Attention: The information on this website is currently out of date and should not be relied upon..

Care Services

carehome, nursing and medical services directory


Margaret Laurie House Inpatient Rehabilitation Unit, Reigate.

Margaret Laurie House Inpatient Rehabilitation Unit in Reigate is a Rehabilitation (illness/injury) specialising in the provision of services relating to assessment or medical treatment for persons detained under the 1983 act, caring for adults under 65 yrs, caring for people whose rights are restricted under the mental health act, mental health conditions and treatment of disease, disorder or injury. The last inspection date here was 5th November 2013

Margaret Laurie House Inpatient Rehabilitation Unit is managed by Surrey and Borders Partnership NHS Foundation Trust who are also responsible for 18 other locations

Contact Details:

    Address:
      Margaret Laurie House Inpatient Rehabilitation Unit
      1 Church Road
      Reigate
      RH2 8HY
      United Kingdom
    Telephone:
      03005555222
    Website:

Ratings:

For a guide to the ratings, click here.

Safe: No Rating / Under Appeal / Rating Suspended
Effective: No Rating / Under Appeal / Rating Suspended
Caring: No Rating / Under Appeal / Rating Suspended
Responsive: No Rating / Under Appeal / Rating Suspended
Well-Led: No Rating / Under Appeal / Rating Suspended
Overall: No Rating / Under Appeal / Rating Suspended

Further Details:

Important Dates:

    Last Inspection 2013-11-05
    Last Published 0000-00-00

Local Authority:

    Surrey

Link to this page:

    HTML   BBCode

Inspection Reports:

Click the title bar on any of the report introductions below to read the full entry. If there is a PDF icon, click it to download the full report.

14th August 2013 - During a routine inspection pdf icon

We were accompanied by an expert by experience who talked with people who used the service to gain their views.

People shared with the expert that they had their care and support explained to them before they came to the unit; that they had been involved in drawing up and had contributed to their care plans; that their suggestions were taken on board; there were enough staff; they felt safe and their rooms were comfortable.

We found that people’s privacy, dignity and independence were respected and promoted.

We found people who used the service received care, treatment and support in a way that met their needs and protected their rights.

We saw that people who used the service were protected from the risk of abuse, because the provider had taken reasonable steps to identify the possibility of abuse and prevent abuse from happening.

We found that although the building was in reasonable decorative condition, it was not adequately maintained. Therefore people who used the service, staff and visitors were not always protected against the risks of unsafe or unsuitable premises.

We also found that although people were asked for their views about their care and treatment and these were acted on, the Trust did not have an effective system in place to identify, assess, monitor and manage risks to health, safety and welfare.

 

 

Latest Additions: