Attention: The information on this website is currently out of date and should not be relied upon..

Care Services

carehome, nursing and medical services directory


Gardiner Crescent Surgery, Pelton Fell, Chester Le Street.

Gardiner Crescent Surgery in Pelton Fell, Chester Le Street is a Doctors/GP specialising in the provision of services relating to diagnostic and screening procedures, family planning services, maternity and midwifery services, services for everyone, surgical procedures and treatment of disease, disorder or injury. The last inspection date here was 19th September 2019

Gardiner Crescent Surgery is managed by Dr Richard Hall.

Contact Details:

    Address:
      Gardiner Crescent Surgery
      21 Gardiner Crescent
      Pelton Fell
      Chester Le Street
      DH2 2NJ
      United Kingdom
    Telephone:
      01913873558

Ratings:

For a guide to the ratings, click here.

Safe: Requires Improvement
Effective: Requires Improvement
Caring: Good
Responsive: Good
Well-Led: Requires Improvement
Overall:

Further Details:

Important Dates:

    Last Inspection 2019-09-19
    Last Published 2018-09-27

Local Authority:

    County Durham

Link to this page:

    HTML   BBCode

Inspection Reports:

Click the title bar on any of the report introductions below to read the full entry. If there is a PDF icon, click it to download the full report.

1st January 1970 - During a routine inspection pdf icon

This practice is rated as Requires Improvement overall. (Previous rating under former provider 01 2017 – Good)

The key questions at this inspection are rated as:

Are services safe? – Requires Improvement

Are services effective? – Requires Improvement

Are services caring? – Good

Are services responsive? – Good

Are services well-led? – Requires Improvement

We carried out an announced comprehensive inspection at Gardiner Crescent Surgery on 22 and 23 August 2018 as part of our inspection programme.

At this inspection we found:

  • Staff demonstrated a very caring approach to their patients and it was clear they treated them with compassion, kindness, dignity and respect.
  • The practice scored well in the National GP Patient Survey across all areas.
  • Clinicians assessed patients’ needs and delivered person-focussed care and treatment.
  • The practice had some systems in place to manage risk, so that safety incidents were less likely to happen. When incidents did happen, the practice learned improved processes to keep patients safe. However, the practice’s arrangements for responding to safety alerts was not sufficient. There were some gaps in the practice’s arrangements for identifying, assessing and managing risk.
  • Staff demonstrated they were committed to making improvements and there was some evidence of this in the quality improvement activity they undertook. However, there was no programme of continuous clinical audit to monitor quality.
  • There were gaps in some staff’s training.
  • Appropriate recruitment checks had not been carried out for some staff who worked at the practice.
  • Patients found the appointment system easy to use and reported that they were able to access care when they needed it.
  • There was some evidence the practice engaged with their patients. However, this was limited and the practice did not have an active patient participation group.

The areas where the provider must make improvements as they are in breach of regulations are:

  • Establish effective systems and processes to ensure good governance, in accordance with the fundamental standards of care.
  • Ensure persons employed in the provision of the regulated activity receive the appropriate support, training, professional development, supervision and appraisal to enable them to carry out their duties.
  • Ensure recruitment procedures are established and operated effectively to ensure only fit and proper persons are employed.

The areas where the provider should make improvements are:

  • Review the process for prescribing antibiotics to conform with best practice.
  • Consider increasing the support provided to carers.
  • Review arrangements for offering the meningitis vaccine to students.
  • Continue to take steps to encourage uptake of annual checks for patients with learning disabilities.
  • Review and improve patient engagement.
  • Reduce those exception reporting rates which are higher than the local clinical commissioning group and England averages.
  • Continue to provide support to ensure the practice management team have the relevant skills to fulfil their roles.

Professor Steve Field CBE FRCP FFPH FRCGPChief Inspector of General Practice

Please refer to the detailed report and the evidence tables for further information.

 

 

Latest Additions: