Attention: The information on this website is currently out of date and should not be relied upon..

Care Services

carehome, nursing and medical services directory


Northville Family Practice, Northville, Bristol.

Northville Family Practice in Northville, Bristol is a Doctors/GP specialising in the provision of services relating to diagnostic and screening procedures, family planning services, maternity and midwifery services, services for everyone and treatment of disease, disorder or injury. The last inspection date here was 24th March 2017

Northville Family Practice is managed by Brisdoc Healthcare Services Limited who are also responsible for 6 other locations

Contact Details:

Ratings:

For a guide to the ratings, click here.

Safe: Good
Effective: Good
Caring: Good
Responsive: Good
Well-Led: Good
Overall: Good

Further Details:

Important Dates:

    Last Inspection 2017-03-24
    Last Published 2017-03-24

Local Authority:

    South Gloucestershire

Link to this page:

    HTML   BBCode

Inspection Reports:

Click the title bar on any of the report introductions below to read the full entry. If there is a PDF icon, click it to download the full report.

2nd February 2017 - During a routine inspection pdf icon

Letter from the Chief Inspector of General Practice

We carried out an announced comprehensive inspection at Northville Family Practice on 2 February 2017.

Overall the practice is rated as good.

Our key findings across all the areas we inspected were as follows:

  • Staff assessed patients’ needs and delivered care in line with current evidence based guidance. Staff had been trained to provide them with the skills, knowledge and experience to deliver effective care and treatment.

  • There was an open and transparent approach to safety and an effective system in place for reporting and recording significant events.

  • Patients said they were treated with compassion, dignity and respect and they were involved in their care and decisions about their treatment.

  • Risks to patients were assessed and well managed; further attention was needed to ensure all vulnerable patients records were coded correctly. However, we found the practice was proactive with identifying risks to patients and had reviewed the notes of all female patients aged over 65 who had not had contact with the surgery in the last year and planned to do the same for the comparable males. The register was reviewed quarterly at multidisciplinary practice meetings and patients who had no contact with the practice in the previous quarter were telephoned and services offered.

  • Information about services and how to complain was available and easy to understand. Improvements were made to the quality of care as a result of complaints and concerns.

  • Patients said they could make an appointment with a named GP; there was continuity of care, with urgent appointments available the same day.

  • The practice had good facilities and was well equipped to treat patients and meet their needs.

  • There was a clear leadership structure and staff felt supported by management. The practice proactively sought feedback from staff and patients, which it acted on.

  • The provider was aware of and complied with the requirements of the duty of candour.

The areas where the provider should make improvement are:

  • The practice should further develop processes and systems and embed them with the staff team, for example, medicine monitoring processes, a protocol for hospital discharge medicine changes and timely viewing of results.

  • The practice should ensure that the information accessible by the public on the website is kept up to date.

  • The practice should address the coding issues to ensure all vulnerable patients are identified.

  • The practice should obtain an electrical installation certificate for the premises.

Professor Steve Field (CBE FRCP FFPH FRCGP) 

Chief Inspector of General Practice

 

 

Latest Additions: