Attention: The information on this website is currently out of date and should not be relied upon..

Care Services

carehome, nursing and medical services directory


Mildmay Oaks, Winchfield, Hook.

Mildmay Oaks in Winchfield, Hook is a Hospitals - Mental health/capacity specialising in the provision of services relating to assessment or medical treatment for persons detained under the 1983 act, caring for adults under 65 yrs, caring for children (0 - 18yrs), caring for people whose rights are restricted under the mental health act, learning disabilities, mental health conditions and treatment of disease, disorder or injury. The last inspection date here was 19th March 2020

Mildmay Oaks is managed by Partnerships in Care Limited who are also responsible for 38 other locations

Contact Details:

    Address:
      Mildmay Oaks
      Odiham Road
      Winchfield
      Hook
      RG27 8BS
      United Kingdom
    Telephone:
      01252845826

Ratings:

For a guide to the ratings, click here.

Safe: Requires Improvement
Effective: Requires Improvement
Caring: Good
Responsive: Good
Well-Led: Requires Improvement
Overall:

Further Details:

Important Dates:

    Last Inspection 2020-03-19
    Last Published 2018-07-30

Local Authority:

    Hampshire

Link to this page:

    HTML   BBCode

Inspection Reports:

Click the title bar on any of the report introductions below to read the full entry. If there is a PDF icon, click it to download the full report.

1st January 1970 - During a routine inspection pdf icon

We rated Mildmay Oaks Independent Hospital as requires improvement because:

  • Agency staff were not trained to the standard set out in the staff training policy. We did not know how many agency staff this affected because the training records were not up to date.
  • Staff did not receive training which met patients’ needs.
  • Staff were not receiving regular supervision and support.
  • Patients on Winchfield ward were not protected from the risk of adverse side effects from medicines that were administered as the provider was not following its own protocol or national guidance post use of rapid tranquilisation.
  • Patients on Winchfield ward were not protected from the risks associated with blind spots which were not mitigated.
  • Ligature risk assessment management plans were generic and not detailed.
  • The clinic room on Winchfield ward was not well maintained and not all emergency equipment and medication was available.
  • The provider did not have a clear overview of the frequency of prone restraints.
  • Patients’ property in the store room on Winchfield ward was not kept safe or looked after by staff.

However:

  • Ward managers were able to adjust staffing levels when necessary to ensure patient safety and meet their needs appropriately.
  • Patients had access to a range of psychological therapies. Therapies offered to patients were delivered on a one-to-one and group basis depending upon the needs of the patient.
  • Patients were treated kindly by staff and felt involved in their care.
  • The facilities promoted recovery, comfort and dignity and there was a good range of activities on and off the wards.
  • Staff morale across the hospital was good and staff felt supported by the senior team.
  • Learning from incidents was shared with staff. Incidents were discussed at clinical governance and health and safety meetings and the learning was shared with staff teams.

 

 

Latest Additions: