Attention: The information on this website is currently out of date and should not be relied upon..

Care Services

carehome, nursing and medical services directory


Bluebird Care (Barnet), Edgware.

Bluebird Care (Barnet) in Edgware is a Homecare agencies specialising in the provision of services relating to caring for adults over 65 yrs, caring for children (0 - 18yrs), dementia, learning disabilities, mental health conditions, personal care, physical disabilities and sensory impairments. The last inspection date here was 12th October 2017

Bluebird Care (Barnet) is managed by KLEJ Ltd.

Contact Details:

    Address:
      Bluebird Care (Barnet)
      149 Hale Lane
      Edgware
      HA8 9QW
      United Kingdom
    Telephone:
      02030110996

Ratings:

For a guide to the ratings, click here.

Safe: Good
Effective: Good
Caring: Good
Responsive: Good
Well-Led: Good
Overall: Good

Further Details:

Important Dates:

    Last Inspection 2017-10-12
    Last Published 2017-10-12

Local Authority:

    Barnet

Link to this page:

    HTML   BBCode

Inspection Reports:

Click the title bar on any of the report introductions below to read the full entry. If there is a PDF icon, click it to download the full report.

31st July 2017 - During a routine inspection pdf icon

Bluebird Care Barnet is a domiciliary care agency providing personal care and support for 143 people in the Barnet area. The service supports people in their own homes to maintain independence who have needs around a range of issues including their physical health, dementia, or learning disabilities.

At the last inspection on 28 April and 5 May 2015, the service was rated Good.

At this inspection we found the service remained Good.

Staff knew how to report safeguarding concerns and there were robust processes in place to ensure concerns were followed up. Risks were fully assessed and there were control measures identified for any areas of concern. Medicines were managed safely and staff had face to face training and competency testing on administering medicines.

Recruitment processes were thorough and showed staff had been checked they were competent and safe to work with vulnerable people before starting in their role.

People were supported to have maximum choice and control of their lives and staff supported them in the least restrictive way possible; the policies and systems in the service supported this practice.

Staff received effective support to fulfil their roles through regular supervision and training related to the needs of the people they were supporting. People said they were happy with how they were supported to eat and drink and had their food prepared. Fluid intake records and food records were maintained for people that needed them.

People said staff were kind and caring. We saw many examples of where the service had gone the extra mile in supporting people to feel valued and cared for. People and families had an input into care planning. People were offered choice in how they had their care and care staff treated people with respect and dignity.

Changes in needs were responded to promptly and care files were person centred and from the perspective of the individual they were describing care for. Care plans were detailed and gave detailed descriptions of what care staff needed to do. People’s preferences were captured.

Complaints were managed in line with the provider’s policy and people and relatives knew how to complain.

The service was well led and all staff we spoke with felt supported. People were placed at the centre of the service’s focus and the registered managers and directors were eager to listen to feedback and make any improvements that might impact on the quality of care. Audits were robust and regular spot checks were completed during care calls.

Further information is in the detailed findings below.

1st January 1970 - During a routine inspection pdf icon

This inspection took place on 28 April 2015 and 5 May 2015. It was unannounced.

Bluebird Care (Barnet) is a domiciliary care agency registered to provide personal care to people living in their own homes. The registered provider is KLEJ Limited. Referrals to the service come from various sources including the Clinical Commissioning Group (CCG), private and social services. At the time of our inspection approximately 120 people were receiving a personal care service, and the agency employed approximately 100 staff members including 20 live-in care workers. The service was registered at its current location on 11 February 2015.

The service did not have a registered manager however an application had been made to register a manager who was in post at the time of the inspection. A registered manager is a person who has registered with the Care Quality Commission to manage the service. Like registered providers, they are ‘registered persons’. Registered persons have legal responsibility for meeting the requirements in the Health and Social Care Act and associated Regulations about how the service is run.

We found that people were kept safe and free from harm with risk assessments in place to address relevant issues. There were enough staff employed to meet people’s needs and to provide a flexible service. Systems were in place to ensure that the Mental Capacity Act 2005 was followed with people’s consent recorded as appropriate. Staff training in this area was being rolled out to all of the team.

Staff received regular training and were knowledgeable about their roles and responsibilities, and they received regular supervision and support.

Staff knew the people they were supporting and provided a personalised service. Care plans were in place detailing how people wished to be supported. People spoke highly of the support staff provided.

People were supported to eat and drink, and to attend health care appointments. Systems were in place for staff to administer their prescribed medicines safely, although there was room for improvement in the implementation of the new medicine records audits.

People told us that the management were accessible and approachable, and that they felt able to speak up about any areas for improvement. There were regular checks in place to review the quality of the service provided to people.

At this inspection there were no breaches of regulations, but one recommendation has been made regarding the recording and monitoring of concerns and incidents.

 

 

Latest Additions: