Attention: The information on this website is currently out of date and should not be relied upon..

Care Services

carehome, nursing and medical services directory


L’Arche London Gothic Lodge, London.

L’Arche London Gothic Lodge in London is a Residential home specialising in the provision of services relating to accommodation for persons who require nursing or personal care, learning disabilities and physical disabilities. The last inspection date here was 10th February 2018

L’Arche London Gothic Lodge is managed by L'Arche who are also responsible for 15 other locations

Contact Details:

    Address:
      L’Arche London Gothic Lodge
      21 Idmiston Road
      London
      SE27 9HG
      United Kingdom
    Telephone:
      02087618044
    Website:

Ratings:

For a guide to the ratings, click here.

Safe: Good
Effective: Good
Caring: Good
Responsive: Good
Well-Led: Good
Overall: Good

Further Details:

Important Dates:

    Last Inspection 2018-02-10
    Last Published 2018-02-10

Local Authority:

    Lambeth

Link to this page:

    HTML   BBCode

Inspection Reports:

Click the title bar on any of the report introductions below to read the full entry. If there is a PDF icon, click it to download the full report.

12th December 2017 - During a routine inspection pdf icon

L’Arche London Gothic Lodge is a care home. People in care homes receive accommodation and nursing or personal care as single package under one contractual agreement. CQC regulates both the premises and the care provided, and both were looked at during this inspection. The home is registered to provide support to a maximum of five people. At the time of the inspection there were five people using the service.

The care service has been developed and designed in line with the values that underpin the Registering the Right Support and other best practice guidance. These values include choice, promotion of independence and inclusion. People with learning disabilities and autism using the service can live as ordinary a life as any citizen.

At the last inspection in November 2015 we rated the service ‘Good’ overall. At this inspection the service remains ‘Good’.

The service continued to have systems and processes in place to protect people against the risk of harm and abuse. Staff received safeguarding training that enabled them to identify report and escalate suspected abuse and keep people safe.

The service had developed risk management plans that were regularly reviewed and detailed identified risks and strategies on how to manage those risks. Staff were aware of the importance of familiarising themselves with risk management plans and these were updated to reflect people’s changing needs.

The provider demonstrated good practice in the administration, recording and storage of medicines. Medicine administration records were completed accurately and stocks and balances identified people received their medicines as prescribed.

People continued to be protected against the risk of infection, as the service had sufficient infection control plans in place. The service employed ancillary staff who ensured a deep clean of the property was undertaken twice monthly, in addition to daily cleaning. Staff were aware of the importance of ensuring Personal Protective Equipment (PPE) was used to minimise the risk of cross contamination.

People are supported to have maximum choice and control of their lives and staff do support them in the least restrictive way possible; the policies and systems in the service do support this practice. Staff had a comprehensive understanding of the Mental Capacity Act 2005 (MCA) and Deprivation of Liberty Safeguards (DoLS). At the time of the inspection there were five people subject to a standard DoLS authorisation.

People were supported by staff that had undergone pre-employment checks to ensure their suitability. Staffing levels were flexible and ensured people’s needs were met in a safe manner. Training systems in place ensured staff had the right skills and knowledge to deliver effective care to people. Records confirmed staff training covered safeguarding, Mental Capacity Act 2005, deprivation of liberty safeguards, food hygiene, health and safety and medicines management. Where identified training had expired, the provider had booked refresher training.

People were supported to have access to sufficient amounts of food and drink that met both their dietary needs and preferences. People were supported to participate in the purchasing of food and meal preparation wherever possible. People who required specialist dietary requirements were catered for.

The service encouraged and empowered people to access healthcare services to monitor, maintain and enhance their healthcare needs. Records confirmed people had access to G.P, psychiatrists, psychologist, dentist, optician and learning disability specialists. A healthcare professional commented that the service will work with them to ensure people’s healthcare needs were met.

The service carried out adaptions to the property to ensure people’s needs were effectively met. For example, adaptions to bathrooms were made to ensure those with mobility issues and aids, could access the facilities safely and freely.

People were supported in a caring

25th August 2015 - During a routine inspection pdf icon

This inspection took place on 25 August 2015 and was unannounced. L'Arche Lambeth Gothic Lodge is a residential care home providing accommodation, care and support for up to five people with a learning disability. At the time of our inspection five people were using the service.

The L’Arche Lambeth Gothic Lodge has 22 staff , that work across three services, of which this is one.

The service had a registered manager. At the time of the inspection the registered manager was not at work and a manager from another service and a senior manager were providing cover for her role.

A registered manager is a person who has registered with the Care Quality Commission to manage the service. Like registered providers, they are ‘registered persons’. Registered persons have legal responsibility for meeting the requirements in the Health and Social Care Act 2008 and associated Regulations about how the service is run.

People were provided with care that kept them safe from harm and injury. Staff supported people to identify any risks to their safety and helped them to manage these risks. Staffing levels ensured people received the support they required. People knew the staff team well and got to know new members of staff before they started supporting them. Staff undertook regular health and safety checks to maintain a safe environment for people.

Staff were knowledgeable and had skills to meet people’s care needs. They attended relevant training courses to ensure that people were provided with individual support. Staff assessed people’s capacity on a daily basis and provided them with informed choices to ensure that they were involved in their care planning. People were supported to eat and drink what they liked and were encouraged to cook meals for themselves. Staff obtained additional professional support to meet people’s health needs.

People liked their home and had good relationships with the staff. Staff knew people’s preferences and supported them to make choices according to what they wanted. People had support to maintain relationships in the community and were encouraged to have visitors in their home. Staff used people’s preferred communication methods to ensure that their wishes were heard and acted on. People were supported to access advocacy services.

People were provided with support to make decisions for themselves whenever possible. People had one-to-one meetings with staff and were encouraged to discuss their care needs and how they wished to be supported. Staff supported people to plan their personal goals and supported them to achieve those goals. People were provided with support to make a complaint if they wished to. Families and advocates provided feedback about the service and felt that issues raised were addressed.

The management team monitored the quality of care provided and made changes to improve it. The management team had good communication with staff and advised them where required. Staff were supported to question practice and make suggestions when they felt improvements were required. We saw that some medicines errors did not have follow-up actions identified to prevent this happening again. The management team was updating the medicines management procedures to ensure that people received the support they required with safe medicines management. Staff shared information amongst the team to ensure that people were consistently supported in line with their needs.

25th September 2013 - During a routine inspection pdf icon

People's views and experiences were taken into account in the way the service was provided and delivered in relation to their care. This was because the provider had supported people to communicate their choices.

Care and treatment was planned and delivered in a way that was intended to ensure people's safety and welfare. People's care was personalised to include their needs and preferences. People had been supported to maintain their physical health.

People were protected from the risks of inadequate nutrition and dehydration, and had a choice of meals and an opportunity to take part in shopping and meal preparation. One person told us they liked to have fish and chips each Friday and records showed that this was done.

People who used the service, staff and visitors were protected against the risks of unsafe or unsuitable premises as Gothic Lodge was well maintained and homely.

There were enough qualified, skilled and experienced staff to meet people's needs and we saw kind and respectful interaction between staff and people who used the service.

There was an effective complaints system available and this was adapted to the needs of people with a learning disability so it was easier for them to understand and use. We found that people had been given opportunities to raise any concerns they had.

22nd August 2012 - During a routine inspection pdf icon

People had significant communication needs but were able to express satisfaction with the support they were receiving. For example one person had recently had a clothing makeover assisted by the manager and members of her family and she was clearly happy about her new look.

Staff told us how they worked with people to aid their communication and to help them to make choices. This had enabled people to contribute their views and ideas.

 

 

Latest Additions: