Attention: The information on this website is currently out of date and should not be relied upon..

Care Services

carehome, nursing and medical services directory


SC Galaxy Care, Bellingham, London.

SC Galaxy Care in Bellingham, London is a Homecare agencies specialising in the provision of services relating to caring for adults over 65 yrs, caring for adults under 65 yrs, caring for children (0 - 18yrs), dementia, learning disabilities, mental health conditions, personal care and physical disabilities. The last inspection date here was 31st October 2018

SC Galaxy Care is managed by SC Galaxy Care Ltd.

Contact Details:

    Address:
      SC Galaxy Care
      22a Randlesdown Road
      Bellingham
      London
      SE6 3BT
      United Kingdom
    Telephone:
      02084883767

Ratings:

For a guide to the ratings, click here.

Safe: Good
Effective: Good
Caring: Good
Responsive: Good
Well-Led: Good
Overall: Good

Further Details:

Important Dates:

    Last Inspection 2018-10-31
    Last Published 2018-10-31

Local Authority:

    Lewisham

Link to this page:

    HTML   BBCode

Inspection Reports:

Click the title bar on any of the report introductions below to read the full entry. If there is a PDF icon, click it to download the full report.

4th September 2018 - During a routine inspection pdf icon

This inspection took place on 4 September 2018 and was announced. SC Galaxy Care is a domiciliary care service. It provides personal care to people living in their own homes. Not everyone using SC Galaxy Care receives a regulated activity. The Care Quality Commission (CQC) only inspects the service being received by people provided with 'personal care' and help with tasks related to personal hygiene and eating.

At the last inspection on 6 June 2017, we found that the service did not meet fundamental standards in some aspects of the service. We found one breach of regulation relating to how staff supported people. The registered manager and staff did not understand how to support people to ensure that the requirements of the Mental Capacity Act 2005 (MCA) and Deprivation of Liberty Safeguards (DoLS) were met. We requested the registered manager send us an action plan to tell us how they planned to make improvements to the service. We received this information as requested.

At this inspection we followed up on the breach of regulation to see if the registered provider had made improvements as required. We found the registered manager had taken action to address our concerns and now met the fundamental standards.

The service had a registered manager in post. A registered manager is a person who has registered with the Care Quality Commission to manage the service. Like registered providers, they are ‘registered persons’. Registered persons have legal responsibility for meeting the requirements in the Health and Social Care Act 2008 and associated Regulations about how the service is run.

The registered manager and staff understood the principles of the Mental Capacity Act 2005 (MCA). Staff completed training in the MCA which helped them identify when people lacked the mental capacity to make decisions for themselves. People are supported to have maximum choice and control of their lives and staff support them in the least restrictive way possible; the policies and systems in the service support this practice. Staff gave people enough information and choices to enable them to make an informed decision and give staff their consent.

The registered provider had a safeguarding policy in place. Staff understood abuse and how to act to manage a safeguarding allegation and protected people from harm. The registered manager was kept updated on any safeguarding incidents in the service.

Staff identified risks to people’s health and wellbeing. Staff recorded these details in risk assessments and developed a plan to manage those risks for people.

There were sufficient members of staff to meet people’s care and support needs. The registered manager completed pre-employment checks while following a robust recruitment process.

Medicines were managed safely. Staff supported people with the administration of medicines. There were effective processes in place for the management of people’s medicines.

Staff were supported by the registered manager through a programme of induction, training supervision and appraisal.

Staff supported people to prepare meals of their choice. People had meals they enjoyed which met their preferences and dietary needs. People had access to healthcare services. This helped them to maintain and improve their health and wellbeing.

Assessments were completed with people using the service. Each person had an assessment of their needs and a care plan that guided staff to care for people safely. People could make decisions about how they wanted their care and support carried out.

The registered manager and staff were aware of end of life care. At the time of the inspection, there were no people receiving palliative support or end of life care.

People and their relatives said staff treated them with respect, kindness and were helpful. Staff respected people’s privacy and provided care in a dignified way.

The registered provider had an infection control policy. This guided staff on what actions to take to

6th June 2017 - During a routine inspection pdf icon

SC Galaxy Care is a domiciliary care service. The service provides personal care for people living in their own homes. At the time of the inspection, 22 people were using the service. This inspection took place on 6 June 2017 and was announced. This was SC Galaxy Care’s first inspection since their registration with the Care Quality Commission (CQC).

The service had a registered manager in post. A registered manager is a person who has registered with the Care Quality Commission to manage the service. Like registered providers, they are ‘registered persons’. Registered persons have legal responsibility for meeting the requirements in the Health and Social Care Act 2008 and associated Regulations about how the service is run.

The registered manager and staff did not have an understanding of how to support people in line with the Mental Capacity Act 2005 (MCA) and Deprivation of Liberty Safeguards (DoLS).

People were not supported to have maximum choice and control of their lives and staff did not support them in the least restrictive way possible; the policies and systems in the service did not support this practice.

People received their medicines as prescribed. Staff completed training in the safe administration of people’s medicines. However, we found that medicine administration records (MARs) did not always have recorded when a medicine was not given. Since the inspection, the registered manager has sent us evidence demonstrating that they have reviewed the process for medicine audit systems.

Staff were supported by the registered manager. Staff had access to an induction, training, supervision and an appraisal. Newly employed staff underwent an induction and worked with experienced staff. However, we found that staff did not have a training programme in place and staff did not have the opportunity to complete refresher training to enable them to keep up to date with best practice. There was enough staff available to meet people’s care needs. The staff rota showed when two members of staff were required to safely care for people, because of their specific care needs.

The registered provider’s safeguarding policies and processes guided staff to help protect people from abuse. Staff knew the types of abuse, and when to raise a safeguarding alert. People provided consent to staff to receive care and support with their care needs.

Staff identified and managed risks to people‘s health and well-being. Staff developed risk management plans that contained details of the risks and action staff would take to manage them.

The registered manager followed safe recruitment processes. New members of staff had pre-employment checks completed, such as criminal record checks and references from previous employers. This helped to ensure the employment of suitable staff to work with people safely by verifying their identity, skills and abilities.

People’s nutritional needs were met by staff. This helped people to maintain their health and wellbeing. People had meals they wanted and in sufficient quantities. Staff supported people with shopping for food items if they wanted to make meals for themselves.

Health care services were available to people to meet their needs. Staff followed health care professional guidance to help people maintain their health. Consent to care was provided by people before receiving care.

People using the service and their relatives made decisions about the care they received. Assessments included people’s care and support needs. Care was planned and delivered in a way that was person centred and incorporated people’s likes dislikes and personal preferences.

Staff provided care and support to people in a way that showed they respected their dignity and privacy. Staff knew people well including their needs.

People were supported to attend activities of their choice. People were supported to live a life that met their abilities and helped them to maintain some independence. People continued to have co

 

 

Latest Additions: