Attention: The information on this website is currently out of date and should not be relied upon..

Care Services

carehome, nursing and medical services directory


Quay Lane Surgery, St Germans, Saltash.

Quay Lane Surgery in St Germans, Saltash is a Doctors/GP specialising in the provision of services relating to diagnostic and screening procedures, family planning services, maternity and midwifery services, services for everyone, surgical procedures and treatment of disease, disorder or injury. The last inspection date here was 22nd May 2017

Quay Lane Surgery is managed by Quay Lane Surgery.

Contact Details:

Ratings:

For a guide to the ratings, click here.

Safe: Good
Effective: Good
Caring: Good
Responsive: Good
Well-Led: Good
Overall: Good

Further Details:

Important Dates:

    Last Inspection 2017-05-22
    Last Published 2017-05-22

Local Authority:

    Cornwall

Link to this page:

    HTML   BBCode

Inspection Reports:

Click the title bar on any of the report introductions below to read the full entry. If there is a PDF icon, click it to download the full report.

19th April 2017 - During a routine inspection pdf icon

Letter from the Chief Inspector of General Practice

We carried out an announced comprehensive inspection at Quay Lane Surgery on 19 April 2017. Overall the practice is rated as good.

Our key findings across all the areas we inspected were as follows:

  • There was an open and transparent approach to safety and a system in place for reporting and recording significant events.

  • The practice had clearly defined and embedded systems to minimise risks to patient safety.

  • Staff were aware of current evidence based guidance. Staff had been trained to provide them with the skills and knowledge to deliver effective care and treatment.

  • Results from the national GP patient survey showed patients were treated with compassion, dignity and respect and were involved in their care and decisions about their treatment.

  • Quay Lane Surgery is a dispensing practice. Systems were in place for the storage and safe dispensing of medicines. Staff had received appropriate training for their role.

  • Information about services and how to complain was available. Improvements were made to the quality of care as a result of complaints and concerns.

  • Patients we spoke with said they found it easy to make an appointment with a named GP and there was continuity of care, with urgent appointments available the same day.

  • The practice had good facilities and was well equipped to treat patients and meet their needs.

  • There was a clear leadership structure and staff felt supported by management. The practice proactively sought feedback from staff and patients, which it acted on.

  • The practice had won a “Pride in Practice” award for the recognition and sensitive treatment of people who were of Lesbian, Gay and Bi-sexual orientation.

  • The provider was aware of the requirements of the duty of candour. Examples we reviewed showed the practice complied with these requirements.

  • We found the service had made improvements since our previous inspection on 21 January 2015. For example, the practice had

    improve patient record keeping to confirm that consent had

    been obtained for invasive procedures such as ear

    syringing and cervical screening. The practice

    had p

    rovided Mental Capacity Act (MCA) training for staff. The practice had also implemented regular documented meetings so that all clinical staff were able

    to discuss clinical issues and significant events to ensure

    risks were minimised and improvements were made. The practice had improved the histology results

    monitoring records to ensure blood tests and other results were followed up

    promptly.

We saw one area of outstanding practice:

The practice worked with the community for the home delivery of medicines from the practice dispensary.

 97% of patients meeting the criteria for accessing dispensing services obtained their medicines from the dispensary. The challenges of providing a service patients living in a large rural location covering 45 square miles with poor public transport and numerous housebound patients had been met by the practice. A voluntary member of staff worked four days a month to deliver medicines to housebound patients. The practice contacted patients to confirm one week prior to delivery. Patients told us they would otherwise find it very difficult to obtain their prescriptions.

Professor Steve Field (CBE FRCP FFPH FRCGP) 

Chief Inspector of General Practice

21st January 2015 - During a routine inspection pdf icon

Letter from the Chief Inspector of General Practice

We carried out an announced comprehensive inspection at Quay Lane Surgery on 19 April 2017. Overall the practice is rated as good.

Our key findings across all the areas we inspected were as follows:

  • There was an open and transparent approach to safety and a system in place for reporting and recording significant events.

  • The practice had clearly defined and embedded systems to minimise risks to patient safety.

  • Staff were aware of current evidence based guidance. Staff had been trained to provide them with the skills and knowledge to deliver effective care and treatment.

  • Results from the national GP patient survey showed patients were treated with compassion, dignity and respect and were involved in their care and decisions about their treatment.

  • Quay Lane Surgery is a dispensing practice. Systems were in place for the storage and safe dispensing of medicines. Staff had received appropriate training for their role.

  • Information about services and how to complain was available. Improvements were made to the quality of care as a result of complaints and concerns.

  • Patients we spoke with said they found it easy to make an appointment with a named GP and there was continuity of care, with urgent appointments available the same day.

  • The practice had good facilities and was well equipped to treat patients and meet their needs.

  • There was a clear leadership structure and staff felt supported by management. The practice proactively sought feedback from staff and patients, which it acted on.

  • The practice had won a “Pride in Practice” award for the recognition and sensitive treatment of people who were of Lesbian, Gay and Bi-sexual orientation.

  • The provider was aware of the requirements of the duty of candour. Examples we reviewed showed the practice complied with these requirements.

  • We found the service had made improvements since our previous inspection on 21 January 2015. For example, the practice had

    improve patient record keeping to confirm that consent had

    been obtained for invasive procedures such as ear

    syringing and cervical screening. The practice

    had p

    rovided Mental Capacity Act (MCA) training for staff. The practice had also implemented regular documented meetings so that all clinical staff were able

    to discuss clinical issues and significant events to ensure

    risks were minimised and improvements were made. The practice had improved the histology results

    monitoring records to ensure blood tests and other results were followed up

    promptly.

We saw one area of outstanding practice:

The practice worked with the community for the home delivery of medicines from the practice dispensary.

 97% of patients meeting the criteria for accessing dispensing services obtained their medicines from the dispensary. The challenges of providing a service patients living in a large rural location covering 45 square miles with poor public transport and numerous housebound patients had been met by the practice. A voluntary member of staff worked four days a month to deliver medicines to housebound patients. The practice contacted patients to confirm one week prior to delivery. Patients told us they would otherwise find it very difficult to obtain their prescriptions.

Professor Steve Field (CBE FRCP FFPH FRCGP) 

Chief Inspector of General Practice

 

 

Latest Additions: