Attention: The information on this website is currently out of date and should not be relied upon..

Care Services

carehome, nursing and medical services directory


Kepier Medical Practice, Houghton Le Spring.

Kepier Medical Practice in Houghton Le Spring is a Doctors/GP specialising in the provision of services relating to diagnostic and screening procedures, family planning services, maternity and midwifery services, services for everyone, surgical procedures and treatment of disease, disorder or injury. The last inspection date here was 29th March 2016

Kepier Medical Practice is managed by Kepier Medical Practice.

Contact Details:

    Address:
      Kepier Medical Practice
      Leyburn Grove
      Houghton Le Spring
      DH4 5EQ
      United Kingdom
    Telephone:
      01915842106

Ratings:

For a guide to the ratings, click here.

Safe: Good
Effective: Good
Caring: Good
Responsive: Good
Well-Led: Good
Overall: Good

Further Details:

Important Dates:

    Last Inspection 2016-03-29
    Last Published 2016-03-29

Local Authority:

    Sunderland

Link to this page:

    HTML   BBCode

Inspection Reports:

Click the title bar on any of the report introductions below to read the full entry. If there is a PDF icon, click it to download the full report.

20th January 2016 - During a routine inspection pdf icon

Letter from the Chief Inspector of General Practice

We carried out an announced comprehensive inspection at Kepier Medical Practice on 20 January 2016. Overall the practice is rated as good.

Our key findings across all the areas we inspected were as follows:

  • Staff understood and fulfilled their responsibilities to raise concerns, and to report incidents and near misses.
  • Risks to patients were assessed and generally well managed. The exception to this was the practices failure to carry out fire evacuation drills.
  • The practice carried out clinical audit activity and were able to demonstrate improvements to patient care as a result of this.
  • The majority of patients said they were treated with compassion, dignity and respect.
  • Urgent appointments were usually available on the day they were requested.
  • The practice had a number of policies and procedures to govern activity, which were reviewed and updated regularly
  • The practice had proactively sought feedback from patients and had an active patient participation group.
  • Information about services and how to complain was available and easy to understand.
  • The practice was aware of patient dissatisfaction in respect of the appointment system and access to appointments but were taking steps to try and improve.
  • The practice had effective systems in place to support patients with long term conditions. They offered an in house type 2 diabetes insulin initiation service and ensured that patients undergoing initiation were given the mobile phone number for the lead GP for diabetes.

However there were areas of practice where the provider needs to make improvements.

Importantly, the provider should:

  • Carry out annual fire evacuation drills
  • Carry out a risk assessment documenting why it has not been felt necessary for all non-clinical staff to undertake Disclosure and Barring Service (DBS) checks)
  • Obtain suitable references for all newly appointed staff prior to commencement of employment
  • Comply with their own procedure in respect of cleaning/replacing privacy curtains in consultation rooms
  • Safely secure cord/chain mechanisms on vertical blinds to reduce the risk of accidental choking for small children.

Professor Steve Field (CBE FRCP FFPH FRCGP) 

Chief Inspector of General Practice

28th November 2013 - During a routine inspection pdf icon

We spent time observing the way the practice worked and spoke to patients and staff. We spoke with five patients, all felt they could and would recommend the practice, even where they voiced frustrations/issues.

One person told us “I can’t really fault the place” Another person said “The staff are all pleasant”. Generally we found that patients felt that the general practitioners (GPs) and nurses explained things well to them and listened. They also felt they were given choices about treatment options.

We saw the provider had taken reasonable steps to identify the possibility of abuse from happening. The practice was clean and had the appropriate standards of cleanliness. There were systems in place to identify, monitor and manage risks to those using, working in or visiting the service.

We found that the provider had an effective system in place to monitor when training was needed or was due for renewal. Staff were properly supported through basic training and appraisals to perform their roles.

 

 

Latest Additions: