Attention: The information on this website is currently out of date and should not be relied upon..

Care Services

carehome, nursing and medical services directory


Norheads Lane Surgery, Biggin Hill, Westerham.

Norheads Lane Surgery in Biggin Hill, Westerham is a Doctors/GP specialising in the provision of services relating to diagnostic and screening procedures, family planning services, maternity and midwifery services, services for everyone and treatment of disease, disorder or injury. The last inspection date here was 13th September 2017

Norheads Lane Surgery is managed by DR Nandita Sabharwal.

Contact Details:

    Address:
      Norheads Lane Surgery
      14A Norheads Lane
      Biggin Hill
      Westerham
      TN16 3XS
      United Kingdom
    Telephone:
      01959574488

Ratings:

For a guide to the ratings, click here.

Safe: Good
Effective: Good
Caring: Good
Responsive: Good
Well-Led: Good
Overall: Good

Further Details:

Important Dates:

    Last Inspection 2017-09-13
    Last Published 2017-09-13

Local Authority:

    Bromley

Link to this page:

    HTML   BBCode

Inspection Reports:

Click the title bar on any of the report introductions below to read the full entry. If there is a PDF icon, click it to download the full report.

2nd August 2017 - During a routine inspection pdf icon

Letter from the Chief Inspector of General Practice

We carried out an announced comprehensive inspection at Norheads Lane Surgery on 2 August 2017. Overall the practice is rated as good.

Our key findings across all the areas we inspected were as follows:

  • There was an open and transparent approach to safety and a system in place for reporting and recording significant events.
  • The practice had clearly defined and embedded systems to minimise risks to patient safety.
  • Clinical staff were aware of current evidence based guidance and had been trained to provide them with the skills and knowledge to deliver effective care and treatment.
  • Results from the national GP patient survey showed patients were treated with compassion, dignity and respect and felt involved in their care and decisions about their treatment. The practice was rated above average for consultations with the nurse but comparable to or below the national average in some areas for consultations with a GP.

  • Information about services and how to complain was available. Improvements were made as a result of learning from complaints and concerns.
  • A patient participation group (PPG) had been in operation in the practice since 2011. However, there were now only six members of the group and as they no longer held meetings, communication was carried out by email only.

  • Most patients we spoke with said they were usually able to make an appointment with a GP when they wanted one and urgent appointments were usually available the same day through the practice walk-in service.
  • The practice had good facilities and was well equipped to treat patients and meet their needs.
  • There was a clear leadership structure and staff felt supported by management. The practice proactively sought feedback from staff and patients, which it acted on.
  • The provider was aware of the requirements of the duty of candour. Examples we reviewed showed the practice complied with these requirements.

The areas where the provider should make improvement are:

  • The provider should continue to monitor patient satisfaction rates regarding consultations with GPs and implement improvements as appropriate.
  • The provider should consider strategies to encourage patients to join the patient participation group (PPG) and establish regular communication with group members.

Professor Steve Field CBE FRCP FFPH FRCGP 

Chief Inspector of General Practice

 

 

Latest Additions: