Attention: The information on this website is currently out of date and should not be relied upon..

Care Services

carehome, nursing and medical services directory


Henran Lodge, Edmonton, London.

Henran Lodge in Edmonton, London is a Residential home specialising in the provision of services relating to accommodation for persons who require nursing or personal care and mental health conditions. The last inspection date here was 16th August 2019

Henran Lodge is managed by Henran Care Limited.

Contact Details:

    Address:
      Henran Lodge
      4 Warren Crescent
      Edmonton
      London
      N9 9JF
      United Kingdom
    Telephone:
      02082927539

Ratings:

For a guide to the ratings, click here.

Safe: Good
Effective: Good
Caring: Good
Responsive: Good
Well-Led: Good
Overall: Good

Further Details:

Important Dates:

    Last Inspection 2019-08-16
    Last Published 2017-03-30

Local Authority:

    Enfield

Link to this page:

    HTML   BBCode

Inspection Reports:

Click the title bar on any of the report introductions below to read the full entry. If there is a PDF icon, click it to download the full report.

15th March 2017 - During a routine inspection pdf icon

We undertook an unannounced inspection on 15 March 2017. Henran Lodge provides care and support for a maximum of four older people. At the time of the inspection there were three people living at the home.

At the last inspection, the service was rated as Good.

At this inspection we found the service remained as Good.

The service had a registered manager. A registered manager is a person who has registered with the Care Quality Commission to manage the service. Like registered providers, they are 'registered persons'. Registered persons have legal responsibility for meeting the legal requirements in the Health and Social Care Act 2008 and the associated regulations on how the service is run.

Risks had been identified and assessed that provided information on how to mitigate risks to keep people safe.

Medicines were being managed safely.

Staff had the knowledge, training and skills to care for people effectively. Staff received regular training, supervision and support to carry out their roles.

Staff sought people's consent to the care and support they provided. People's rights were protected under the Mental Capacity Act 2005. Deprivation of Liberty safeguarding application had been made for people that, due to their own safety, required supervision when going outside.

People were offered choices during meal times and told us they enjoyed the food.

People were able to access healthcare services and attend routine medical and health monitoring appointments with staff support.

Staff had positive, caring relationships with the people who lived at the home. People were treated in a respectful and dignified manner by staff who understood the need to protect people's human rights.

Activities were being carried out with people.

People were receiving person centred care and care plans were person centred.

Staff felt well supported by the registered manager. Quality assurance and monitoring systems were in place to make continuous improvements.

1st January 1970 - During a routine inspection pdf icon

We undertook this unannounced inspection on 19 & 20 January 2015 of Henran Lodge. Henran Lodge provides care and accommodation for a maximum of four older people with dementia and mental health needs. At this inspection there were two people living in the home. The home was registered in June 2014. This is the first inspection of the home.

The home has a registered manager. A registered manager is a person who has registered with the Care Quality Commission to manage the service. Like registered providers, they are ‘registered persons’. Registered persons have legal responsibility for meeting the requirements of the Health and Social Care Act and associated Regulations about how the service is run.

On both days of the inspection staff were welcoming and people in the home appeared settled and well cared for. People had complex needs and were not able to fully share their experiences of using the service. However, the feedback we received from them via brief replies, nods and gestures indicated they were satisfied with the staff and the care provided. Two social care professionals informed us that people were well cared for and the home was well managed.

We saw staff going about their duties in a calm and orderly manner. They were friendly and interacted with people. There was always at least one staff member in the lounge supervising and engaging people in conversation or in some activity when we inspected.

People’s needs had been carefully assessed and detailed care plans were prepared with the involvement of people and their representatives. Their physical and mental health needs were closely monitored. There were reviews of people’s health and a record of appointments with health and social care professionals. This ensured that they received treatment and support for their individual needs. There were suitable arrangements for the recording, storage, administration and disposal of medicines in the home.

Staff had been carefully recruited and provided with training to enable them to care effectively for people. They demonstrated a good understanding of the needs of people with dementia.

The home had a safeguarding policy and the London guidance document “Protecting Adults at Risk: London Multi-Agency Policy and Procedure to Safeguard Adults from Abuse”. Staff had received training and knew how to recognise and report any concerns or allegation of abuse.

Staff had assessed people’s preferences prior to their admission and arrangements were in place to ensure that these were responded to. The home had residents’ meetings to ensure that people could express their views and their suggestions were addressed.

The home had arrangements for quality assurance. This included a satisfaction survey, checks on medicines, health and safety and care documentation by the registered manager. Professionals who provided us with feedback stated that they were satisfied with the quality of care provided and there were no concerns regarding communication.

We found the premises were clean and had been recently renovated. The home had an Infection control policy and measures were in place for infection prevention and control. The home was well maintained and there was a record of essential inspections of the electrical installations, portable appliances and gas boiler.

 

 

Latest Additions: