Lapis Domiciliary Care, Shedfield House Dairy, Sandy Lane, Shedfield, Southampton.Lapis Domiciliary Care in Shedfield House Dairy, Sandy Lane, Shedfield, Southampton is a Homecare agencies specialising in the provision of services relating to caring for adults over 65 yrs, caring for adults under 65 yrs, dementia, learning disabilities, personal care, physical disabilities, sensory impairments and treatment of disease, disorder or injury. The last inspection date here was 5th May 2018 Contact Details:
Ratings:For a guide to the ratings, click here. Further Details:Important Dates:
Local Authority:
Link to this page: Inspection Reports:Click the title bar on any of the report introductions below to read the full entry. If there is a PDF icon, click it to download the full report.
16th April 2018 - During a routine inspection
The inspection took place on 16 and 17 April 2018 and was announced. Lapis Domiciliary Care is a care agency. It provides personal care to people living in their own homes. The service is registered to provide care for people living with dementia, learning disabilities or autistic spectrum disorder, older and younger people and people living with a physical disability. At the time of this inspection the service provided care and support to 17 people. The service had a registered manager. A registered manager is a person who has registered with the Care Quality Commission to manage the service. Like registered providers, they are ‘registered persons’. Registered persons have legal responsibility for meeting the requirements in the Health and Social Care Act 2008 and associated Regulations about how the service is run. People were safe because staff understood their role and responsibilities to keep them safe from harm. Staff had received training to deliver care safely and to an appropriate standard. Staff had a good knowledge of the provider’s whistleblowing policy and procedures which meant they were able to raise concerns to protect people from unsafe care. People were supported by staff that promoted their independence, respected their dignity and maintained their privacy. Care plans reflected people's individual needs and preferences and were regularly reviewed to ensure that they continued to meet people's needs. Risks to people had been assessed and reviewed regularly to ensure people’s individual needs were being met safely. Recruitment processes were robust to make sure people were cared for by suitable staff. There were sufficient numbers of staff deployed to meet people’s needs and to keep them safe from harm. Staff understood the requirements of the Mental Capacity Act 2005 and their responsibilities to ensure that people who were unable to make their own decisions about their care and support were protected. There was an effective complaints system in place. People told us they were confident to raise any issues about their care and that they would be listened to and addressed. People told us the service was well-led and managed by an effective and organised management team. Systems were in place to monitor and improve the quality of the service provided.
25th February 2016 - During a routine inspection
The inspection was announced and took place on 25 February 2016. Lapis Domiciliary Care is a domiciliary care service providing care and support to people living in their own homes. At the time of our inspection there were five people using the service. The service has a registered manager. A registered manager is a person who has registered with the Care Quality Commission to manage the service. Like registered providers, they are ‘registered persons’. Registered persons have legal responsibility for meeting the requirements in the Health and Social Care Act 2008 and associated Regulations about how the service is run. People told us they felt safe and were confident in the staff that provided their care and supported them. People were safe because staff understood their role and responsibilities to keep them safe from harm. Staff had a good knowledge of the provider’s whistleblowing policy and procedures which meant they were able to raise concerns to protect people from unsafe care. Recruitment processes were robust to make sure people were cared for by suitable staff. There were sufficient numbers of staff deployed to meet people’s needs. People were supported by staff who received regular training, support and supervision to help them provide effective care. Staff understood the requirements of the Mental Capacity Act 2005 and their responsibilities to ensure that people who were unable to make their own decisions about their care and support were protected.
People had good relationships with the staff and were treated with dignity and respect. There were systems in place to monitor the care provided and people’s views and opinions were sought regularly. There was an effective complaints system in place. People told us they were confident to raise any issues about their care and that they would be listened to and addressed. People told us the service was well-led and managed by an effective and organised management team. People had confidence in the provider and staff were clear about their roles and responsibilities.
|
Latest Additions:
|
©2019 Care Services, all rights reserved. No part of this website may be reproduced without permission of the copyright holders.
