central to the planning and delivery of the service.
  • There was a commitment from frontline staff and senior managers to provide a high-quality service for patients with a continual drive to improve the delivery of care.
  • The organisation had a flexible and responsive approach and had developed a positive partnership with commissioners.
  • The registered manager and the management team were committed to the patients who used the service, as well as to staff.

However, we also found the following issues that the service provider needs to improve:

  • The named professional responsible for safeguarding was not trained to level four for safeguarding in line with the recommendations in the intercollegiate document. ‘Safeguarding children and young people: roles and competencies for health care staff’ (2014).
  • Medicines were not administered and supplied with the correct legal authorisation of a patient group direction. Paramedics required a patient group direction to administer any prescription only medicine that was not on the exemption list.

Following this inspection, we told the provider that it must take some actions to comply with the regulations and that it should make other improvements, even though a regulation had not been breached, to help the service improve. We also issued the provider with two requirement notices that affected the service. Details are at the end of the report.

Amanda Stanford

Deputy Chief Inspector of Hospitals (South), on behalf of the Chief Inspector of Hospitals

 

 

Latest Additions: