Attention: The information on this website is currently out of date and should not be relied upon..

Care Services

carehome, nursing and medical services directory


Cygnet Hospital Coventry, Coventry.

Cygnet Hospital Coventry in Coventry is a Hospitals - Mental health/capacity and Rehabilitation (illness/injury) specialising in the provision of services relating to assessment or medical treatment for persons detained under the 1983 act, caring for adults over 65 yrs, caring for adults under 65 yrs, caring for people whose rights are restricted under the mental health act, eating disorders, mental health conditions and treatment of disease, disorder or injury. The last inspection date here was 26th May 2020

Cygnet Hospital Coventry is managed by Cygnet Health Care Limited who are also responsible for 18 other locations

Contact Details:

Ratings:

For a guide to the ratings, click here.

Safe: Good
Effective: Good
Caring: Good
Responsive: Good
Well-Led: Good
Overall: Good

Further Details:

Important Dates:

    Last Inspection 2020-05-26
    Last Published 2018-07-23

Local Authority:

    Coventry

Link to this page:

    HTML   BBCode

Inspection Reports:

Click the title bar on any of the report introductions below to read the full entry. If there is a PDF icon, click it to download the full report.

1st January 1970 - During a routine inspection pdf icon

We rated Cygnet Hospital Coventry as good because:

  • Staff completed comprehensive risk assessments for patients and updated these regularly. Staff attended a daily risk meeting for updates and this was also discussed in the ward handovers so all staff knew if risk had changed for individual patients. Staff had received training in safeguarding and knew how to report this. The hospital had good medicines management and clinic rooms were well equipped and fit for purpose.
  • The hospital provided patients with access to a wide range of healthcare professionals including doctors, nurses, healthcare assistants, psychologists, occupational therapists, and social workers. Patients were also supported to see a local GP and access the optician and dentist in the community and the hospital had a practice nurse who managed patients’ physical healthcare. Patients had access to a range of therapies including dialectical behaviour therapy.
  • Staff knew their patients well and engaged with them in a way which was caring, discreet and respectful. They put patient care first and listened to patients concerns. Patients had access to advocacy support on a weekly basis and could raise concerns in the ward community meetings or through the people’s council.
  • The hospital provided patients with an extensive activity programme which was continually being developed and improved. They had an excellent suite of activity rooms off the wards as well as areas such as kitchens for patients use on the wards. Patients baked cakes to be sold in the hospital shop which was run by patients.
  • The governance of the hospital had improved significantly with managers putting in a range of support to improve staff morale and the retention of staff. This included a much-improved induction process and role related training. Staff received a range of supervision and an annual appraisal to support them in their roles and to identify career progression. The introduction of a practice development lead had further strengthened support for staff.

However:

  • Managers did not always follow the organisation’s policy for observations and in one case a member of staff had completed continuous observations for longer than the two-hour period specified in the policy.
  • Families and carers felt the system for booking visits and the amount of space for visitors needed to be improved.
  • The hospital had a high staff turnover and staff on Dunsmore PICU raised concerns about staffing levels and whether these were adequate to meet the needs of patients.

 

 

Latest Additions: