Attention: The information on this website is currently out of date and should not be relied upon..

Care Services

carehome, nursing and medical services directory


MASTA Travel Clinic - Reading, Centurion Court, 64 London Road, Reading.

MASTA Travel Clinic - Reading in Centurion Court, 64 London Road, Reading is a Doctors/GP specialising in the provision of services relating to diagnostic and screening procedures, services for everyone and treatment of disease, disorder or injury. The last inspection date here was 13th December 2019

MASTA Travel Clinic - Reading is managed by MASTA Limited who are also responsible for 18 other locations

Contact Details:

    Address:
      MASTA Travel Clinic - Reading
      BUPA Centre Reading
      Centurion Court
      64 London Road
      Reading
      RG1 5AS
      United Kingdom
    Telephone:
      03301004134
    Website:

Ratings:

For a guide to the ratings, click here.

Safe: No Rating / Under Appeal / Rating Suspended
Effective: No Rating / Under Appeal / Rating Suspended
Caring: No Rating / Under Appeal / Rating Suspended
Responsive: No Rating / Under Appeal / Rating Suspended
Well-Led: No Rating / Under Appeal / Rating Suspended
Overall: No Rating / Under Appeal / Rating Suspended

Further Details:

Important Dates:

    Last Inspection 2019-12-13
    Last Published 2018-03-28

Local Authority:

    Reading

Link to this page:

    HTML   BBCode

Inspection Reports:

Click the title bar on any of the report introductions below to read the full entry. If there is a PDF icon, click it to download the full report.

27th February 2018 - During a routine inspection pdf icon

We carried out an announced comprehensive inspection on 27 February 2018 to ask the service the following key questions; Are services safe, effective, caring, responsive and well-led?

Our findings were:

Are services safe?

We found that this service was providing safe care in accordance with the relevant regulations.

Are services effective?

We found that this service was providing effective care in accordance with the relevant regulations.

Are services caring?

We found that this service was providing caring services in accordance with the relevant regulations.

Are services responsive?

We found that this service was providing responsive care in accordance with the relevant regulations.

Are services well-led?

We found that this service was providing well-led care in accordance with the relevant regulations.

We carried out this inspection under Section 60 of the Health and Social Care Act 2008 as part of our regulatory functions. This inspection was planned to check whether the service was meeting the legal requirements and regulations associated with the Health and Social Care Act 2008.

The senior travel clinic nurse is the registered manager. A registered manager is a person who is registered with the Care Quality Commission to manage the service. Like registered providers, they are ‘registered persons’. Registered persons have legal responsibility for meeting the requirements in the Health and Social Care Act 2008 and associated Regulations about how the service is run.

MASTA Travel Clinic Reading provides pre-travel assessments, travel vaccinations and travel health advice.

This service is registered with CQC under the Health and Social Care Act 2008 in respect of some, but not all, of the services it provides. There are some exemptions from regulation by CQC which relate to particular types of service and these are set out in Schedule 2 of The Health and Social Care Act 2008 (Regulated Activities) Regulations 2014. Any occupational health related services provided to clients under a contractual arrangement through their employer or government department are exempt by law from CQC regulation. Therefore, they did not fall into the scope of our inspection.

As part of our inspection we asked for Care Quality Commission comment cards to be completed by clients prior to our inspection visit. We received six comment cards, all of which were positive about the standard of care received.

Our key findings were:

  • Systems were in place to protect people from avoidable harm and abuse. When mistakes occurred lessons were learned.
  • There were effective arrangements in place for the management of vaccines and medicines.
  • The service had arrangements in place to respond to medical emergencies.
  • Staff were aware of current evidence based guidance. Staff had been trained to provide them with the skills and knowledge to deliver effective care and treatment.
  • Client survey information and Care Quality Commission (CQC) comment cards reviewed indicated that clients were very satisfied with the service they received. Clients commented that they were treated with compassion, dignity and respect and were involved in their care and decisions about their treatment.
  • Information about the service and how to complain was available.
  • There was a clear leadership structure and staff felt supported by management and worked very well together as a team. The provider was aware of and complied with the Duty of Candour.
  • There was an additional safety mechanism on the service’s computer system which automatically selected appropriate vaccinations and ensured only in date vaccinations were administered and correct serial numbers recorded.
  • Clients were given a travel health passport that contained a record of any vaccinations, useful information and contacts for when they were abroad. This included advice about drinking water and food and what to do if a client was bitten by animals or insects, which may pose a risk of infection or disease.
  • The premises were appropriate to the service delivered and were easily accessible to clients with mobility and sensory difficulties.

 

 

Latest Additions: