Attention: The information on this website is currently out of date and should not be relied upon..

Care Services

carehome, nursing and medical services directory


The Lonsdale Medical Centre, London.

The Lonsdale Medical Centre in London is a Doctors/GP specialising in the provision of services relating to diagnostic and screening procedures, family planning services, maternity and midwifery services, services for everyone, surgical procedures and treatment of disease, disorder or injury. The last inspection date here was 18th September 2017

The Lonsdale Medical Centre is managed by The Lonsdale Medical Centre.

Contact Details:

Ratings:

For a guide to the ratings, click here.

Safe: Good
Effective: Good
Caring: Good
Responsive: Good
Well-Led: Good
Overall: Good

Further Details:

Important Dates:

    Last Inspection 2017-09-18
    Last Published 2017-09-18

Local Authority:

    Brent

Link to this page:

    HTML   BBCode

Inspection Reports:

Click the title bar on any of the report introductions below to read the full entry. If there is a PDF icon, click it to download the full report.

26th July 2017 - During an inspection to make sure that the improvements required had been made pdf icon

Letter from the Chief Inspector of General Practice

We carried out an announced comprehensive inspection at The Lonsdale Medical Centre on 23 February 2016. The practice was rated as requires improvement for providing safe, services, good for providing effective, caring, responsive and well-led services and an overall rating of good. The full comprehensive report of the 23 February 2016 inspection can be found by selecting the ‘all reports’ link for on our website at www.cqc.org.uk.

This inspection was carried out to check that action had been taken to comply with legal requirements, ensure improvements had been made and to review the practice's ratings. Overall the practice is now rated as good.

Our key findings across all the areas we inspected were as follows:

  • The practice team included a GP with an advanced qualification in mental health and this GP had helped to develop a range of protocols which improved the care and treatment given to patients with mental health conditions.
  • There was an open and transparent approach to safety and a system in place for reporting and recording significant events.
  • The practice had clearly defined and embedded systems to minimise risks to patient safety.
  • Staff were aware of current evidence based guidance. Staff had been trained to provide them with the skills and knowledge to deliver effective care and treatment.
  • Results from the national GP patient survey showed patients were treated with compassion, dignity and respect and were involved in their care and decisions about their treatment.
  • Information about services and how to complain was available. Improvements were made to the quality of care as a result of complaints and concerns.
  • Patients we spoke with said they found it easy to make an appointment with a named GP and there was continuity of care, with urgent appointments available the same day.
  • The practice had good facilities and was well equipped to treat patients and meet their needs.
  • There was a clear leadership structure and staff felt supported by management. The practice proactively sought feedback from staff and patients, which it acted on.
  • The provider was aware of the requirements of the duty of candour. Examples we reviewed showed the practice complied with these requirements.

The areas where the provider should make improvement are:

  • Continue to action areas for improvement identified in the infection prevention and control audit.
  • Continue to monitor uptake rates for public health screening programmes, particularly breast cancer screening, with a view to improving uptake rates.
  • Continue to review patient satisfaction levels around access to services and improve processes for making appointments.


Professor Steve Field CBE FRCP FFPH FRCGP

Chief Inspector of General Practice

23rd February 2016 - During a routine inspection pdf icon

Letter from the Chief Inspector of General Practice

We carried out an announced comprehensive inspection at The Lonsdale Medical Centre on 23 February 2016. The practice was rated as requires improvement for providing safe, services, good for providing effective, caring, responsive and well-led services and an overall rating of good. The full comprehensive report of the 23 February 2016 inspection can be found by selecting the ‘all reports’ link for on our website at www.cqc.org.uk.

This inspection was carried out to check that action had been taken to comply with legal requirements, ensure improvements had been made and to review the practice's ratings. Overall the practice is now rated as good.

Our key findings across all the areas we inspected were as follows:

  • The practice team included a GP with an advanced qualification in mental health and this GP had helped to develop a range of protocols which improved the care and treatment given to patients with mental health conditions.
  • There was an open and transparent approach to safety and a system in place for reporting and recording significant events.
  • The practice had clearly defined and embedded systems to minimise risks to patient safety.
  • Staff were aware of current evidence based guidance. Staff had been trained to provide them with the skills and knowledge to deliver effective care and treatment.
  • Results from the national GP patient survey showed patients were treated with compassion, dignity and respect and were involved in their care and decisions about their treatment.
  • Information about services and how to complain was available. Improvements were made to the quality of care as a result of complaints and concerns.
  • Patients we spoke with said they found it easy to make an appointment with a named GP and there was continuity of care, with urgent appointments available the same day.
  • The practice had good facilities and was well equipped to treat patients and meet their needs.
  • There was a clear leadership structure and staff felt supported by management. The practice proactively sought feedback from staff and patients, which it acted on.
  • The provider was aware of the requirements of the duty of candour. Examples we reviewed showed the practice complied with these requirements.

The areas where the provider should make improvement are:

  • Continue to action areas for improvement identified in the infection prevention and control audit.
  • Continue to monitor uptake rates for public health screening programmes, particularly breast cancer screening, with a view to improving uptake rates.
  • Continue to review patient satisfaction levels around access to services and improve processes for making appointments.


Professor Steve Field CBE FRCP FFPH FRCGP

Chief Inspector of General Practice

 

 

Latest Additions: