Attention: The information on this website is currently out of date and should not be relied upon..

Care Services

carehome, nursing and medical services directory


Radcliffe House, Radcliffe, Manchester.

Radcliffe House in Radcliffe, Manchester is a Nursing home specialising in the provision of services relating to accommodation for persons who require nursing or personal care, caring for adults under 65 yrs, learning disabilities, mental health conditions and treatment of disease, disorder or injury. The last inspection date here was 15th February 2019

Radcliffe House is managed by Nestlings Care Ltd who are also responsible for 4 other locations

Contact Details:

    Address:
      Radcliffe House
      26 Eastfields
      Radcliffe
      Manchester
      M26 4QE
      United Kingdom
    Telephone:
      01617247738

Ratings:

For a guide to the ratings, click here.

Safe: Good
Effective: Good
Caring: Good
Responsive: Good
Well-Led: Good
Overall: Good

Further Details:

Important Dates:

    Last Inspection 2019-02-15
    Last Published 2019-02-15

Local Authority:

    Bury

Link to this page:

    HTML   BBCode

Inspection Reports:

Click the title bar on any of the report introductions below to read the full entry. If there is a PDF icon, click it to download the full report.

22nd January 2019 - During a routine inspection pdf icon

Radcliffe house is a three bedroomed semi-detached property in a residential area offering young people transition back into the community as part of their recovery pathway. Young people have varying support depending on their rehabilitation needs.

The service had a registered manager. A registered manager is a person who has registered with the CQC to manage the service. Like registered providers, they are 'registered persons'. Registered persons have legal responsibility for meeting the requirements in the Health and Social Care Act 2008 and associated Regulations about how the service is run.

The service was first registered in February 2018. This is the first rated inspection for this service.

The service used the local authority safeguarding procedures to report any safeguarding concerns. Staff had been trained in safeguarding topics and were aware of their responsibilities to report any possible abuse.

Recruitment procedures were robust and ensured new staff were safe to work with vulnerable adults. There were sufficient staff to meet people’s needs.

The administration of medicines was safe. Staff had been trained in the administration of medicines and had up to date policies and procedures to follow.

The home was clean, tidy and homely in character. Staff were trained in the prevention and control of infection to help protect the health and welfare of people who used the service.

Electrical and gas appliances were serviced regularly. Each person had a personal emergency evacuation plan (PEEP) and there was a business contingency plan for any unforeseen emergencies.

People were given choices in the food they ate and supported to shop and cook for themselves. People were encouraged to eat and drink to ensure they were hydrated and well fed.

Staff had been trained in the Mental Capacity Act 2005 (MCA) and the Deprivation of Liberty Safeguards (DoLS).

New staff received induction training to provide them with the skills to care for people. Staff files and training records showed staff had undertaken sufficient training to meet the needs of people and they were supervised regularly to check their competence. Supervision sessions also gave staff the opportunity to discuss their work and ask for any training they felt necessary.

We observed there were good interactions between staff and people who used the service.

We saw from our observations of staff and records that people who used the service were given choices in many aspects of their lives and helped to remain independent where possible.

We saw that the quality of care plans gave staff sufficient information to look after people accommodated at the care home. Plans of care were individual, person centred and reviewed regularly to help meet their health and social care needs.

We saw that people could take part in activities of their choice and families and friends were able to visit when they wanted.

Audits and meetings helped maintain and improve standards of service provision.

People thought the registered manager was approachable and supportive. There were systems to audit the quality of service provision.

There were staff with recognised professional qualifications to provide care and support for people who used the service and advice for staff to follow good practice.

 

 

Latest Additions: