Attention: The information on this website is currently out of date and should not be relied upon..

Care Services

carehome, nursing and medical services directory


Kare Plus National, Chapel Ash, Wolverhampton.

Kare Plus National in Chapel Ash, Wolverhampton is a Homecare agencies and Supported living specialising in the provision of services relating to caring for adults over 65 yrs, caring for adults under 65 yrs, dementia, mental health conditions, personal care and sensory impairments. The last inspection date here was 22nd April 2017

Kare Plus National is managed by Kare Plus National Limited.

Contact Details:

    Address:
      Kare Plus National
      8 Tettenhall Road
      Chapel Ash
      Wolverhampton
      WV1 4SA
      United Kingdom
    Telephone:
      01902827700
    Website:

Ratings:

For a guide to the ratings, click here.

Safe: Requires Improvement
Effective: Good
Caring: Good
Responsive: Good
Well-Led: Good
Overall: Good

Further Details:

Important Dates:

    Last Inspection 2017-04-22
    Last Published 2017-04-22

Local Authority:

    Wolverhampton

Link to this page:

    HTML   BBCode

Inspection Reports:

Click the title bar on any of the report introductions below to read the full entry. If there is a PDF icon, click it to download the full report.

15th March 2017 - During a routine inspection pdf icon

This inspection was announced and took place on 15 and 16 March 2017. Kareplus provides personal care to people living in their own homes or in a supported living environment. At the time of our inspection the service was supporting 37 people. This was the services first inspection since they registered with us.

There was not a registered manager in post at the time of the inspection. A registered manager is a person who has registered with the Care Quality Commission to manage the service. Like registered providers, they are ‘registered persons’. Registered persons have legal responsibility for meeting the requirements in the Health and Social Care Act 2008 and associated Regulations about how the service is run. The provider had appointed a new manager who was in post at the time of the inspection and told us they intended to make the necessary application to register themselves.

People mostly received their medicines as prescribed, however two people had experienced times when medicines had not been given at the appropriate times. Medicines recording practices were not always safe, however the manager had identified this and was making the required improvements. People mostly received their calls on time, however they were not always advised when staff were running late. People were supported by sufficient numbers of staff to ensure their safety and needs were met. Staff were safely recruited and people told us they felt safe when receiving support from them. Staff understood people’s risks and how to manage them.

Staff received an induction to their role and the manager had identified staff ongoing training needs and had implemented a plan to refresh staff training. People were asked for their consent before care and support was provided. People who were supported by staff to prepare and cook meals were provided with choices, and staff were aware of people’s specific dietary requirements. People were supported to access healthcare professionals if required.

People told us staff were kind and caring and staff treated them with respect. People were encouraged to make day to day decisions about their care and support. Staff promoted people’s privacy and dignity and encouraged their independence.

People were supported by staff who understood their needs and preferences. People and their relatives were involved in the planning and review of their care. People’s changing care needs were assessed and staff were told when people’s needs changed. People knew how to raise a concern or complaint and there was a system in place to ensure complaints were appropriately managed.

People and their relatives told us the management of the service was improving. The manager had completed an audit of the service which had identified the concerns we found during the inspection. The manager had made good progress in improving the service. Opportunities for people and their relatives to provide feedback had improved. Staff understood their responsibilities and felt supported in their roles. The provider was appropriately notifying us of events they are required to do so by law, such as allegations of abuse.

 

 

Latest Additions: