Attention: The information on this website is currently out of date and should not be relied upon..

Care Services

carehome, nursing and medical services directory


Dr Wafik Moustafa, Acton, London.

Dr Wafik Moustafa in Acton, London is a Doctors/GP specialising in the provision of services relating to diagnostic and screening procedures, maternity and midwifery services, services for everyone, surgical procedures and treatment of disease, disorder or injury. The last inspection date here was 11th April 2017

Dr Wafik Moustafa is managed by Dr Wafik Moustafa.

Contact Details:

    Address:
      Dr Wafik Moustafa
      122 Gunnersbury Lane
      Acton
      London
      W3 9BA
      United Kingdom
    Telephone:
      02089931314

Ratings:

For a guide to the ratings, click here.

Safe: Good
Effective: Good
Caring: Good
Responsive: Good
Well-Led: Good
Overall: Good

Further Details:

Important Dates:

    Last Inspection 2017-04-11
    Last Published 2017-04-11

Local Authority:

    Ealing

Link to this page:

    HTML   BBCode

Inspection Reports:

Click the title bar on any of the report introductions below to read the full entry. If there is a PDF icon, click it to download the full report.

5th December 2016 - During a routine inspection pdf icon

Letter from the Chief Inspector of General Practice

We carried out an announced comprehensive inspection at Acton Town Medical Centre on 5 December 2016. Overall the practice is rated as good.

Our key findings across all the areas we inspected were as follows:

  • There was an open and transparent approach to safety and a system in place for reporting and recording significant events. The provider was aware of the requirements of the duty of candour. Examples we reviewed showed the practice complied with these requirements.
  • The practice had clearly defined and embedded systems to minimise risks to patient safety.
  • Staff were aware of current evidence based guidance. Staff were appropriately trained and qualified and had the skills and knowledge to deliver effective care and treatment.
  • Results from the national GP patient survey were mixed. The practice consistently scored below average for the quality of consultations with clinical staff and for patient involvement in decision making. The receptionists were rated very highly for being helpful.
  • Information about services and how to complain was available. Improvements were made to the quality of care as a result of complaints and concerns.
  • Patients we spoke with said they found it easy to make an appointment with a named GP and there was continuity of care, with urgent appointments available the same day and routine appointments available within 48 hours.
  • The practice had good facilities and was well equipped to treat patients and meet their needs.
  • There was a clear leadership structure and staff felt supported by management. The practice sought feedback from staff and patients, which it acted on.

The areas where the provider should make improvement are:

  • The practice should improve the management and control of diabetes among the practice population.
  • The practice should record the monitoring checks it routinely carries out in relation to the emergency oxygen and defibrillator.
  • The practice should ensure that the locum pack contains the key information that locum staff who are unfamiliar with the practice may need.
  • The practice generally scored well on the national patient survey. However, it tended to score below average on questions about patient involvement in decision making. The practice should investigate this aspect of its service further with a view to improving the patient experience.

Professor Steve Field CBE FRCP FFPH FRCGP 

Chief Inspector of General Practice

 

 

Latest Additions: