Attention: The information on this website is currently out of date and should not be relied upon..

Care Services

carehome, nursing and medical services directory


Bella Vou Ltd, 45-47 The Pantiles, Tunbridge Wells.

Bella Vou Ltd in 45-47 The Pantiles, Tunbridge Wells is a Clinic and Doctors/GP specialising in the provision of services relating to caring for adults over 65 yrs, caring for adults under 65 yrs, diagnostic and screening procedures, family planning services, surgical procedures and treatment of disease, disorder or injury. The last inspection date here was 16th October 2019

Bella Vou Ltd is managed by Bella Vou Ltd.

Contact Details:

    Address:
      Bella Vou Ltd
      Market House
      45-47 The Pantiles
      Tunbridge Wells
      TN2 5TE
      United Kingdom
    Telephone:
      01892257357
    Website:

Ratings:

For a guide to the ratings, click here.

Safe: No Rating / Under Appeal / Rating Suspended
Effective: No Rating / Under Appeal / Rating Suspended
Caring: No Rating / Under Appeal / Rating Suspended
Responsive: No Rating / Under Appeal / Rating Suspended
Well-Led: No Rating / Under Appeal / Rating Suspended
Overall: No Rating / Under Appeal / Rating Suspended

Further Details:

Important Dates:

    Last Inspection 2019-10-16
    Last Published 2017-06-15

Local Authority:

    Kent

Link to this page:

    HTML   BBCode

Inspection Reports:

Click the title bar on any of the report introductions below to read the full entry. If there is a PDF icon, click it to download the full report.

1st January 1970 - During a routine inspection pdf icon

Bella Vou Ltd is operated by Mr Amir Nakhdjevani. The clinic provides cosmetic surgery and outpatients services from 45-47 The Pantiles Tunbridge Wells. The clinic carries out a number of surgical procedures under local anaesthetic and has three operating theatres and outpatient and diagnostic facilities.

We inspected this service using our comprehensive inspection methodology. We carried out the announced part of the inspection on 22 March 2017.

To get to the heart of patients’ experiences of care and treatment, we ask the same five questions of all services: are they safe, effective, caring, responsive to people's needs, and well-led? Where we have a legal duty to do so we rate services’ performance against each key question as outstanding, good, requires improvement or inadequate.

Throughout the inspection, we took account of what people told us and how the provider understood and complied with the Mental Capacity Act 2005.

We found areas of excellent practice:

  • The service provided a high level of training for aesthetic plastic and reconstructive surgery via the post training fellows placement. It was most unusual for a service of this size to offer such a post and reflected the high regard that this service was held in by fellow plastic and reconstructive surgical specialists.

  • Staff worked especially hard to make the patient experience as pleasant and as individualised as possible. Staff recognised and responded to the holistic needs of their patients from the first referral before admission to checks on their wellbeing after they were discharged from the hospital.

  • The service managed staffing effectively and services always had enough staff with the appropriate skills, experience and training to keep patients safe and to meet their care needs.

Services we do not rate

We regulate cosmetic surgery services but we do not currently have a legal duty to rate them. We highlight good practice and issues that service providers need to improve and take regulatory action as necessary.

We found the following issues the service provider needs to improve:

Following this inspection, we told the provider that it should make improvements to comply with the regulations even though a regulation had not been breached, to help the service improve.

  • The provider should review its serious incident reporting policy to include references relating to the duty of candour.

  • The provider should risk assess the placement of resuscitation equipment to cover all patient areas.

  • The provider should produce documented evidence when stock expiry dates are checked.

  • The provider should finalise its operational policy and share with the staff.

  • The provider should ensure that a debrief takes place at the end of all surgical procedures.

Professor Sir Mike Richards

Chief Inspector of Hospitals

 

 

Latest Additions: