Attention: The information on this website is currently out of date and should not be relied upon..

Care Services

carehome, nursing and medical services directory


Adlington House, Heaton Chapel, Stockport.

Adlington House in Heaton Chapel, Stockport is a Homecare agencies specialising in the provision of services relating to caring for adults over 65 yrs, caring for adults under 65 yrs, dementia, mental health conditions, personal care, physical disabilities and sensory impairments. The last inspection date here was 30th April 2019

Adlington House is managed by Methodist Homes who are also responsible for 123 other locations

Contact Details:

    Address:
      Adlington House
      Nelstrop Road
      Heaton Chapel
      Stockport
      SK4 5LT
      United Kingdom
    Telephone:
      01619750411

Ratings:

For a guide to the ratings, click here.

Safe: Good
Effective: Good
Caring: Good
Responsive: Good
Well-Led: Good
Overall: Good

Further Details:

Important Dates:

    Last Inspection 2019-04-30
    Last Published 2019-04-30

Local Authority:

    Stockport

Link to this page:

    HTML   BBCode

Inspection Reports:

Click the title bar on any of the report introductions below to read the full entry. If there is a PDF icon, click it to download the full report.

19th March 2019 - During a routine inspection

About the service:

Adlington House provides care and support to people living in specialist 'extra care' housing. Extra care housing is purpose-built or adapted single household accommodation in a shared site or building. The accommodation is bought and is the occupant's own home. People's care and housing are provided under separate contractual agreements. The purpose built three storey building, set in its own grounds, offers 52 self-contained retirement apartments. The building consists of two communal lounges, a communal garden, an activities room and a restaurant. The building also has staff facilities, including an on-site office and a staff room.

Not everyone living at Adlington House received a regulated activity. The Care Quality Commission (CQC) only inspects the service being received by people provided with ‘personal care’; help with tasks related to personal hygiene and eating. Where they do we also consider any wider social care provided. At the time of inspection 11 people living at Adlington House were receiving a regulated activity.

People’s experience of using this service:

We saw the service had received many compliments from people who used the service and their relatives. One compliment said, “We sincerely believe that the kindness and consideration shown to [person name] played a huge part in enabling her to hold onto her independence and self-respect, and to live out the last of her life in the safety and warmth of her own home.”

People were supported to understand how to keep safe and to raise concerns if abuse occurred. People continued to tell us they felt safe with their care and support.

People were supported to have maximum choice and control of their lives and staff supported them in the least restrictive way possible; the policies and systems in the service supported this practice.

People’s outcomes were consistently good, and people’s feedback confirmed this. One person told us, “I enjoy life here, this place has changed my life.”

The service worked with people’s social workers to ensure their needs were met, and professionals spoke positively about the service. People's needs were comprehensively assessed and regularly reviewed. People and families were involved in reviews.

We observed positive interactions between staff and people. Staff had good relationships with people and knew them well. Staff were seen to be caring towards people, and respected people's wishes.

People were supported to express their views. People we spoke with told us they had choices and were involved in making day to day decisions.

All the people we spoke with could tell us how to make a complaint but did not feel they needed to. One person remarked, “The staff are gentle, kind and pleasant and respect me as a person. They are all like that, I couldn't single anyone out good or bad. I have no complaints”.

The provider and registered manager followed governance systems which provided effective oversight and monitoring of the service.

The service continued to meet the characteristics of Good in all areas; more information is in the full report.

Rating at last inspection:

Good (report published 23 May 2016).

Why we inspected:

This was a planned inspection based on the rating at the last inspection. The service remained rated Good in all areas and Good overall.

Follow up:

We will continue to monitor intelligence we receive about the service until we return to visit as per our re-inspection programme. If any concerning information is received we may inspect sooner.

7th April 2016 - During a routine inspection pdf icon

This inspection took place on 7 and 8 April 2016 and was announced. The provider was given 48 hours notice. This is in line with our current guidance for inspecting domiciliary care services. This was the first inspection of the service since it was newly registered in July 2013.

Adlington House is registered to provide personal care to people who may require some help to maintain their independence. The purpose built three storey building, set in its own grounds, offers 52 self-contained retirement apartments. At the time of our inspection two apartments were shared by married couples and the rest were single occupancy.

The service provides care and support over a twenty four hour period. Staff can be called upon at any time to offer assistance to anyone living at Adlington House. People were able to purchase care packages to support them with their personal care. The service currently provided personal care support to seventeen people. All people who lived at Adlington House have access to an on-call system should they require assistance during the day or night. This service extended to those people living on site who had not purchased a care package with the service. If people’s needs changed they could call on staff who knew them and purchase additional care as needed. This meant that they could access support very quickly, and tailor that support to meet their needs.

In addition care staff would check on the welfare of all people living at Adlington House on a daily basis. The service also provides companionship, domestic support, a chaplain, handyman services and escorts for people, for example when attending hospital appointments.

Access to the building was secure, with key code entry and a buzzer with a screen linking visitors directly to the apartment they wished to visit. The main office was situated on the ground floor by the reception area, and there were also a hairdressing salon, a well-equipped spa room where people could be bathed by staff; activities room, and quiet lounges for people who use the service to meet or spend some peaceful time alone. An outside catering company ran a restaurant situated on the ground floor which was popular and well used by the people who used the service. There was also a ‘guest room’ where visitors could stay overnight or for longer periods if necessary.

The service had a registered manager. A registered manager is a person who has registered with the Care Quality Commission to manage the service. Like registered providers, they are ‘registered persons’. Registered persons have legal responsibility for meeting the requirements in the Health and Social Care Act 2008 and associated regulations about how the service is run.

People told us they felt safe and secure and that support was provided by caring staff whom they trusted. There were good and efficient monitoring systems in place to check the welfare of all the people who lived at Adlington House, and we were told by one person that staff will “notice if anything is out of the ordinary”.

We saw that there were enough well trained and competent staff to provide the level of support people required on a day-to-day basis. People we spoke with were complimentary about the staff. One person who used the service told us “The staff are all excellent. They know us, and they know what they’re doing. The perfect combination!” We saw records that showed that the staff were regularly supervised and had an annual appraisal, and were encouraged to seek learning opportunities with access to ongoing training.

There was a consistent staff team with low staff turnover. This meant that care was delivered to people who required support by knowledgeable care staff who knew them well, and knew how they liked their care to be delivered.

Staff demonstrated a good understanding of how to safeguard adults at risk of harm, and the service had a safeguarding policy which was up to date, in line with recent legislation and complemented the loc

 

 

Latest Additions: