Attention: The information on this website is currently out of date and should not be relied upon..

Care Services

carehome, nursing and medical services directory


Park Private Clinic, Nottingham.

Park Private Clinic in Nottingham is a Doctors/GP specialising in the provision of services relating to diagnostic and screening procedures, services for everyone and treatment of disease, disorder or injury. The last inspection date here was 8th August 2019

Park Private Clinic is managed by F&A Health Ltd.

Contact Details:

Ratings:

For a guide to the ratings, click here.

Safe: No Rating / Under Appeal / Rating Suspended
Effective: No Rating / Under Appeal / Rating Suspended
Caring: No Rating / Under Appeal / Rating Suspended
Responsive: No Rating / Under Appeal / Rating Suspended
Well-Led: No Rating / Under Appeal / Rating Suspended
Overall: No Rating / Under Appeal / Rating Suspended

Further Details:

Important Dates:

    Last Inspection 2019-08-08
    Last Published 2018-06-27

Local Authority:

    Nottingham

Link to this page:

    HTML   BBCode

Inspection Reports:

Click the title bar on any of the report introductions below to read the full entry. If there is a PDF icon, click it to download the full report.

23rd March 2018 - During a routine inspection pdf icon

We carried out an announced comprehensive inspection on 23 March 2018 to ask the service the following key questions; Are services safe, effective, caring, responsive and well-led.

Our findings were:

Are services safe?

We found that this service was providing safe care in accordance with the relevant regulations

Are services effective?

We found that this service was providing effective care in accordance with the relevant regulations

Are services caring?

We found that this service was providing caring services in accordance with the relevant regulations.

Are services responsive?

We found that this service was providing responsive care in accordance with the relevant regulations.

Are services well-led?

We found that this service was providing well-led care in accordance with the relevant regulations.

We carried out this inspection under Section 60 of the Health and Social Care Act 2008 as part of our regulatory functions. This inspection was planned to check whether the practice was meeting the legal requirements and regulations associated with the Health and Social Care Act 2008.

Park Private Clinic offers patients a range of private GP medical services including; travel vaccinations (in addition to being a registered NathNaC yellow fever centre), private GP consultations, sexual health tests, employment medicals as well as corporate and individual health screenings from a purposefully converted building in Nottingham City Centre. These are available on both a walk-in and pre-bookable appointment basis.

This service is registered with CQC under the Health and Social Care Act 2008 in respect of some, but not all, of the services it provides. There are some exemptions from regulation by CQC, which relate to particular types of service and these are set out in Schedule 2 of The Health and Social Care Act 2008 (Regulated Activities) Regulations 2014.

At Park Private Clinic, the aesthetic cosmetic treatments that are also provided are exempt by law from CQC regulation. The provider, which is F&A Health Ltd, is registered with the Care Quality Commission to provide services at 16 Regent Street, The Park, Nottingham, NG1 5BQ. The period property has been used to provide services to patients since 2013.

The GP is the registered manager. A registered manager is a person who is registered with the Care Quality Commission to manage the service. Like registered providers, they are ‘registered persons’. Registered persons have legal responsibility for meeting the requirements in the Health and Social Care Act 2008 and associated Regulations about how the service is run.

We received 53 comment cards in the lead up to the inspection, the patients responses were entirely positive about their experiences at the practice. Feedback on their care and treatment described the care received as being extremely caring and professional, very respectful and the GP as very informative. A large proportion of patients commented on the relaxed atmosphere and never feeling rushed during appointments.

Our key findings were:

  • The service took a proactive approach to updating systems and facilities as a result of incidents to reduce the likelihood they would happen again.
  • The way in which care was delivered was reviewed to ensure it was delivered according to evidence- based guidelines.
  • We saw patients were treated with compassion and kindness and patient feedback supported this.
  • Services were provided to meet the needs of patients.
  • Patient feedback for the services offered was consistently positive.
  • Staff told us there was an open and inclusive culture of management and felt their views were listened to.
  • There were clear responsibilities, roles and systems of accountability to support good governance and management.

There were areas where the provider could make improvements and should:

Review the registration process to ensure that adults accompanying children for appointments had parental authority for the child before treatment was provided.

Professor Steve Field CBE FRCP FFPH FRCGP

Chief Inspector of General Practice

6th February 2014 - During a routine inspection pdf icon

We spoke with six people who used the service as part of our inspection. They all expressed that they had been satisfied with the care and treatment they had received at the clinic. One person said: "I used the service and it was great. I have nothing to complain about." Another person commented: "I found the whole experience very caring. The doctor rang about three times after I saw him." Nobody had any concerns about the quality of care being delivered at the service.

We spoke with two members of staff working at the clinic and we spoke with the provider. Staff were happy working for the service and described to us how patients were able to feedback to them on an on-going basis. The told us that they were supported and that they felt adequately trained to carry out their roles.

We found that consent was being obtained from people for all treatments offered at the service. We found that people's care was being risk assessed and planned and delivered to meet their individual needs. However, we found there was not adequate emergency equipment on site to ensure people's safety.

The service was clean and hygienic and there were systems in place to ensure that people were protected from the risk of infection.

There were systems in place to allow people using the service to express their views about how the service was being run. Management checks were in place to ensure the safe delivery of appropriate care to people.

 

 

Latest Additions: