Creative Support - East Lancashire Extra Care Services, Ribbleton, Preston.
Creative Support - East Lancashire Extra Care Services in Ribbleton, Preston is a Homecare agencies and Supported housing specialising in the provision of services relating to caring for adults over 65 yrs, personal care and physical disabilities. The last inspection date here was 7th November 2018
For a guide to the ratings, click here.
This provider also manages:
Blackburn Service - Blackburn
Creative Support - Apsley Court - Orpington
Creative Support - Avonlea - Wellingborough
Creative Support - Balshaw Respite Service - Chorley
Creative Support - Barrow & Kendal Personalised Services - Barrow-in-furness
Creative Support - Beardall Court - Wallsend
Creative Support - Bedford Services - Bedford
Creative Support - Bedfordshire Service - Houghton Regis
Creative Support - Blackpool Service (Learning Disabilities) - Blackpool
Creative Support - Bolton Service - Bolton
Creative Support - Bradford Service - Shipley
Creative Support - Bredon Respite Service - Runcorn
Creative Support - Brownley Road - Manchester
Creative Support - Burnley Personalised Services - Burnley
Creative Support - Burnside Court Extra Care Carlisle - Carlisle
Creative Support - Bury Service - Bury
Creative Support - Calderdale & Kirklees Services - Halifax
Creative Support - Camden and Barnet Service - London
Creative Support - Cannock Services - Cannock
Creative Support - Chorley Service - Chorley
Creative Support - Clover Court & Warden Road - Edgware
Creative Support - Coopers Court Extra Care Service - London
Creative Support - Derby Service - Derby
Creative Support - Doncaster Personalised Services - Doncaster
Creative Support - Doncaster Services - Doncaster
Creative Support - Donnybrook Court - London
Creative Support - Dove Lane - Bedford
Creative Support - Dudden Mews - Millom
Creative Support - Duncan Court - London
Creative Support - Durham Services - Stockton On Tees
Creative Support - Fairlea - Wellingborough
Creative Support - Gateshead Service - Gateshead
Creative Support - Hampton Crescent - Leeds
Creative Support - Heysham Gardens - Carlisle
Creative Support - Heysham Intensive Support Services - Morecambe
Creative Support - High Street - Bedford
Creative Support - Jarrow Service - Jarrow
Creative Support - Kendal - Kendal
Creative Support - Lanchester Court - Rugby
Creative Support - Leeds Service (Brandling Court) - Leeds
Creative Support - Leicester Service - Leicester
Creative Support - Leonora Street - Stoke On Trent
Creative Support - Little Paddock - Bedford
Creative Support - Manchester Enduring Mental Health Needs Service - Manchester
Creative Support - Manchester Extra Care Services - Manchester
Creative Support - Manchester Mental Health Services - Manchester
Creative Support - Manchester Services - Sale
Creative Support - Maytree Court - Liverpool
Creative Support - Monkwray Court - Whitehaven
Creative Support - Morecambe Service (Learning Disability) - Morecambe
Creative Support - North East Lincolnshire Services - Grimsby
Creative Support - North Lincolnshire Services - Scunthorpe
Creative Support - North Manchester Personalised Services - Manchester
Creative Support - Northampton Services - Northampton
Creative Support - Northampton Services - Northampton
Creative Support - Pelham House - Newbury
Creative Support - Pine Court - Derby
Creative Support - Reading Services - Reading
Creative Support - Regency Court - Bromley
Creative Support - Robert Heath Street - Stoke-on-Trent
Creative Support - Rowan Village - Stoke on Trent
Creative Support - Salford Complex Needs Learning Disability Service - Manchester
Creative Support - Salford Personalised Services - Manchester
Creative Support - Salford Physical Disabilities Service - Salford
Creative Support - Sandwell & Dudley Service - Wolverhampton
Creative Support - Simonside Court - South Shields
Creative Support - Slough Services - Slough
Creative Support - Slough Supported Living - Slough
Creative Support - Sonali Gardens & Prince of Wales Extra Care Services - London
Creative Support - South Lakes Service - Windermere
Creative Support - South Manchester Womens Project - Manchester
Creative Support - St Helens Respite Service - St Helens
Creative Support - St. Helens - St. Helens
Creative Support - Staffordshire Services - Stoke-on-Trent
Creative Support - Stockport Extra Care Services - Stockport
Creative Support - Stockport Supported Living Service - Stockport
Creative Support - Stockton Homecare & Middlesbrough Services - Stockton-on-Tees
Creative Support - Sue Starkey House & Shipton House - London
Creative Support - Sutherland Court - London
Creative Support - Tameside Domiciliary Service - Manchester
Creative Support - Tameside Intense Support Service - Stalybridge
Creative Support - Tameside Personalised Services - Ashton-under-lyne
Creative Support - Telford & Shropshire - Telford
Creative Support - Telford & Shropshire Services - Telford
Creative Support - The Chestnuts - Wellingborough
Creative Support - The Frogponds - Wellingborough
Creative Support - The Glade - Bedford
Creative Support - The Houghtons - Bedford
Creative Support - The Laurels (Cumbria) - Carlisle
Creative Support - Trafford Respite Service - Trafford
Creative Support - Trafford Supported Living Service - Sale
Creative Support - Ulverston Autism Service - Ulverston
Creative Support - Warrington Personalised Services - Warrington
Creative Support - Warwickshire Services - Bidford-on-Avon
Creative Support - Warwickshire Supported Living Service - Warwick
Creative Support - Wellingborough Services - Northampton
Creative Support - West Berkshire Services - Newbury
Creative Support - Whinn Dale Extra Care Service - Normanton
Creative Support - Whitby, Stockton and Redcar and Cleveland - Whitby
Creative Support - Wigan Service - Wigan
Creative Support - Willowtree House - Wellingborough
Creative Support - Wolverhampton Service - Wolverhampton
Creative Support – Oaktree House and Cedar Court - Reading
Creative Support East Lancashire Personalised Services - Accrington
Creative Support Leeds Service - Leeds
Creative Support Limited - Hartlepool Service - Stockton-on-Tees
Creative Support Thistley Green Intensive Support Service - Braintree
Creative Support-Cornerstones and Chimney Court - Reading
Danesfield - Jarrow
Doseley Road - Telford
Sheffield Services - Sheffield
Link to this page:
Click the title bar on any of the report introductions below to read the full entry. If there is a PDF icon, click it to download the full report.
26th September 2018 - During a routine inspection
We inspected this service on 26 September 2018.
Creative Support Ainscough Brook is an Extra Care scheme.
This service provides care and support to people living in specialist ‘extra care’ housing. Extra care housing is purpose-built or adapted single household accommodation in a shared site or building. The accommodation is [bought] [or] [rented], and is the occupant’s own home. People’s care and housing are provided under separate contractual agreements. CQC does not regulate premises used for extra care housing; this inspection looked at people’s personal care and support service.
People lived in their own apartments which were accessible via a communal main entrance. There were some communal areas to each floor and a large lounge to the ground floor of the building.
At the time of our inspection there were nine people receiving support in their own apartments from Creative Support.
At the last inspection in September 2015, the service was rated Good.
At this inspection we found the service remained Good.
Risk assessments were detailed and specific, and contained a good descriptive account for staff to follow, to enable them to minimise the risk of harm occurring to people who lived at the scheme. We saw there were detailed protocols in place around people for when their behaviour escalated and placed them in harm’s way.
There was enough staff employed by the service to help people with their day to day support needs.
There were systems and processes in place to ensure that people who lived at the scheme were safeguarded from abuse. This included training for staff which highlighted the different types of abuse and how to raise concerns within the infrastructure of the organisation. Staff we spoke with confirmed they knew how to raise concerns.
There was a process for analysing incidents, accidents and general near misses to determine what could be improved within the service provision. Some information was not always recorded, which we raised at the time with the registered manager.
There was personal protective equipment (PPE) available within the scheme, such as gloves, aprons and hand sanitiser.
Medication was well managed and only administered by staff who had the correct training to enable them to do this. Medication was stored securely within people’s own apartments.
The service was operating in accordance with the principles of the Mental Capacity Act (MCA) and consent was sought in line with people’s best interests. People’s mental health needs were assessed appropriately, and people were treated with equality and diversity which was evidenced in the outcomes of their support. Consent was also sought and clearly documented in line with legislation and guidance.
Staff had the correct training to enable them to support people safely. Staff said they were up-to-date with the training they were required by the organisation to undertake for the job and training records confirmed this. Staff engaged in regular supervision with their line managers, and had annual appraisals.
People were supported to make their own meals.
There was access to other medical professionals who often visited the scheme and were involved with people, and regular meetings with external healthcare professionals took place when needed.
People were treated as individuals, and their choices and preferences were respected by staff. Staff also described how the ensured they protected people’s dignity when providing personal care. Staff spoke with people and about them with warmth and sensitivity.
There was a complaints process in place which we were able to view as part of our inspection. There were no on-going complaints and there had been no complaints since our last inspection.
Staff undertook training to enable them to respectfully care for someone who was at the end of their life.
People’s support plans were person centred and contained a high level of detail about the person, their likes, dislikes, how they want
1st January 1970 - During a routine inspection
Creative Support – Ainscough Brook is a domiciliary care service located in Preston. The service operates from the sheltered housing scheme Ainscough Brook and provides personal care for up to 12 of the people who live at the scheme. At the time of the inspection there were seven people who used the service.
The inspection took place on 15 September 2015. We gave the provider 24 hours notice of our intention to inspect the service to ensure there would be someone available at the service’s office to provide us with the necessary information.
This was the first inspection of the service since it was registered with the Care Quality Commission in March 2014.
A registered manager is a person who has registered with the Care Quality Commission to manage the service. Like registered providers, they are ‘registered persons’. Registered persons have legal responsibility for meeting the requirements in the Health and Social Care Act 2008 and associated Regulations about how the service is run. The registered manager was not available during this inspection as they were taking a period of extended leave. However, we were assisted throughout the inspection by an acting manager, team leader and a regional manager.
We spoke with people who used the service, some relatives, staff and community professionals during the inspection. The feedback we received from people was very positive. People expressed satisfaction with all aspects of the service provided and spoke highly of staff and managers. People who used the service told us they were treated with compassion and kindness and that their privacy and dignity were respected.
There were effective systems in place to assess and manage risks to people’s health, safety and wellbeing. Staff were fully aware of personal risks people’s faced for instance, in relation to their health or mobility, and the measures they should take to support people safely. Environmental risk assessments were carried out to ensure people’s accommodation was safe and secure. However, these assessments did not cover people’s life line pendants, used in the case of an emergency. This was discussed with the acting manager who agreed to implement a system which included regular checking of the pendants.
Staff were fully aware of their responsibilities to safeguard people they supported from abuse. Staff were able to speak confidently about their role in safeguarding people and told us they were confident managers would support them if they raised any concerns.
The service worked well with community health care professionals to help ensure people received effective health care. People who required assistance to take their medicines were provided with safe support.
People’s care plans reflected their individual needs and personal wishes. People told us they were involved in the development of their care plans and were enabled to express their views on an ongoing basis.
Staffing levels were carefully assessed and regularly reviewed. This helped to ensure people received a consistent and reliable service.
Staff at the service were carefully recruited and were required to undergo a number of background checks prior to starting their employment. This helped to ensure only people with the correct skills and of suitable character were employed.
There was a comprehensive training programme in place for staff. This helped ensure that staff had the necessary skills and knowledge to carry out their roles in a safe and effective manner.
There were systems in place which enabled the acting manager and provider to monitor the quality and safety of the service on an ongoing basis so that any areas for improvement could be promptly identified and actioned.
The service had undergone some changes to the management team. People had been kept informed of the changes and were satisfied with the interim arrangements. People described the management team as supportive and approachable and were satisfied with the leadership of the service.