Attention: The information on this website is currently out of date and should not be relied upon..

Care Services

carehome, nursing and medical services directory


Goldstar Care Services Limited, 28-42 Clements Road, Ilford.

Goldstar Care Services Limited in 28-42 Clements Road, Ilford is a Homecare agencies specialising in the provision of services relating to caring for adults over 65 yrs, caring for adults under 65 yrs, dementia, learning disabilities, mental health conditions, personal care, physical disabilities and sensory impairments. The last inspection date here was 20th October 2018

Goldstar Care Services Limited is managed by Goldstar Care Services Limited.

Contact Details:

Ratings:

For a guide to the ratings, click here.

Safe: Good
Effective: Good
Caring: Good
Responsive: Good
Well-Led: Good
Overall: Good

Further Details:

Important Dates:

    Last Inspection 2018-10-20
    Last Published 2018-10-20

Local Authority:

    Redbridge

Link to this page:

    HTML   BBCode

Inspection Reports:

Click the title bar on any of the report introductions below to read the full entry. If there is a PDF icon, click it to download the full report.

2nd October 2018 - During a routine inspection pdf icon

This inspection took place on 2 October 2018 and was announced. There was no previous inspection since the service was registered with us in July 2017.

Goldstar Care Services Limited provides care and support to people living in their own home. Not everyone using Goldstar Care Services Limited receives regulated activity; the CQC only inspects the service being received by people provided with ‘personal care’; help with tasks related to personal hygiene and eating. Where they do we also take into account any wider social care provided. At the time of our service, there were 18 people using the service, 13 of whom were receiving personal care.

There was a registered manager in place. A registered manager is a person who has registered with the Care Quality Commission to manage the service. Like registered providers, they are ‘registered persons’. Registered persons have legal responsibility for meeting the requirements in the Health and Social Care Act 2008 and associated Regulations about how the service is run.

People spoke positively about the care and support they received from the service and had no concerns about their safety. People who used the service were protected from the risk of abuse because the provider had taken steps to identify the possibility of abuse and prevent abuse from happening. Risks to people and staff were assessed and were reviewed regularly.

The provider undertook all necessary employment checks before newly recruited staff started employment. People were supported by sufficient numbers of staff to meet their individual needs. They were visited by the same group of staff who knew their needs.

The service had an efficient system to manage accidents and incidents and learn from them so they were less likely to happen again. People received their medicines safely as prescribed by their GPs.

People were cared for by staff who were supported to deliver care safely and to an appropriate standard. Staff received regular supervisions with the registered manager to discuss their care practice and identify training needs.

People and their relatives were involved in the assessment and planning of their care and support. Each person had a care plan outlining how staff needed to support them. The care plans were personalised to reflect each person’s preferences, choices and lifestyle. These were regularly reviewed and updated by the registered manager.

People were offered support in a way that upheld their privacy and dignity. They were treated with compassion by staff who knew them well and they encouraged to be as independent as possible.

Staff had undertaken training to support people who did not have capacity to make their own decisions. They were aware of the Mental Capacity Act 2005.

People were supported to eat and drink sufficient amounts to meet their needs. They were encouraged to participate in activities that were meaningful to them.

There were systems in place to monitor the quality of the service and to identify shortfalls or areas for improvement. People who used the service, their representatives and staff were asked for their views about the service and they were acted on. The provider had a process in place to review complaints and comments to improve the service.

 

 

Latest Additions: