Dean House Surgery, 193 High Street, Ponders End, Enfield.

Dean House Surgery in 193 High Street, Ponders End, Enfield is a Doctors/GP specialising in the provision of services relating to diagnostic and screening procedures, family planning services, services for everyone and treatment of disease, disorder or injury. The last inspection date here was 16th June 2017

Dean House Surgery is managed by Dr Sajida Choudhry.

Contact Details:

Address: Dean House Surgery The Surgery 193 High Street Ponders End Enfield EN3 4DZ United Kingdom Telephone: 02088041060

Ratings:

For a guide to the ratings, click here.

Further Details:

Important Dates:

Last Inspection		2017-06-16
Last Published		2017-06-16

Local Authority:

Enfield

Link to this page:

HTML   BBCode

Inspection Reports:

Click the title bar on any of the report introductions below to read the full entry. If there is a PDF icon, click it to download the full report.

28th April 2017 - During an inspection to make sure that the improvements required had been made

Letter from the Chief Inspector of General Practice

We carried out an announced comprehensive inspection at Dr Sajida Choudhry (Dean House Surgery) on 9 March 2016. The overall rating for the practice was Good. The full comprehensive report on the March 2016 inspection can be found by selecting the ‘all reports’ link for Dean House Surgery (Dr Sajida Choudhry) on our website at www.cqc.org.uk.

At our previous inspection on 9 March 2016, we rated the practice as requires improvement for providing safe services as the practice had not conducted a risk assessment for not having a defibrillator at the practice. In addition, the practice had no system for monitoring the usage of prescription pads.

This inspection was an announced focused inspection carried out on 28 April 2017 to confirm that the practice had carried out their plan to meet the legal requirements in relation to the breaches in regulations that we identified in our previous inspection on 9 March 2016. This report covers our findings in relation to those requirements and also additional improvements made since our last inspection. At this inspection, we found that the practice had purchased a defibrillator and that a system of monitoring usage of prescription pads had been introduced. As a result of these findings, the practice is now rated as good for providing safe services.

Overall the practice is still rated as Good.

Our key findings were as follows:

• The practice had the required equipment in the event of a medical emergency.
• The practice had introduced a system of keeping a log of the serial numbers of prescription to monitor the usage of prescription pads held at the practice.

Professor Steve Field (CBE FRCP FFPH FRCGP) 

Chief Inspector of General Practice

9th March 2016 - During a routine inspection

Letter from the Chief Inspector of General Practice

We carried out an announced comprehensive inspection at Dr Sajida Choudhry (Dean House Surgery) on 9 March 2016. The overall rating for the practice was Good. The full comprehensive report on the March 2016 inspection can be found by selecting the ‘all reports’ link for Dean House Surgery (Dr Sajida Choudhry) on our website at www.cqc.org.uk.

At our previous inspection on 9 March 2016, we rated the practice as requires improvement for providing safe services as the practice had not conducted a risk assessment for not having a defibrillator at the practice. In addition, the practice had no system for monitoring the usage of prescription pads.

This inspection was an announced focused inspection carried out on 28 April 2017 to confirm that the practice had carried out their plan to meet the legal requirements in relation to the breaches in regulations that we identified in our previous inspection on 9 March 2016. This report covers our findings in relation to those requirements and also additional improvements made since our last inspection. At this inspection, we found that the practice had purchased a defibrillator and that a system of monitoring usage of prescription pads had been introduced. As a result of these findings, the practice is now rated as good for providing safe services.

Overall the practice is still rated as Good.

Our key findings were as follows:

• The practice had the required equipment in the event of a medical emergency.
• The practice had introduced a system of keeping a log of the serial numbers of prescription to monitor the usage of prescription pads held at the practice.

Professor Steve Field (CBE FRCP FFPH FRCGP) 

Chief Inspector of General Practice