Attention: The information on this website is currently out of date and should not be relied upon..

Care Services

carehome, nursing and medical services directory


Pendle Community Hospital, Nelson.

Pendle Community Hospital in Nelson is a Community services - Healthcare, Diagnosis/screening, Hospital, Long-term condition and Rehabilitation (illness/injury) specialising in the provision of services relating to diagnostic and screening procedures, nursing care, services for everyone and treatment of disease, disorder or injury. The last inspection date here was 8th January 2013

Pendle Community Hospital is managed by East Lancashire Hospitals NHS Trust who are also responsible for 7 other locations

Contact Details:

    Address:
      Pendle Community Hospital
      Leeds Road
      Nelson
      BB9 9SZ
      United Kingdom
    Telephone:
      01254263555
    Website:

Ratings:

For a guide to the ratings, click here.

Safe: No Rating / Under Appeal / Rating Suspended
Effective: No Rating / Under Appeal / Rating Suspended
Caring: No Rating / Under Appeal / Rating Suspended
Responsive: No Rating / Under Appeal / Rating Suspended
Well-Led: No Rating / Under Appeal / Rating Suspended
Overall: No Rating / Under Appeal / Rating Suspended

Further Details:

Important Dates:

    Last Inspection 2013-01-08
    Last Published 0000-00-00

Local Authority:

    Lancashire

Link to this page:

    HTML   BBCode

Inspection Reports:

Click the title bar on any of the report introductions below to read the full entry. If there is a PDF icon, click it to download the full report.

28th December 2012 - During an inspection to make sure that the improvements required had been made pdf icon

We carried out this inspection to follow up areas of non compliance found during our inspection on 22 August 2012.

On this inspection we found patients were very positive and complimentary about the service provided, one patient told us, “I can’t speak highly enough of the care, it’s been fantastic” and another patient said, “All the staff without exception have been very kind and caring”. Patients told us their rights to privacy, dignity and independence were upheld and respected and they had a good relationship with the staff.

Patients were involved in the development and review of their care plans and had signed their plans to indicate their participation and agreement. All patients spoken with were familiar with their plan of care.

Patients had ready access to a number of records including their plan, which was stored at the end of each bed. Other medical records and ongoing progress notes were kept in trolleys on the wards. We found the sample of records looked at were well organised and up to date.

22nd August 2012 - During a themed inspection looking at Dignity and Nutrition pdf icon

People told us what it was like to be a patient in Pendle Community Hospital. They described how they were treated by staff and their involvement in making choices about their care. They also told us about the quality and choice of food and drink available. This was because this inspection was part of a themed inspection programme to assess whether older people in hospitals were treated with dignity and respect and whether their nutritional needs were met.

The inspection team was led by a Care Quality Commission (CQC) inspector joined by a practising professional and an Expert by Experience, who has personal experience of using, or caring for someone who uses this type of service.

Patients using the service told us they were satisfied with the care and treatment they received at Pendle Community Hospital. One patient told us, “I can’t fault anything and I have no concerns or worries” another patient said “They’re okay and they’re looking after me”.

We found patients experienced some good care and treatment. However we observed some practices which did not effectively promote patients’ dignity, consultation and involvement.

Patients told us they liked the variety and quantity of the meals provided at Pendle Community Hospital. We found the catering arrangements offered a variety of meals and choices. Patient’s individual food preferences were catered for as far as possible. Eating and drinking sufficient amounts was encouraged and promoted. Consideration was being given to individual nutritional needs and specific dietary requirements.

Patients told us they felt safe and comfortable in the hospital. Although some patients spoken with were uncertain what they would do if they were worried or concerned about anything, we found there were notices displayed throughout the wards on how to make a complaint.

We found there were sufficient staff on the wards to respond to the patients’ needs. Patients told us the staff treated them well.

We found some of the written records on the wards did not always support and promote good care practices.

 

 

Latest Additions: