Attention: The information on this website is currently out of date and should not be relied upon..

Care Services

carehome, nursing and medical services directory


Interserve Healthcare - Yorkshire, Arena Point, Merrion Way, Leeds.

Interserve Healthcare - Yorkshire in Arena Point, Merrion Way, Leeds is a Homecare agencies specialising in the provision of services relating to personal care, services for everyone and treatment of disease, disorder or injury. The last inspection date here was 1st February 2020

Interserve Healthcare - Yorkshire is managed by Interserve Healthcare Limited who are also responsible for 11 other locations

Contact Details:

Ratings:

For a guide to the ratings, click here.

Safe: Good
Effective: Good
Caring: Good
Responsive: Requires Improvement
Well-Led: Requires Improvement
Overall:

Further Details:

Important Dates:

    Last Inspection 2020-02-01
    Last Published 2019-01-24

Local Authority:

    Leeds

Link to this page:

    HTML   BBCode

Inspection Reports:

Click the title bar on any of the report introductions below to read the full entry. If there is a PDF icon, click it to download the full report.

2nd November 2018 - During a routine inspection pdf icon

We undertook an announced inspection of Interserve Healthcare Yorkshire 2, 7 and 9 November 2018 and we spoke with people via the telephone and visited people in their homes on 4 and 9 December 2018. This was the first inspection for this service since they registered with the Care Quality Commission in November 2017.

Interserve Healthcare Yorkshire is a domiciliary care service that provides personal care to people living in their own homes. It provides a service to older adults in the Leeds area.

The service had a registered manager. A registered manager is a person who has registered with the Care Quality Commission to manage the service. Like registered providers, they are 'registered persons.' Registered persons have legal responsibility for meeting the requirements in the Health and Social Care Act 2008 and associated Regulations about how the service is run. The registered manager had only been in post a few months at the time of inspection.

Staff received ongoing training from the provider. New staff underwent induction training. However, training records showed some staff’s training records had lapsed.

The quality assurance systems showed how the service continually sought to improve, although, systems had not identified the areas of concern we raised at this inspection.

Care records sometimes lacked important details of how to support people in a specific way to meet their needs.

Staff spoke highly of the teamwork and how supportive colleagues were of each other. Supervisions and appraisals had not always been completed for some staff. We have made a recommendation about this in the report.

The provider had a clear policy and procedure in place for managing complaints. People felt able to raise any issues with any of the staff and were confident these would be addressed. However, we saw evidence some complaints had not followed the providers process.

People were safe as the staff team knew them well. Staff knew how to recognise and respond to any safeguarding concerns, and any learning from such incidents was shared with staff.

Staff made sure risk assessments were in place and took actions to minimise risks without taking away people's right to make decisions. People who had specific nutritional needs were supported to maintain a healthy diet.

People told us there were enough staff to help them when needed. Staff told us there were enough staff to provide safe care and support to people effectively. Advanced planning meant staffing levels were reviewed and reflected the needs of people who used the service.

People's medicines were managed in a safe way. When people required further intervention from medical professionals, staff knew the process to follow to help people with this.

Recruitment was appropriately managed as relevant background checks had been completed prior to employment, to ensure staff were safe to work with vulnerable people.

People were supported to have maximum choice and control of their lives and staff supported them in the least restrictive way possible; the policies and systems in the service supported this practice. The registered manager was aware of current procedures and guidance for best practice, and this was evident in the policies used at the service.

People told us staff understood confidentiality, dignity and respect. We were told staff were very committed to the people they cared for, building a good rapport and taking time to get to know them. Staff ensured people were treated with kindness and compassion, and provided significant emotional support when people became anxious. Privacy and dignity was promoted always.

It was evident the registered manager and their staff team were striving for the best outcomes for people who used the service through utilising the partnerships they had built up with external services.

Staff had a good knowledge of the prevention of infection and told us they were provide with personal protective equipment to use when working with p

 

 

Latest Additions: