Attention: The information on this website is currently out of date and should not be relied upon..

Care Services

carehome, nursing and medical services directory


ESH Community, Welsh Road East, Southam.

ESH Community in Welsh Road East, Southam is a Rehabilitation (substance abuse) specialising in the provision of services relating to accommodation for persons who require treatment for substance misuse, caring for adults over 65 yrs, caring for adults under 65 yrs and substance misuse problems. The last inspection date here was 19th March 2019

ESH Community is managed by ESH Works Ltd.

Contact Details:

    Address:
      ESH Community
      Holt Cottage Farm
      Welsh Road East
      Southam
      CV47 1NJ
      United Kingdom
    Telephone:
      01926811702
    Website:

Ratings:

For a guide to the ratings, click here.

Safe: Good
Effective: Good
Caring: Good
Responsive: Good
Well-Led: Good
Overall: Good

Further Details:

Important Dates:

    Last Inspection 2019-03-19
    Last Published 2019-03-19

Local Authority:

    Warwickshire

Link to this page:

    HTML   BBCode

Inspection Reports:

Click the title bar on any of the report introductions below to read the full entry. If there is a PDF icon, click it to download the full report.

24th January 2019 - During a routine inspection pdf icon

Werated ESH Community as good because:

  • There were good systems in place to keep clients safe during detoxification and recovery. Staff were skilled at observing, monitoring, recording and being alert to the health and well-being of clients.
  • The environment was safe and therapeutic. The service used new technology to support safe unobtrusive monitoring of clients undertaking detoxification.
  • The service was effective in ensuring recovery, both during and after a client’s admission. A major part of this was involving clients in frequent activities and therapies, both inside the service and out in the wider community. It helped to build clients’ resilience by involving families and carers and supporting them to develop new networks.
  • All staff worked together well, were open and transparent and communicated effectively.
  • The service was well-led by an experienced and ‘hands on’ management team, always available to advise and support.

However,

  • There was no routine audit process in place to ensure information from assessments were reflected clearly within the care plan and risk assessment. However, there was no impact on patient care and no evidence of harm.

 

 

Latest Additions: