Attention: The information on this website is currently out of date and should not be relied upon..

Care Services

carehome, nursing and medical services directory


Evergreen House, Kempston, Bedford.

Evergreen House in Kempston, Bedford is a Residential home specialising in the provision of services relating to accommodation for persons who require nursing or personal care, caring for adults under 65 yrs, learning disabilities, mental health conditions and sensory impairments. The last inspection date here was 7th September 2018

Evergreen House is managed by Mentaur Limited who are also responsible for 11 other locations

Contact Details:

    Address:
      Evergreen House
      59 Chantry Road
      Kempston
      Bedford
      MK42 7QU
      United Kingdom
    Telephone:
      01234867535
    Website:

Ratings:

For a guide to the ratings, click here.

Safe: Good
Effective: Good
Caring: Good
Responsive: Good
Well-Led: Good
Overall: Good

Further Details:

Important Dates:

    Last Inspection 2018-09-07
    Last Published 2018-09-07

Local Authority:

    Bedford

Link to this page:

    HTML   BBCode

Inspection Reports:

Click the title bar on any of the report introductions below to read the full entry. If there is a PDF icon, click it to download the full report.

14th August 2018 - During a routine inspection pdf icon

This inspection was carried out on 14 August 2018 and was unannounced. At their last inspection on 5 November 2015, they were found to be meeting the standards we inspected. At this inspection we found that they had continued to meet all the standards.

Evergreen House is a ‘care home’. People in care homes receive accommodation and nursing or personal care as single package under one contractual agreement. CQC regulates both the premises and the care provided, and both were looked at during this inspection. Evergreen House provides accommodation for up to six people with learning disabilities. The home is not registered to provide nursing care. At the time of the inspection there were six people living there.

The care service has been developed and designed in line with the values that underpin the Registering the Right Support and other best practice guidance. These values include choice, promotion of independence and inclusion. People with learning disabilities and autism using the service can live as ordinary a life as any citizen.

The service had a manager who was in the process of becoming registered with the Care Quality Commission (CQC). A registered manager is a person who has registered with the CQC to manage the service. Like registered providers, they are ‘registered persons’. Registered persons have legal responsibility for meeting the requirements in the Health and Social Care Act and associated Regulations about how the service is run.

People knew the management team and relatives told us the service was well run. There was a quality assurance process to help maintain and improve the service provided. People were regularly out in the community and the management team engaged with external agencies to help drive improvement.

People felt safe and staff knew how to respond to abuse. Risks were assessed and mitigated. However, staff training in regard to fire safety needed to be developed. This was carried out following the inspection. Medicines were managed safely and infection control was promoted.

People were supported by enough staff but recruitment processes needed to be more robust. Staff had opportunities for training and received supervision.

People managed their own nutrition with support from staff and the service worked in accordance with the principles of the Mental Capacity Act. People had access to health and social care professionals when needed.

People were treated with dignity, respect and kindness. The staff treated the service as it was people’s home. People were involved in planning and deciding their care and staff knew them well.

People received care that met their needs and support plans enabled the staff to support people appropriately. People enjoyed a range of activities that suited their hobbies, preferences and interests while promoting independence. There was a complaint’s process that people and relatives knew how to use.

5th November 2015 - During a routine inspection pdf icon

This inspection took place on 5 November 2015 and was unannounced.

Evergreen House provides care and support for up to six people with a learning disability. There were six people living at the service when we visited.

The service has a registered manager. A registered manager is a person who has registered with the Care Quality Commission to manage the service. Like registered providers, they are ‘registered persons’. Registered persons have legal responsibility for meeting the requirements in the Health and Social Care Act 2008 and associated Regulations about how the service is run.

Staff had been trained to recognise signs of potential abuse and to keep people safe. People felt safe living at the service.

Processes were in place to manage identifiable risks within the service and to ensure people did not have their freedom restricted unnecessarily.

The provider carried out recruitment checks on new staff to make sure they were suitable to work at the service.

There were systems in place to ensure people were supported to take their medicines safely and at the appropriate times.

Staff had been provided with essential training to keep their skills up to date and were supported with regular supervision from the registered manager.

People’s consent to care and support was sought in line with the Mental Capacity Act (MCA) 2005.

People were supported to eat and drink and to maintain a balanced diet.

People were registered with a GP. If required they were supported by staff to access other healthcare facilities.

Positive and caring relationships had been developed between people and staff.

The service had processes in place to ensure that people’s views were acted on.

People were encouraged to maintain their independence and staff promoted their privacy and dignity.

Pre-admission assessments were undertaken before people came to live at the service. This ensured their identified needs would be adequately met.

There was a complaints procedure in place to enable people to raise concerns if they needed to.

There was a positive, open and inclusive culture at the service.

There was good leadership and management demonstrated at the service, which inspired staff to provide a quality service.

There were quality assurance systems in place to monitor the quality of the service provided and to drive continuous improvements.

15th April 2014 - During a routine inspection pdf icon

We gathered evidence against the outcomes we inspected to help answer our five key questions; Is the service caring? Is the service responsive? Is the service safe? Is the service effective? Is the service well led? Below is a summary of what we found.

Is the service safe?

People told us they felt safe. They were cared for in an environment that was safe, clean and hygienic. People's needs had been assessed, and risk assessments described how any identified risks to people were minimised. The recruitment practice was safe and thorough and the provider took action to ensure staff competence.

Is the service effective?

People’s health and care needs were assessed and care plans were in place. They were happy with the care provided and their needs had been met. Staff had received training to support people with various care needs. Some of the people had complex needs that meant they were not able to understand their care plans and we saw that the Person Centred Planning (PCP) had been written in a 'easy read' format to enable people to understand their planned care and support. The service supported people to have adequate and nutritious food and drink, to ensure that they maintained good health.

Is the service caring?

People were supported by kind and attentive staff. It was clear from our observations and from speaking with the staff, that they had a good understanding of the needs of the people they supported. People told us the staff were caring. One person said, "I love all the staff and they mean the world to me."

Is the service responsive to people's needs?

We observed that staff responded promptly to people's needs. We saw that care plans had been updated when people's needs had changed, and that referrals had been made to other health and social care professionals when required. The service took account of individual preferences, and people were supported to access a variety of activities of their choice.

Is the service well-led?

The service had a registered manager in post. We saw that the provider had effective systems to assess and monitor the quality of the service they provided. They regularly sought the views of people using the service and their representatives, and took account of these to improve the service.

16th April 2013 - During a routine inspection pdf icon

During our visit to Evergreen House on 16 April 2013, we observed people being supported and encouraged to maintain their independence in line with their abilities. At the time of our inspection, there were three people living in the home, and of those three, one person was out at college.

The service provided a friendly, homely environment which was spacious and decorated to support people with a sensory impairment. We observed people being relaxed and enjoying the company of staff.

Due to the learning disabilities and communication difficulties of the two people we spoke with, they were not able to fully tell us about their experiences. However, one person was able to communicate with us that they felt cared for and said “… it’s good.” We also observed them expressing their feelings through facial expressions, body language, and communication methods appropriate for them. Both people looked well cared for.

We reviewed the safeguarding processes in place and also the support systems for staff. We saw evidence that staff were supported and had been appropriately trained to carry out their roles in providing care for people.

We also looked at the complaints records and saw that no complaint had been received since the service had opened in August 2012.

 

 

Latest Additions: