We inspected this service on 1 and 4 May 2018. The first day was unannounced and the second day was announced. Manor House is a 70 bedded 'care home'. People in care homes receive accommodation and nursing or personal care as single package under one contractual agreement. CQC regulates both the premises and the care provided, and both were looked at during this inspection. The service comprises of two floors, each of which have separate adapted facilities. On the day of our inspection there were 19 people occupying ground floor unit.

This was our first inspection at the service since the current registered provider took this service over in March 2017. The new provider made a decision that the service will only continue to provide accommodation with personal care and they ceased delivery of nursing care in January 2018. When people had nursing needs, such as management of diabetes, these were met by the local district nurses’ team.

At this inspection we found the service was Good in all domains and Good overall.

There was a registered manager running the service. A registered manager is a person who has registered with the Care Quality Commission to manage the service. Like registered providers, they are ‘registered persons’. Registered persons have legal responsibility for meeting the requirements in the Health and Social Care Act 2008 and associated Regulations about how the service is run.

Manor House had a clear management structure supported by a team of committed staff. Following the departure of nursing staff a new senior team including a new deputy manager and team leaders has been recruited. The provider ensured additional support such as medicines training was provided to staff, so the transition to medicines being managed by senior carers was smooth. Feedback from people, families, professionals, and staff reflected the changes at the service had been managed well and did not have any impact on quality of care delivered to people.

People and relatives were encouraged to raise their opinions and they were listened to. The team aimed to provide a good quality of care and the registered provider had systems to monitor the quality of the service provided to review and improve if needed.

People were safe. Staff knew how to report safeguarding concerns and they were confident any concerns would have been promptly escalated by the management. People’s care files contained risk assessments surrounding people’s well-being and individual conditions. Where people had been identified as at risk, management plans guided staff on how to keep the person safe.

People were supported by sufficient number of suitable skilled staff and received support in an unhurried manner. Staff received good support and complimented the provision of training.

The Care Quality Commission (CQC) is required by law to monitor the operation of the Mental Capacity Act 2005 (MCA) and the Deprivation of Liberty Safeguards (DoLS) and report on what we find. People were supported to have maximum choice and control of their lives and staff supported them in the least restrictive way possible; the policies and systems in the service supported this practice. People’s rights to make their own decisions were respected.

People were supported to meet their health and well-being needs. The team worked with external health and social care professionals where required. People were supported to maintain a good diet. People were supported appropriately by trained and competent staff to take their medicines as prescribed.

The service was caring and people’s individual needs, including equality and diversity needs were respected. People were provided with a choice of activities, according to their needs, choices and preferences. These included one to one or group activities, outings and maintaining links with the local community.

People received support that met their needs and staff knew people’s needs well. The provider identified people’s care plans needed