Attention: The information on this website is currently out of date and should not be relied upon..

Care Services

carehome, nursing and medical services directory


St. Peter's Community Hospital Ward, Admin Block, 32a Spital Road, Maldon.

St. Peter's Community Hospital Ward in Admin Block, 32a Spital Road, Maldon is a Rehabilitation (illness/injury) specialising in the provision of services relating to caring for adults over 65 yrs, diagnostic and screening procedures and treatment of disease, disorder or injury. The last inspection date here was 17th April 2014

St. Peter's Community Hospital Ward is managed by Provide Community Interest Company who are also responsible for 5 other locations

Contact Details:

    Address:
      St. Peter's Community Hospital Ward
      St. Peter's Hospital
      Admin Block
      32a Spital Road
      Maldon
      CM9 6EG
      United Kingdom
    Telephone:
      01621727325

Ratings:

For a guide to the ratings, click here.

Safe: No Rating / Under Appeal / Rating Suspended
Effective: No Rating / Under Appeal / Rating Suspended
Caring: No Rating / Under Appeal / Rating Suspended
Responsive: No Rating / Under Appeal / Rating Suspended
Well-Led: No Rating / Under Appeal / Rating Suspended
Overall: No Rating / Under Appeal / Rating Suspended

Further Details:

Important Dates:

    Last Inspection 2014-04-17
    Last Published 2014-04-17

Local Authority:

    Essex

Link to this page:

    HTML   BBCode

Inspection Reports:

Click the title bar on any of the report introductions below to read the full entry. If there is a PDF icon, click it to download the full report.

30th January 2013 - During a routine inspection pdf icon

People were happy with the care and services they received on St Peter's Community Ward. People told us that they felt listened to and that staff maintained their privacy and dignity. Comments included “The staff are busy, but they are considerate and listen to what you want, they ask you if you are alright and if you need anything.” Another person said “On the whole I am satisfied, the staff are very nice.” We found that the multi-disciplinary team approach ensured that people received the care and support that they needed and that their discharge from hospital was fully planned.

We found that overall the staff were well trained but over the last year staff supervision has become less consistent. The provider had good systems in place to assess and monitor the quality of care and they sought feedback from people using the service.

1st January 1970 - During a routine inspection pdf icon

St Peter’s Community Hospital ward has 26 beds split between stroke rehabilitation (10 bedded) and rehabilitation and end of life care for adults (14 bedded). It also offers day case admission for patients.

We chose to inspect St Peter’s Community Hospital Ward as part of the first pilot phase of the new inspection process we are introducing for community health services. St Peter’s Community Hospital Ward was last inspected in February 2013 when we found it to be compliant in the five standards we reviewed.

In general, we found that St Peter’s Community Hospital ward provided safe care. People were protected from abuse and avoidable harm. Systems for identifying, investigating and learning from patient safety incidents were in place.

Inpatient services were effective and focussed on the needs of patients. We saw examples of effective collaborative working practices and sufficient staff available to meet the needs of people accommodated within this facility.

The majority of people said that they had positive experiences of care. We saw good examples of care being provided with compassion and of effective interactions between staff and patients. We found staff to be hard working, caring and committed. We noted many staff spoke with passion about their work and were proud of what they did.

St Peter’s Community Hospital ward responded to people’s needs. We found the organisation actively sought the views of patients and families. People from all communities could access services and effective multidisciplinary team working, including inpatient and community teams, ensured people were provided with care that met their needs, at the right time and without delay.

The ward was well-led. Organisational, governance and risk management structures were in place. The senior management team were visible and the culture was seen as open and transparent. Staff were aware of the vision and way forward for the organisation and said that they generally felt well supported and that they could raise any concerns. Many staff told us that it was a good place to work.

Although mechanisms were in place for staff to receive individual clinical supervision, there were inconsistencies in practice. Monitoring systems were not in place that would ensure staff received the four individual supervision sessions per year as per policy, or that ensured sufficient time for reflection between sessions.

 

 

Latest Additions: