Attention: The information on this website is currently out of date and should not be relied upon..

Care Services

carehome, nursing and medical services directory


Fen Road, Chesterton, Cambridge.

Fen Road in Chesterton, Cambridge is a Residential home specialising in the provision of services relating to accommodation for persons who require nursing or personal care, caring for adults under 65 yrs, dementia, learning disabilities, physical disabilities and sensory impairments. The last inspection date here was 2nd December 2017

Fen Road is managed by Voyage 1 Limited who are also responsible for 289 other locations

Contact Details:

    Address:
      Fen Road
      71-73 Fen Road
      Chesterton
      Cambridge
      CB4 1UN
      United Kingdom
    Telephone:
      01223425634
    Website:

Ratings:

For a guide to the ratings, click here.

Safe: Good
Effective: Good
Caring: Good
Responsive: Good
Well-Led: Good
Overall: Good

Further Details:

Important Dates:

    Last Inspection 2017-12-02
    Last Published 2017-12-02

Local Authority:

    Cambridgeshire

Link to this page:

    HTML   BBCode

Inspection Reports:

Click the title bar on any of the report introductions below to read the full entry. If there is a PDF icon, click it to download the full report.

18th October 2017 - During a routine inspection pdf icon

Fen Road is registered to provide accommodation for up to 10 people who require personal care. There were seven people with a learning and physical disability living in the home at the time of the inspection. People were accommodated in two bungalows and all bedrooms were single rooms.

This inspection took place on 18 and 19 October 2017 and was unannounced and was the first inspection since Voyage became registered as the provider of this service..

There was a registered manager in place. A registered manager is a person who has registered with the Care Quality Commission to manage the service. Like registered providers, they are ‘registered persons’. Registered persons have legal responsibility for meeting the requirements in the Health and Social Care Act 2008 and associated Regulations about how the service is run.

Staff had taken action to minimise the risks to people. Risk assessments identified risks and identified how to reduce them where possible. Staff were competent to administer medication. They were following the correct procedures when administering, recording and storing medication so that people received their medication as prescribed. Staff were aware of the procedures to follow if they thought anyone had been harmed.

Staff were only employed after the completion of a thorough recruitment procedure. There were enough staff on shift to ensure that people had their needs met in a timely manner. However, the numbers of staff meant that there were not always opportunities for people to take part in activities outside of the home. Staff received the training they required and they were supported in their roles to have the right skills to meet people’s needs.

The CQC is required by law to monitor the Mental Capacity Act (MCA) 2005, Deprivation of Liberty Safeguards (DoLS) and to report on what we find. The provider had completed capacity assessments and DoLS applications.

Staff were kind and caring when working with people. They knew people well and were aware of their history, preferences, likes and dislikes. People’s privacy and dignity was respected and promoted.

Staff monitored people’s health and welfare needs and acted on issues identified. People had been referred to healthcare professionals when needed. People were provided with a choice of food and drink that they enjoyed and they were given the right amount of support to ensure their nutritional needs were met.

Activities were mainly limited to ones that took place within the service. When staffing numbers allowed, staff supported people to maintain their interests and their links with the local community.

Care plans gave staff the information they required to meet people’s care and support needs. People received support in the way that they preferred and met their individual needs.

There was a complaints procedure in place and family members felt confident to raise any concerns either with the staff or registered manager.

There was an effective quality assurance process in place which included obtaining the views of relatives and the staff. Where needed action had been taken to make improvements to the service being offered.

 

 

Latest Additions: