Attention: The information on this website is currently out of date and should not be relied upon..

Care Services

carehome, nursing and medical services directory


Link Community Care (Tottenham), 25 Ashley Road, London.

Link Community Care (Tottenham) in 25 Ashley Road, London is a Homecare agencies specialising in the provision of services relating to dementia, eating disorders, personal care, physical disabilities, sensory impairments and services for everyone. The last inspection date here was 23rd January 2018

Link Community Care (Tottenham) is managed by Link Community Care Limited.

Contact Details:

    Address:
      Link Community Care (Tottenham)
      Unit 3E Berol House
      25 Ashley Road
      London
      N17 9LJ
      United Kingdom
    Telephone:
      02030316499

Ratings:

For a guide to the ratings, click here.

Safe: Good
Effective: Good
Caring: Good
Responsive: Good
Well-Led: Good
Overall: Good

Further Details:

Important Dates:

    Last Inspection 2018-01-23
    Last Published 2018-01-23

Local Authority:

    Haringey

Link to this page:

    HTML   BBCode

Inspection Reports:

Click the title bar on any of the report introductions below to read the full entry. If there is a PDF icon, click it to download the full report.

10th November 2017 - During a routine inspection pdf icon

This inspection took place on 10 and 11 November 2017. The provider was given 48 hours' notice because the location provides a domiciliary care service. At the time of the inspection Link Community Care provided domiciliary care and support for 25 people in their own home. The service worked primarily with older people all of whom were living in the same London borough.

This was the first inspection of the service since registration in August 2016.

This service is a domiciliary care agency. It provides personal care to people living in their own houses and flats in the community. It provides a service to older adults and younger disabled adults.

Not everyone using Link Community Care receives regulated activity; CQC only inspects the service being received by people provided with ‘personal care’; help with tasks related to personal hygiene and eating. Where they do we also take into account any wider social care provided.

There was a registered manager in post. A registered manger is a person who has registered with the Care Quality Commission to manage the service and has the legal responsibility for meeting the requirements of law; as does the provider. The registered manager was present during the inspection.

Procedures relating to safeguarding people from harm were in place. Staff we spoke with understood what to do and who to report it to if people were at risk of harm. Staff had an understanding of the systems in place to protect people who could not make decisions and were aware of the legal requirements outlined in the Mental Capacity Act 2005.

The service operated safe staff recruitment procedures and ensured that all staff were suitable for the role before beginning any care work.

Medicines were managed safely and the service was expanding on the number of people that they thought may benefit from staff prompting people to remind them to take medicines.

Risk assessments provided staff with guidance on how to mitigate people’s individual personal risks. Risks had been clearly identified and risk reduction measures were identified and acted upon.

Staff were provided with a suitable induction as well as on-going regular training and supervision to support them in their role.

People were involved in planning their care and had regular reviews to gain their opinion on how things were. Staff knew people well and people and relatives felt that they were treated with dignity and respect. Care plans were person centred and included information on how people wanted their care to be delivered as well as their likes and dislikes.

People and relatives were provided with information on how to make a complaint and their views were obtained and acted upon. People were treated with dignity and respect and trusted the staff that supported them.

People who used the service, relatives and stakeholders had a range of opportunities to provide their views about the quality of the service and the provider monitored the performance of the service.

Further information is in the detailed findings below.

 

 

Latest Additions: