Attention: The information on this website is currently out of date and should not be relied upon..

Care Services

carehome, nursing and medical services directory


Nightowls Home Care, Marks Tey, Colchester.

Nightowls Home Care in Marks Tey, Colchester is a Homecare agencies specialising in the provision of services relating to caring for adults over 65 yrs, dementia, mental health conditions, personal care, physical disabilities and sensory impairments. The last inspection date here was 4th July 2019

Nightowls Home Care is managed by Nightowls Home Care Limited.

Contact Details:

    Address:
      Nightowls Home Care
      8 Ley Field
      Marks Tey
      Colchester
      CO6 1LZ
      United Kingdom
    Telephone:
      01206521008

Ratings:

For a guide to the ratings, click here.

Safe: Requires Improvement
Effective: Requires Improvement
Caring: Good
Responsive: Good
Well-Led: Requires Improvement
Overall:

Further Details:

Important Dates:

    Last Inspection 2019-07-04
    Last Published 2018-05-25

Local Authority:

    Essex

Link to this page:

    HTML   BBCode

Inspection Reports:

Click the title bar on any of the report introductions below to read the full entry. If there is a PDF icon, click it to download the full report.

20th April 2018 - During a routine inspection pdf icon

This was the registered provider’s first inspection since being registered with the Care Quality Commission on 25 June 2015.

Nightowls Home Care is a domiciliary care agency. It provides personal care to people living in their own houses and flats. It provides a service for older adults living within Colchester and Mersea Island. The domiciliary care agency office is situated in Marks Tey and based within the registered provider’s home.

This inspection was undertaken on the 20, 26 and 27 April 2018. At the time of the inspection 33 people were receiving a domiciliary care service from Nightowls Home Care.

The registered provider was also the registered manager. A registered manager is a person who has registered with the Care Quality Commission to manage the service. Like registered providers, they are ‘registered persons’. Registered persons have legal responsibility for meeting the requirements in the Health and Social Care Act 2008 and associated Regulations about how the service is run.

Staff recruitment practices required significant strengthening as not all records had been sought. Newly employed staff had not received a comprehensive induction and improvements were required to ensure all staff attained up-to-date refresher training and received practical manual handling training.

Effective and robust governance arrangements were not in place to assess and monitor the quality of the service. Quality assurance systems did not identify the issues we found during our inspection to help drive and make all of the necessary improvements required to achieve compliance with the fundamental standards and the registered provider’s own policies and procedures. The fundamental standards are the standards which care provided by the domiciliary care service must not fall below.

Although there was no impact to suggest that people’s care and support needs were not being met, not all risks to people’s health, welfare and safety had been identified and improvements were required to guide staff in the steps they should take to mitigate risks to ensure people’s safety and wellbeing.

Suitable arrangements were in place to keep people safe. Policies and procedures were followed by staff to safeguard people and staff understood these measures. The service was appropriately staffed to meet the needs of people using the service. The management of medicines ensured people’s safety and wellbeing.

Suitable arrangements were in place for staff to receive regular formal supervision. People’s nutritional and hydration needs were met. People received appropriate healthcare support as and when needed and staff knew what to do to summon assistance. The service worked together with other organisations to ensure people received coordinated care and support. People were supported to have choice and control of their lives.

People using the service and those acting on their behalf were very complimentary regarding the service provided. People were treated with care, kindness, dignity and respect. People received a good level of care and support that met their needs and preferences. Staff had a good knowledge and understanding of people’s specific care and support needs and how they wished to be cared for and supported. There was a positive culture within the service that was person-centred, open and inclusive.

Support plans were in place to reflect how people would like to receive their care and support, and covered all aspects of a person's individual circumstances. Information about how to make a complaint was available and people’s representatives told us they were confident to raise issues or concerns.

We have made recommendations about the management of risk and robust inductions for newly appointed staff being in place.

You can see what action we told the provider to take at the back of the full version of the report.

 

 

Latest Additions: