Attention: The information on this website is currently out of date and should not be relied upon..

Care Services

carehome, nursing and medical services directory


Bearsted Medical Practice, Yeoman Lane, Bearsted, Maidstone.

Bearsted Medical Practice in Yeoman Lane, Bearsted, Maidstone is a Doctors/GP specialising in the provision of services relating to diagnostic and screening procedures, family planning services, maternity and midwifery services, services for everyone and treatment of disease, disorder or injury. The last inspection date here was 9th April 2019

Bearsted Medical Practice is managed by Bearsted Medical Practice.

Contact Details:

    Address:
      Bearsted Medical Practice
      The Surgery
      Yeoman Lane
      Bearsted
      Maidstone
      ME14 4DS
      United Kingdom
    Telephone:
      01622737326

Ratings:

For a guide to the ratings, click here.

Safe: Good
Effective: Good
Caring: Good
Responsive: Good
Well-Led: Good
Overall: Good

Further Details:

Important Dates:

    Last Inspection 2019-04-09
    Last Published 2019-04-09

Local Authority:

    Kent

Link to this page:

    HTML   BBCode

Inspection Reports:

Click the title bar on any of the report introductions below to read the full entry. If there is a PDF icon, click it to download the full report.

28th February 2019 - During a routine inspection pdf icon

We carried out an announced comprehensive inspection at Bearsted Medical Practice on 5 March 2019 as part of our inspection programme.

At this inspection we followed up on breaches of regulations identified at a previous inspection on 7 July 2018.

We based our judgement of the quality of care at this service on a combination of:

  • what we found when we inspected
  • information from our ongoing monitoring of data about services and
  • information from the provider, patients, the public and other organisations.

We have rated this practice as good overall and good for all population groups.

We found that:

  • The practice had improved the way in which it provided care, that kept patients safe and protected them from avoidable harm.
  • Improvements had been made to ensure there were comprehensive systems to keep people safe, which took account of current best practice. The whole team was engaged in reviewing and improving safety and safeguarding systems.
  • Patients received effective care and treatment that met their needs.
  • Staff dealt with patients with kindness and respect and involved them in decisions about their care.
  • The practice organised and delivered services to meet patients’ needs. Patients could access care and treatment in a timely way.
  • The way the practice was led and managed promoted the delivery of high-quality, person-centre care.
  • Systems and processes to ensure good governance had been improved to ensure they were implemented effectively.

Details of our findings and the evidence supporting our ratings are set out in the evidence tables.

Dr Rosie Bennyworth BS BMedSci MRCGP


Chief Inspector of General Practice

12th July 2018 - During a routine inspection pdf icon

This practice is rated as requires improvement overall. (Previous rating March 2015 – Good)

The key questions are rated as:

Are services safe? – Requires improvement

Are services effective? – Good

Are services caring? – Good

Are services responsive? – Good

Are services well-led? - Requires improvement

We carried out an announced comprehensive inspection at Bearsted Medical Practice on 12 July 2018, under Section 60 of the Health and Social Care Act 2008 as part of our regulatory functions. This inspection was planned to check whether the provider was meeting the legal requirements and regulations associated with the Health and Social Care Act 2008, to look at the overall quality of the service, and to provide a rating for the service under the Care Act 2014.

At this inspection we found:

  • The practice’s system for reporting and recording significant events was not always effectively managed and implemented.
  • The practice did not always have clear systems to manage risk so that safety incidents were less likely to happen. For example, infection prevention and control and fire safety procedures.
  • The practice routinely reviewed the effectiveness and appropriateness of the care it provided. It ensured that care and treatment was delivered according to evidence- based guidelines.
  • Staff involved and treated patients with compassion, kindness, dignity and respect.
  • Patients found the appointment system easy to use and reported that they were able to access care when they needed it.
  • Governance arrangements were not always sufficient or effectively implemented.
  • There was a strong focus on continuous learning and improvement at all levels of the organisation.

The areas where the provider must make improvements as they are in breach of regulations are:

  • Ensure that care and treatment is provided in a safe way for service users.
  • Ensure that systems and processes to ensure good governance are implemented effectively.

The areas where the provider should make improvements are:

  • Continue to monitor and embed the procedure for two week wait referrals.
  • Continue to monitor and improve the way in which national patient safety alerts are managed.
  • Continue to monitor and embed the procedure for checks of repeat prescription collection.

Professor Steve Field CBE FRCP FFPH FRCGP
Chief Inspector of General Practice

1st January 1970 - During a routine inspection pdf icon

Letter from the Chief Inspector of General Practice

We carried out an announced comprehensive inspection of Bearsted Medical Practice on 24 and 25 March 2015. The inspection was carried out over two days as there was insufficient time to establish enough information in one day which is why we returned on a second day. Overall the practice is rated as good.

Specifically, we found the practice to be good for providing safe, effective, caring, responsive and well-led services. It was also good for providing services for the patient population groups of; older people, people with long-term conditions, families, children and young people, working age people (including those recently retired and students), people whose circumstances may make them vulnerable and people experiencing poor mental health (including people with dementia).

Our key findings were as follows:

  • Staff understood and fulfilled their responsibilities to raise concerns, and to report incidents and near misses. Information about safety was recorded, monitored, appropriately reviewed and addressed.
  • Risks to patients were assessed and well managed.
  • Patient’s needs were assessed and care was planned and delivered following best practice guidance. Staff had received training appropriate to their roles and any further training needs had been identified and planned.
  • Patients said they were treated with compassion, dignity and respect and they were involved in their care and decisions about their treatment.
  • Information about services and how to complain was available and easy to understand.
  • Patients said they found it easy to make an appointment with a named GP and that there was continuity of care, with urgent appointments available the same day.
  • The practice had good facilities and was well equipped to treat patients and meet their needs.
  • There was a clear leadership structure and staff felt supported by management. The practice proactively sought feedback from staff and patients, which it acted on.

However, there were areas of practice where the provider needs to make improvements.

Importantly the provider should;

  • Ensure maintenance of the vaccines cold chain is adequately monitored and recorded.

Professor Steve Field (CBE FRCP FFPH FRCGP) 

Chief Inspector of General Practice

 

 

Latest Additions: