Attention: The information on this website is currently out of date and should not be relied upon..

Care Services

carehome, nursing and medical services directory


Caremark (Brentwood & Basildon), 3 The Drive, Warley, Brentwood.

Caremark (Brentwood & Basildon) in 3 The Drive, Warley, Brentwood is a Homecare agencies specialising in the provision of services relating to caring for adults over 65 yrs, caring for adults under 65 yrs, dementia, personal care and physical disabilities. The last inspection date here was 19th March 2020

Caremark (Brentwood & Basildon) is managed by I & M Healthcare Limited.

Contact Details:

Ratings:

For a guide to the ratings, click here.

Safe: Good
Effective: Good
Caring: Good
Responsive: Good
Well-Led: Good
Overall: Good

Further Details:

Important Dates:

    Last Inspection 2020-03-19
    Last Published 2017-07-19

Local Authority:

    Essex

Link to this page:

    HTML   BBCode

Inspection Reports:

Click the title bar on any of the report introductions below to read the full entry. If there is a PDF icon, click it to download the full report.

8th June 2017 - During a routine inspection pdf icon

Caremark is a domiciliary care agency (DCA) which provides care and support to people in their own homes. At the time of our inspection there were 16 people using the service.

The inspection was announced and took place on 8 June 2017 with follow up visits on 9 June 2017. We gave the manager 48 hours' notice of the inspection because we needed to be sure that staff and people using the service would be available to speak with us. At the time of inspection there was a registered manager in post. A registered manager is a person who has registered with the Care Quality Commission to manage the service. Like registered providers, they are 'registered persons'. Registered persons have legal responsibility for meeting the requirements in the Health and Social Care Act and associated Regulations about how the service is run.

People were protected from harm by staff who understood their safeguarding responsibilities. Staff recognised the signs of abuse and knew what action to take if abuse was suspected. Staff were aware of the whistle-blowing policy and were confident that if they raised concerns these would be listened to and actioned appropriately.

People had risk assessments and management plans in place which provided guidance to staff on how care was to be provided in order to prevent or minimise the risk of people coming to harm.

People who required support with medicines were assisted by staff who were trained and assessed as competent to give medicines safely.

Robust recruitment processes were in place to ensure the safe recruitment of staff. There were sufficient numbers of staff deployed to safely meet people's needs.

Staff received a comprehensive induction and on going training to equip them with the knowledge and skills to care and support people effectively. Supervision and spot checks were regularly carried out to monitor and assess staff competency.

The legal requirements of the Mental Capacity Act 2005 (MCA) were followed when people were unable to make specific decisions about their care. The MCA provides a legal framework for making particular decisions on behalf of people who may lack the mental capacity to do so for themselves. The service supported people with decision-making and involved people’s family members or representatives in the decision-making process.

Where people were assisted at mealtimes, they were supported to have enough to eat and drink which reflected their preferences and met their health needs. The service worked with health and social care professionals when staff had concerns about people's health and wellbeing.

Staff were kind and caring, knew people well and treated them with dignity and respect. The service adopted a person-centred approach and care was tailored to meet people's individual needs.

Care plans detailed how people wished to be supported. People were involved in the care planning process and in decisions about their care and treatment.

There were systems in place to support people to make a complaint or raise concerns about the service. Feedback from people who used the service was actively sought and the information was used to improve the service people received.

Staff enjoyed working at the service . They were supported by the registered manager who they described as approachable and accessible.

There were systems in place to monitor the quality and safety of the service and action was taken to make any necessary improvements to develop the service.

 

 

Latest Additions: