Attention: The information on this website is currently out of date and should not be relied upon..

Care Services

carehome, nursing and medical services directory


LIVES Headquarters, Boston Road Industrial Estate, Horncastle.

LIVES Headquarters in Boston Road Industrial Estate, Horncastle is a Ambulance specialising in the provision of services relating to services for everyone, transport services, triage and medical advice provided remotely and treatment of disease, disorder or injury. The last inspection date here was 9th March 2018

LIVES Headquarters is managed by Lincolnshire Integrated Voluntary Emergency Service.

Contact Details:

    Address:
      LIVES Headquarters
      5-8 Birch Court
      Boston Road Industrial Estate
      Horncastle
      LN9 6SB
      United Kingdom
    Telephone:
      0

Ratings:

For a guide to the ratings, click here.

Safe: No Rating / Under Appeal / Rating Suspended
Effective: No Rating / Under Appeal / Rating Suspended
Caring: No Rating / Under Appeal / Rating Suspended
Responsive: No Rating / Under Appeal / Rating Suspended
Well-Led: No Rating / Under Appeal / Rating Suspended
Overall: No Rating / Under Appeal / Rating Suspended

Further Details:

Important Dates:

    Last Inspection 2018-03-09
    Last Published 2018-03-09

Local Authority:

    Lincolnshire

Link to this page:

    HTML   BBCode

Inspection Reports:

Click the title bar on any of the report introductions below to read the full entry. If there is a PDF icon, click it to download the full report.

16th January 2018 - During a routine inspection pdf icon

LIVES Headquarters is operated by Lincolnshire Integrated Voluntary Emergency Service and is registered to provide patient transport services, triage and medical advice remotely and the treatment of disease, disorder or injury.

We inspected this service using our comprehensive inspection methodology. We carried out an announced inspection on 16 January 2018.

The ambulance service provided patient transport services as well as bespoke first aid and medical cover to public events including treatment on the event site (this is not a regulated activity and is therefore not included in this report). The care and treatment provided when transporting patients between locations and to a hospital is regulated and was the focus of our inspection. To get to the heart of patients’ experiences of care and treatment, we ask the same five questions of all services: are they safe, effective, caring, responsive to people's needs, and well-led?

Throughout the inspection, we took account of what people told us and how the provider understood and complied with the Mental Capacity Act 2005.

The main service provided by LIVES was patient transport. Where our findings on patient transport services – for example, management arrangements – also apply to other services, we do not repeat the information but cross-refer to the patient transport services core service. See patient transport services for main findings.

Services we do not rate

We regulate independent ambulance services but we do not currently have a legal duty to rate them. We highlight good practice and issues that service providers need to improve and take regulatory action as necessary.

We found the following areas of good practice:

  • Incidents were reported and any learning was shared.
  • Comprehensive policies were in place covering all aspects of safe and effective patient care and treatment.
  • Medicines management was robust.
  • The ambulance and equipment were clean, well maintained and serviced regularly.
  • Staff were trained to deliver care and treatment following current clinical guidance and showing compassion and empathy to patients.
  • Staff responded to patient’s individual needs.
  • The organisation was well-led and had a strong patient focussed ethos with processes in place to promote clear clinical governance.
  • The senior leadership team were able to respond quickly to any issues in order to improve outcomes for patients.

Heidi Smoult

Deputy Chief Inspector of Hospitals (Central), on behalf of the Chief Inspector of Hospitals

1st January 1970 - During a routine inspection pdf icon

We were unable to speak with people who use the service due to confidentiality issues.

We saw patient feedback from a recent patient survey. People had responded positively to questions about their experience. One comment read, "It was reassuring to have someone to arrive so quickly to help". Another comment read, "Very professional, caring attitide, good explanation of checks and communictaion skills."

We saw people’s health, safety and welfare was protected when more than one provider was involved in their care and treatment, or when they moved between different services. This was because the provider worked in co-operation with others.

We saw the equipment kits provided to first responders were fit for purpose. We saw people were protected from unsafe or unsuitable equipment because the provider ensured the equipment was properly maintained and first responders made regular safety checks.

We saw there were policies to protect people from the risk of their personal information being shared inappropriately with others.

 

 

Latest Additions: