Attention: The information on this website is currently out of date and should not be relied upon..

Care Services

carehome, nursing and medical services directory


Family Care Solutions, The Courtyard, Earl Road, Cheadle Hulme, Cheadle.

Family Care Solutions in The Courtyard, Earl Road, Cheadle Hulme, Cheadle is a Homecare agencies specialising in the provision of services relating to caring for adults over 65 yrs, caring for adults under 65 yrs, caring for children (0 - 18yrs), dementia, learning disabilities, mental health conditions, personal care, physical disabilities and sensory impairments. The last inspection date here was 12th September 2018

Family Care Solutions is managed by Mrs Lynda Margery Dunlop.

Contact Details:

Ratings:

For a guide to the ratings, click here.

Safe: Good
Effective: Good
Caring: Good
Responsive: Good
Well-Led: Requires Improvement
Overall: Good

Further Details:

Important Dates:

    Last Inspection 2018-09-12
    Last Published 2018-09-12

Local Authority:

    Cheshire East

Link to this page:

    HTML   BBCode

Inspection Reports:

Click the title bar on any of the report introductions below to read the full entry. If there is a PDF icon, click it to download the full report.

9th July 2018 - During a routine inspection pdf icon

Family Care Solutions is a domiciliary care service providing support for people living in their own homes who may need support with daily living tasks such as personal care. The service provides support primarily to older adults but also provides support to people with other needs. At the time of the inspection Family Care Solutions was delivering care packages to two children.

The provider of Family Care Solutions is a registered individual and this person was part of the management team. Registered persons have legal responsibility for meeting the requirements in the Health and Social Care Act 2008 and associated Regulations about how the service is run.

Not everyone using Family Care Solutions receives a regulated activity; CQC only inspects the service being received by people provided with ‘personal care’; help with tasks related to personal hygiene and eating. Where they do we also take into account any wider social care provided. At the time of our inspection the service was supporting 55 people with a regulated activity.

The inspection took place on the 9, 10 and 16 July 2018 and was announced to ensure that somebody would be available in the office to help us during the inspection.

The service was previously inspected in June 2016 and at that time was rated good overall. The service was rated as being good in the four domains of effective, caring, responsive and well-led and rated as Requires Improvement in the Safe domain. This was because we found the provider to be in breach of Regulation 12 safe care and treatment, as the provider was not taking reasonably practicable steps to reduce risks in relation to moving and handling. The provider was also found to be in breach of Regulation 19 as safe systems of recruitment were not being effectively operated.

Following the last inspection, we asked the provider to complete an action plan to show how they would ensure they met the regulations. The action plan detailed the arrangements made to ensure the service was compliant with Regulation 12 through providing moving and handling training on an ongoing basis for all staff. The action plan also detailed how the provider would meet Regulation 19 through the introduction of candidate evaluation forms and pre-employment checks. At this inspection we found the service was no longer in breach of these Regulations.

Care records contained clear detailed information and risk assessments in relation to moving and handling and there were policies in place to underpin the training required for staff. This included annual manual handling refresher training.

Systems to support the safe recruitment of staff were in place. We saw references and Disclosure and Barring Service (DBS) checks were being completed before a member of staff began working for the service. The DBS identifies people who are barred from working with children and vulnerable adults and informs the service provider of any criminal convictions noted against the applicant. These checks should help to ensure people are protected from the risk of being supported by unsuitable staff.

The service was continually recruiting and was aware that this would enable greater consistency for people. This would ensure that people were supported by staff who knew them and their care needs well.

There were policies and procedures in place to safeguard people from harm. Staff were trained to identify different types of abuse and respond to safeguarding concerns.

Assessments of people were undertaken and used to develop peoples’ care plans and risk assessments. Individual risk assessments were in place and documented actions for staff to reduce identified risk and promote peoples’ safety. Generic safety risk assessments in relation to the other aspects, such as laundry and clinical waste, were also in place. Care plans and risk assessments were reviewed regularly, and amended when there were changes in people’s needs. People told us they were involved in reviews of thei

23rd June 2016 - During a routine inspection pdf icon

This inspection took place on 23 June 2016 and was announced.

Family Care Solutions provide care and support to people living in their own homes. At the time of our inspection, the service was supporting primarily older adults living within areas of Stockport and Cheshire. The service was providing support to 58 people at the time of our inspection. The service was not required to have a registered manager. The provider was an individual who had responsibility for the day to day management of the service.

We last inspected the service on 27 January 2014 when the service was registered at a different address. At that time, we found the service was meeting the standards of the regulations inspected. At this inspection, we identified two breaches of the regulations, which were in relation to safe recruitment procedures and taking measures to reduce potential risks. You can see what action we told the provider to take at the back of this report. We made three recommendations, which were in relation to developing systems to monitor the safety and quality of the service, ensuring policies are up to date and recording of complaints.

People spoke positively about the service they received from Family Care Solutions. They told us the service was reliable and friendly and that staff were good. Staff told us they worked with the same people on a consistent basis and this was confirmed by the people we spoke with.

Staff, including managers were able to demonstrate that they knew people very well. We found staff and managers spoke about people in a kind, caring and respectful way.

There were sufficient numbers of staff to ensure all calls could be covered. We received one report of a missed call, however we were told this was not a regular occurrence. People told us staff turned up on time, or that there were only short delays, which could be due to traffic or staff being delayed on the previous call.

There was a generic, pre-populated risk assessment in people’s care files. These had not been personalised to individuals, so it was not clear that full consideration to potential risks had been given. However, we did see that where specific risks had been identified, such as in relation to self-neglect or behaviour that challenged, that additional risk assessments had been put in place.

Staff had received training in a variety of areas including infection control, safeguarding and the Mental Capacity Act. However, there was no recorded practical training in moving and handling and there were not always clear instructions in the care plan for staff to follow in relation to how to hoist people safely. Staff received an induction and were able to shadow more experienced staff until they felt confident prior to starting to lone-work.

People had care plans in place and there was evidence these had been reviewed and updated when required. There was no evidence of regular reviews if no required change had been identified. However, the provider had recently introduced a new electronic care management system, and we saw this had started to be used to help monitor and record when reviews were due or had taken place.

Staff told us they felt well supported and able to approach a manager with any concerns. They spoke highly of the quality of the service Family Care Solutions provided people.

People told us they would be confident to raise a complaint if they felt this was necessary. People we spoke with who told us they had made complaints said that any issues had been resolved quickly and to their satisfaction. The provider had not recorded informal complaints, so it was not possible to see what actions had been taken. They told us they had never received a formal complaint.

We saw staff had had a criminal records check before they started work. However, there were some gaps in records which would help the provider demonstrate that staff’s suitability for the role had been given due consideration. One staff member who had started shad

 

 

Latest Additions: