Attention: The information on this website is currently out of date and should not be relied upon..

Care Services

carehome, nursing and medical services directory


Athol House - Care Home Physical Disabilities, Upper Norwood, London.

Athol House - Care Home Physical Disabilities in Upper Norwood, London is a Residential home specialising in the provision of services relating to accommodation for persons who require nursing or personal care, caring for adults over 65 yrs, caring for adults under 65 yrs and physical disabilities. The last inspection date here was 12th September 2018

Athol House - Care Home Physical Disabilities is managed by Leonard Cheshire Disability who are also responsible for 91 other locations

Contact Details:

    Address:
      Athol House - Care Home Physical Disabilities
      138 College Road
      Upper Norwood
      London
      SE19 1XE
      United Kingdom
    Telephone:
      02086703740
    Website:

Ratings:

For a guide to the ratings, click here.

Safe: Good
Effective: Good
Caring: Good
Responsive: Good
Well-Led: Good
Overall: Good

Further Details:

Important Dates:

    Last Inspection 2018-09-12
    Last Published 2018-09-12

Local Authority:

    Southwark

Link to this page:

    HTML   BBCode

Inspection Reports:

Click the title bar on any of the report introductions below to read the full entry. If there is a PDF icon, click it to download the full report.

24th April 2018 - During a routine inspection pdf icon

This inspection took place on 24 April 2018. Athol House accommodates 21 people living with a physical disability. The service is situated in a purpose built large building with a large communal area, bedrooms and bathrooms located on all floors. Athol House is a ‘care home’. People in care homes receive accommodation and nursing or personal care as single package under one contractual agreement. CQC regulates both the premises and the care provided, and both were looked at during this inspection. At the time of this inspection 21 people were living at the service.

At our last inspection we rated the service Good. At this inspection we found the service continued to meet the standards and the rating for the service remained Good. This inspection report is written in a shorter format because our overall rating of the service has not changed since our last inspection.

Athol House has a registered manager. A registered manager is a person who has registered with the Care Quality Commission to manage the service. Like registered providers, they are ‘registered persons’. Registered persons have legal responsibility for meeting the requirements in the Health and Social Care Act 2008 and associated Regulations about how the service is run.

There are established safeguarding processes in place at the service. Staff understood abuse and the actions to take to protect people from harm and abuse.

Staff assessed risks to people’s health and wellbeing. Risk management plans were developed to help staff understand those risks and the actions they should take to reduce them.

People’s medicines continued to be managed in a safe way. Staff used the systems in place for the safe administration, ordering and storage of medicines.

Infection control processes were in place at the service. Staff used personal protective equipment to help reduce the risk of infection for people. The service was clean, well maintained and adapted for people’s use.

There were enough members of staff on duty to care for people effectively. People had support from staff to attend social events when necessary. Staff had support through training, appraisal and supervision in their jobs.

People had support to have maximum choice and control of their life and staff supported them in the least restrictive way possible; the policies and systems in the service supported this practice. People had sufficient information so they could give staff consent to the care and support they received.

There was an onsite cook who prepared meals for people. People had choice in the meals they had and their individual nutritional needs and personal meal preferences were met.

People had access to health care services when their health care needs changed and when this was routinely required. Staff went with people to hospital appointments when needed.

People told us staff showed them compassion, kindness and were respectful. Staff spoke and cared for people in a dignified way that ensured their privacy was respected whilst they delivered care.

Assessments were completed with people and their relatives. These assessments placed people at the centre of their care and support, were person centred and used to record people’s needs. Assessments were used to develop a plan of care to ensure people’s needs continued to be met. Care plans detailed the support people required to meet their individual needs. People discussed their end of life care plans and their views and wishes were recorded.

People had access to a complaints system so they could make a complaint about any aspect of the service. The registered manager followed the registered provider’s complaints policy to ensure these were handled correctly.

The registered manager continued to ensure the service was regularly monitored and reviewed so it provided good quality care. Staff enjoyed working at the service and understood their role. The registered manager had an ‘open door’ policy and staff felt the registered man

2nd February 2016 - During a routine inspection pdf icon

Athol House provides accommodation and care for up to 21 people with physical disabilities. When we visited the home there were 21 people living there. The service was last inspected on 7 July 2014 when all of the regulations were met.

The service has a registered manager. A registered manager is a person who has registered with the Care Quality Commission to manage the service. Like registered providers, they are ‘registered persons’. Registered persons have legal responsibility for meeting the requirements in the Health and Social Care Act 2008 and associated Regulations about how the service is run.

We found that people who live at Athol House experienced a good quality of life as they were encouraged and supported to take part in activities they enjoyed. They had opportunities to meet people in the local area by going to community events and visiting local facilities. There were links with community groups and the home received visits from people who assisted by volunteering with activities.

There were good arrangements to keep people safe from harm at Athol House. Risks were managed well and people were protected from abuse. There were safe arrangements for dealing with emergencies. People received medicines as prescribed and they were managed safely.

Staff were trained and supported to do their work. They knew how to support people in line with the requirements of the Mental Capacity Act 2005 and ‘best interests’ meetings were held when people did not have the capacity to make their own decisions.

Staff were caring towards the people living at the home and they respected their privacy and dignity. Staff spent time getting to know people and agreeing how they could best support them in the way they wished.

People were supported to have their health needs met through contact with health care professionals and their advice was included in people’s care routines. Meals were prepared in line with people’s preferences and reflected the guidance given by health specialists.

People had opportunities to make their views known about the service and the staff made improvements in response.

There were effective management arrangements in the home. The provider monitored the service to make sure the care provided was high quality and shared good practice amongst services so standards developed and improved.

7th July 2014 - During a routine inspection pdf icon

A single inspector carried out this inspection. The focus of the inspection was to answer five key questions; is the service safe, effective, caring, responsive and well-led?

Below is a summary of what we found. The summary describes what people using the service, their relatives and the staff told us, what we observed and the records we looked at. We spoke with four people who used the service and three family members. We spoke with two senior care supervisors, two care workers, the activities coordinator, the health and safety officer and the maintenance supervisor. We also spoke to a speech and language therapist from the local Clinical Commissioning Group and a music therapist. We looked at five care records and six staff records.

If you want to see the evidence that supports our summary please read the full report.

Is the service safe?

People had been cared for in an environment that was safe, clean and hygienic. Equipment at the home had been well maintained and serviced regularly. There were enough staff on duty to meet the needs of the people living at the home and a member of the management team was available on call in case of emergencies. A person who used the service told us that “I feel safe here. Staff are good.” A care supervisor told us how “we monitor response rates to (call) bells very closely.” We subsequently noted that a bell was answered in less than one minute. We saw evidence that all staff had received safeguarding training and those with to whom we spoke with demonstrated a good understanding of the signs of abuse and were familiar with the safeguarding policy of the home.

CQC monitors the operation of the Deprivation of Liberty Safeguards which applies to care homes. While no applications have needed to be submitted, policies and procedures were in place to provide staff with guidance about legal requirements. Relevant staff have been trained to understand when an application should be made, and how to submit one.

Is the service effective?

People told us that they were happy with the care they received and felt their needs had been met. It was clear from what we saw and from speaking with staff that they understood people’s care and support needs and that they knew them well. One care worker told us how “I like to find a way to enable a person, rather than to see their disability as an obstacle.” A person who used the service showed us photographs and told us how they were supported by care staff to undertake a life changing event. They told us that “this made me the happiest person alive.” We saw on their records that staff had received training to meet the needs of the people living at the home.

Is the service caring?

People were supported by kind and attentive staff. We saw that care workers were patient and gave encouragement when supporting people. A family member told us how "staff have a genuine desire to do as much as possible for those who live here”. We observed how a care worker was mindful of a person’s dignity and discreetly asked them about their personal needs at that time. A senior care supervisor told us that the service was a home for life and that “if it is peoples’ wish to die here then we respect that and support them in whatever way possible.”

Is the service responsive?

A senior care supervisor told us that people’s needs had been assessed before they moved into the home unless it was an emergency admission. Records confirmed that people’s preferences, interests, aspirations and diverse needs had been recorded and care and support had been provided that met their wishes. People had access to activities that were important to them and had been supported to maintain relationships with their friends and relatives. A person who used the service told us how “it is all about staff knowing what to do for us and they all know that here.”

Is the service well-led?

Staff had a good understanding of the ethos of the home and quality assurance processes were in place. People told us they were asked for their feedback on the service they received though they could not recall completing a customer satisfaction survey. A family member told us how “I look forward to coming here; it is a very well-run home.” Staff told us they were clear about their roles and responsibilities. They also told us that management support was very good and there was a manager on call 24 hours a day.

23rd May 2013 - During a routine inspection pdf icon

We spoke with ten of the twenty people using the service at Athol House. Their comments about the service included “they look after us well”, “it’s a good place” and “some of the staff are as good as gold”.

A visitor told us that they were pleased with the service their relative received at Athol House.

A professional involved with the service told us their client was “very happy at Athol House” and said they had benefitted from the help they had received from speech therapy and physiotherapy arranged by the service.

Staff told us they enjoyed their work and felt the service had improved over the time they had worked there.

People participated in activities they enjoyed. These included gardening, visiting art galleries, going to the cinema and to concerts. People's religious and cultural needs were supported. We heard that one person was assisted to make contact with a religious leader. One person told us that the meals include items that reflected their cultural background.

We observed that there was relaxed and warm interaction between people at the service and with staff.

People were asked for their consent for care and treatment.

Care planning systems were in place but one person did not have an effective care plan.

The complaints system was effective and concerns were investigated fully, but one person had not received a copy of the procedure.

4th January 2013 - During a routine inspection pdf icon

We spoke with four people using the service and four members of staff. We looked at the care records of one person using the service, with their permission, and the training records of four members of staff.

The people we spoke with told us they felt they could approach staff if they that any concerns. They had opportunities to make suggestions about how the service was run. They were able to follow their own interests and to participate in group or individual activities in the home or in the local community.

Care planning records had detailed information about health care needs and medication, in addition to social care needs and individual goals. People had access to physiotherapy and other healthcare services to meet their needs.

We found staff were well trained in supporting people with their medicines and there were good systems in place to make sure that risks associated with medicines were minimised.

The people we spoke with said staff were responsive and provided good care and support. Staff had access to a variety of training courses and the members of staff we spoke with said they felt well supported.

There were good systems in place to check the quality of the service and the home listened to the views of people using the service.

1st February 2011 - During a routine inspection pdf icon

People who live at the home told us that they were happy there. They said that they were well cared for and that the staff were friendly and supportive. One person said, ‘this home is perfect’. Another person told us, ‘the staff are the best and everyone is kind and caring’.

People told us that the home was well maintained and that they were able to do the things they wanted. They told us that they had their needs met and that they were able to make choices about their lives.

 

 

Latest Additions: