Attention: The information on this website is currently out of date and should not be relied upon..

Care Services

carehome, nursing and medical services directory


LDS Maghull, Maghull, Liverpool.

LDS Maghull in Maghull, Liverpool is a Dentist specialising in the provision of services relating to diagnostic and screening procedures, services for everyone, surgical procedures and treatment of disease, disorder or injury. The last inspection date here was 17th September 2013

LDS Maghull is managed by Dr. Marius McGovern who are also responsible for 1 other location

Contact Details:

Ratings:

For a guide to the ratings, click here.

Safe: No Rating / Under Appeal / Rating Suspended
Effective: No Rating / Under Appeal / Rating Suspended
Caring: No Rating / Under Appeal / Rating Suspended
Responsive: No Rating / Under Appeal / Rating Suspended
Well-Led: No Rating / Under Appeal / Rating Suspended
Overall: No Rating / Under Appeal / Rating Suspended

Further Details:

Important Dates:

    Last Inspection 2013-09-17
    Last Published 2013-09-17

Local Authority:

    Sefton

Link to this page:

    HTML   BBCode

Inspection Reports:

Click the title bar on any of the report introductions below to read the full entry. If there is a PDF icon, click it to download the full report.

11th July 2013 - During an inspection to make sure that the improvements required had been made pdf icon

We carried out this inspection to check if the service had made improvements to the way it monitored the medication for medical emergencies.

We found that the medication was stored securely and the approach to how it was checked had been revised. We observed that all medication had been checked consistently each month and expiry dates had not been exceeded.

Patients were not available for us to speak with during the inspection.

4th March 2013 - During a routine inspection pdf icon

Patients were not available to talk with us during our inspection. However, processes were in place to seek patient feedback about the service. The feedback we looked at was mainly positive. Comments by patients on the feedback forms included, “They [the staff] talk to you and are friendly” and there was “consultation throughout” the treatment. Staff provided us with examples of the action they had taken based on feedback which suggested areas for improvement.

Patient consent was sought prior to treatment. Records were maintained of each patient’s dental plan and the discussions with the patient about the plan.

Arrangements were in place for managing medical emergencies. We observed that the majority of the drugs held at the practice for medical emergencies had exceeded their expiry date.

A process was in place for the decontamination of reusable dental instruments which was in accordance with infection control guidance for dentistry. In addition, safety measures were in place for the use of diagnostic x-ray equipment.

A process for managing patient complaints was established. Arrangements were established for staff to receive an annual appraisal of their performance and to participate in ongoing training and development.

 

 

Latest Additions: