Attention: The information on this website is currently out of date and should not be relied upon..

Care Services

carehome, nursing and medical services directory


HM Prison Blantyre House, Horden, Cranbrook.

HM Prison Blantyre House in Horden, Cranbrook is a Prison healthcare and Rehabilitation (illness/injury) specialising in the provision of services relating to substance misuse problems and treatment of disease, disorder or injury. The last inspection date here was 7th November 2013

HM Prison Blantyre House is managed by The Forward Trust who are also responsible for 17 other locations

Contact Details:

    Address:
      HM Prison Blantyre House
      Blantyre House
      Horden
      Cranbrook
      TN17 2NH
      United Kingdom
    Telephone:
      01580213200

Ratings:

For a guide to the ratings, click here.

Safe: No Rating / Under Appeal / Rating Suspended
Effective: No Rating / Under Appeal / Rating Suspended
Caring: No Rating / Under Appeal / Rating Suspended
Responsive: No Rating / Under Appeal / Rating Suspended
Well-Led: No Rating / Under Appeal / Rating Suspended
Overall: No Rating / Under Appeal / Rating Suspended

Further Details:

Important Dates:

    Last Inspection 2013-11-07
    Last Published 2013-11-07

Local Authority:

    Kent

Link to this page:

    HTML   BBCode

Inspection Reports:

Click the title bar on any of the report introductions below to read the full entry. If there is a PDF icon, click it to download the full report.

17th September 2013 - During a themed inspection looking at Offender Healthcare pdf icon

We carried out this inspection in conjunction with Her Majestys Inspectorate of Prisons (HMIP). During our visit we found that prisoners felt respected by staff. They told us that they were involved in discussions with the provider and were given information about what was available to them. One prisoner told us "I was given information about the service when I arrived". We found that consent was gained through both informal and formal processes and staff understood the importance of gaining consent before embarking on any programme of support.

There was a lack of detailed and individualised planning documented within the service and the range of services that prisoners could access was limited at the time of our inspection. There were also some gaps in whole service planning, communication and cohesive approaches to working with the prison service which could have impacted on the effectiveness of any interventions. However, links with other services outside of the prison were in place.

The provider undertook auditing and action planning within the service. This required some improvement through needs analysis and there needed to be more cohesive approaches for ensuring that the service offered was meeting the needs of the prison population. Prisoner feedback was gathered although this required some improvement in terms of wider engagement.

 

 

Latest Additions: