Attention: The information on this website is currently out of date and should not be relied upon..

Care Services

carehome, nursing and medical services directory


The Event Medicine Company, Central Estate, Albert Road, Aldershot.

The Event Medicine Company in Central Estate, Albert Road, Aldershot is a Ambulance specialising in the provision of services relating to services for everyone, transport services, triage and medical advice provided remotely and treatment of disease, disorder or injury. The last inspection date here was 30th August 2019

The Event Medicine Company is managed by The Event Medicine Company Ltd.

Contact Details:

Ratings:

For a guide to the ratings, click here.

Safe: No Rating / Under Appeal / Rating Suspended
Effective: No Rating / Under Appeal / Rating Suspended
Caring: No Rating / Under Appeal / Rating Suspended
Responsive: No Rating / Under Appeal / Rating Suspended
Well-Led: No Rating / Under Appeal / Rating Suspended
Overall: No Rating / Under Appeal / Rating Suspended

Further Details:

Important Dates:

    Last Inspection 2019-08-30
    Last Published 2018-05-04

Local Authority:

    Hampshire

Link to this page:

    HTML   BBCode

Inspection Reports:

Click the title bar on any of the report introductions below to read the full entry. If there is a PDF icon, click it to download the full report.

5th December 2017 - During a routine inspection pdf icon

The Event Medicine Company is operated by The Event Medicine Company Ltd. The Event Medicine Company provides medical and paramedical services to events of all types and sizes, which includes emergency and urgent care, including conveyance of patients to acute hospital settings. The CQC does not have powers to regulate medical and paramedical care and treatment provided at events. This report details our findings about the care and treatment provided to patients when conveyed from event sites to acute hospital settings.

We inspected this service using our comprehensive inspection methodology. We carried out the inspection on 5 December 2017.

To get to the heart of patients’ experiences of care and treatment, we ask the same five questions of all services: are they safe, effective, caring, responsive to people's needs, and well-led?

Services we do not rate

We regulate independent ambulance services but we do not currently have a legal duty to rate them. We highlight good practice and issues that service providers need to improve and take regulatory action as necessary.

We found the following areas of good practice:

  • Staff had a good understanding of and followed safety processes such as safeguarding procedures, infection and prevention practices and incident reporting processes.

  • The condition of vehicles and equipment were monitored, serviced and maintained to ensure safety. There was sufficient equipment at all times to deliver the service.
  • There were sufficient staff with the relevant skills to deliver the service.
  • The ordering, receipt, storage, administration and disposal of medicines was managed safely. Staff took responsibility to ensure their professional skills were up to date in order to provide a safe and effective service.
  • The service had policies and procedures in line with national guidelines, which they reviewed as a minimum every three years.
  • The service engaged and coordinated their work with other organisations, including event organisers, local health care providers and local authorities to ensure delivery of a safe and effective service that met their contractual agreements. This included meeting the urgent health care needs of people attending events and where appropriate conveying them to acute health care facilities.
  • Leadership of the service promoted a positive culture that supported and valued staff.
  • The service had systems to identify risks and plan to eliminate or reduce those risks. They reviewed events collaboratively with event organisers in order to monitor the quality of the services provided and identify areas of improvements.

However, we also found the following issues that the service provider needs to improve:

  • Assurance processes were not fully established. There was lack of assurance that; staff were up to date with their mandatory and essential training from their main place of work; that staff had completed appropriate safeguarding training for adults and children and young people; that staff provided care and treatment to children and young people that met national guidance; that all staff followed infection prevention and control processes and used personal protective equipment appropriately.
  • Appraisal processes were not fully developed and implemented.
  • The new electronic system for recording staff recruitment, training and allocation of work duties did not fully assure the Event Medical Company Ltd (EMC) that all staff allocated to carry out work duties had the relevant skills and experience.

Following this inspection, we told the provider that it must take some actions to comply with the regulations and that it should make other improvements, even though a regulation had not been breached, to help the service improve. We also issued the provider with one requirement notice.  Details are at the end of the report.

Professor Ted Baker

Chief Inspector of Hospitals

 

 

Latest Additions: