Attention: The information on this website is currently out of date and should not be relied upon..

Care Services

carehome, nursing and medical services directory


Trumpington Street Dental Practice, Cambridge.

Trumpington Street Dental Practice in Cambridge is a Dentist specialising in the provision of services relating to diagnostic and screening procedures, services for everyone, surgical procedures and treatment of disease, disorder or injury. The last inspection date here was 6th September 2013

Trumpington Street Dental Practice is managed by University of Cambridge Dental Practice Limited.

Contact Details:

    Address:
      Trumpington Street Dental Practice
      3 Trumpington Street
      Cambridge
      CB2 1QA
      United Kingdom
    Telephone:
      01223367870
    Website:

Ratings:

For a guide to the ratings, click here.

Safe: No Rating / Under Appeal / Rating Suspended
Effective: No Rating / Under Appeal / Rating Suspended
Caring: No Rating / Under Appeal / Rating Suspended
Responsive: No Rating / Under Appeal / Rating Suspended
Well-Led: No Rating / Under Appeal / Rating Suspended
Overall: No Rating / Under Appeal / Rating Suspended

Further Details:

Important Dates:

    Last Inspection 2013-09-06
    Last Published 2013-09-06

Local Authority:

    Cambridgeshire

Link to this page:

    HTML   BBCode

Inspection Reports:

Click the title bar on any of the report introductions below to read the full entry. If there is a PDF icon, click it to download the full report.

14th February 2013 - During a routine inspection pdf icon

During our inspection on the 14 February 2013 people we spoke with told us they were very pleased with their care and treatment and had confidence in the dentist. They told us they had been involved and included in their care and treatment planning and had made choices about which treatment options they preferred. One person said, "The dentist is great. I am completely happy with all the treatment I have received from them".

Care records showed that treatment had been recorded at each appointment that people had attended.

Safeguarding arrangements were weak. Not all staff had received training for safeguarding children and no staff had received training for safeguarding vulnerable adults. The safeguarding policy for children did not refer to which guidelines the provider was following and there was not a safeguarding policy for vulnerable adults.

We found that relevant Department of Health infection control guidelines had been adhered to which meant that people were safe from the risks of cross infection.

The premises were worn and tired looking and were in need of redecoration and some refurbishment.

The fire safety arrangements had been maintained and managed to a safe working order.

 

 

Latest Additions: