Attention: The information on this website is currently out of date and should not be relied upon..

Care Services

carehome, nursing and medical services directory


Dr D S Rangar and Partners, Murton, Seaham.

Dr D S Rangar and Partners in Murton, Seaham is a Doctors/GP specialising in the provision of services relating to diagnostic and screening procedures, services for everyone and treatment of disease, disorder or injury. The last inspection date here was 26th January 2017

Dr D S Rangar and Partners is managed by Dr D S Rangar and Partners.

Contact Details:

    Address:
      Dr D S Rangar and Partners
      20 Woods Terrace East
      Murton
      Seaham
      SR7 9AB
      United Kingdom
    Telephone:
      01915170170

Ratings:

For a guide to the ratings, click here.

Safe: Good
Effective: Good
Caring: Good
Responsive: Good
Well-Led: Good
Overall: Good

Further Details:

Important Dates:

    Last Inspection 2017-01-26
    Last Published 2017-01-26

Local Authority:

    County Durham

Link to this page:

    HTML   BBCode

Inspection Reports:

Click the title bar on any of the report introductions below to read the full entry. If there is a PDF icon, click it to download the full report.

17th November 2016 - During a routine inspection pdf icon

Letter from the Chief Inspector of General Practice

We carried out an announced comprehensive inspection of Dr D S Rangar and Partners, Murton Medical Group on 17 November 2016. Overall the practice is rated as good.

Our key findings across all the areas we inspected were as follows:

  • Staff understood and fulfilled their responsibilities to raise concerns, and to report incidents and near misses. All opportunities for learning from internal and external incidents were maximised.
  • Risks to patients were assessed and well managed.
  • The practice carried out clinical audit activity and were able to demonstrate improvements to patient care as a result of this.
  • Feedback from patients about their care was better than local and national averages. Patients reported that they were treated with compassion, dignity and respect.
  • Patient feedback in relation to access was lower than local clinical commissioning group and national averages.
  • Patients were able to access same day appointments. Pre-bookable appointments were available within acceptable timescales.
  • The practice had a number of policies and procedures to govern activity, which were reviewed and updated regularly.
  • The practice was proactive in their approach to encouraging patients to use online services. Over 20% of the patient population had registered for online services.
  • The practice had proactively sought feedback from patients and implemented suggestions for improvement and made changes to the way they delivered services in response to feedback.
  • The practice used the Quality and Outcomes Framework (QOF) as one method of monitoring effectiveness and had achieved an overall result which was lower than local and national averages. However, their clinical exception rate was also lower than local and national averages.
  • Information about services and how to complain was available and easy to understand.
  • The practice had a clear vision in which quality and safety was prioritised. The strategy to deliver this vision was regularly discussed and reviewed.

Professor Steve Field (CBE FRCP FFPH FRCGP) 

Chief Inspector of General Practice

14th October 2013 - During a routine inspection pdf icon

We spoke with six patients who attended the surgery on the day of our inspection.

The patients we spoke with were, without exception, satisfied that staff explained about the choices available to them. One patient said “They always tell me about my treatment and my options.” Another patient said “The doctor is really good; she goes through everything with me.” This meant that patients were helped to understand the care and treatment choices available to them.

We saw the practice had safeguarding policies in place for both children and vulnerable adults. There was an identified lead clinician with a clear role to oversee safeguarding within the practice.

We saw the practice was clean, tidy and well maintained. Personal protective equipment and hand hygiene gel was available throughout the practice. Hand washing instructions were also displayed by hand basins and there was a supply of liquid soap and paper hand towels.

We found staff received regular training and supervision. Staff told us they felt supported by their managers.

All of the patients we spoke with said that they knew they could speak to a member of staff if they had a complaint. One patient said "I haven’t had to complain but would speak to the reception if I needed to.”

 

 

Latest Additions: