Attention: The information on this website is currently out of date and should not be relied upon..

Care Services

carehome, nursing and medical services directory


Waters View Residential Home, Little Oakley, Harwich.

Waters View Residential Home in Little Oakley, Harwich is a Residential home specialising in the provision of services relating to accommodation for persons who require nursing or personal care and caring for adults over 65 yrs. The last inspection date here was 22nd December 2016

Waters View Residential Home is managed by Mrs C Bradshaw.

Contact Details:

    Address:
      Waters View Residential Home
      85 Harwich Road
      Little Oakley
      Harwich
      CO12 5JA
      United Kingdom
    Telephone:
      01255880516

Ratings:

For a guide to the ratings, click here.

Safe: Good
Effective: Good
Caring: Good
Responsive: Good
Well-Led: Good
Overall: Good

Further Details:

Important Dates:

    Last Inspection 2016-12-22
    Last Published 2016-12-22

Local Authority:

    Essex

Link to this page:

    HTML   BBCode

Inspection Reports:

Click the title bar on any of the report introductions below to read the full entry. If there is a PDF icon, click it to download the full report.

4th October 2016 - During a routine inspection pdf icon

Waters View Residential Home provides accommodation and personal care for up to 15 people, some who were living with dementia.

Our previous inspection of 11 and 28 August 2015 found that the service required improvement. There were breaches in regulation that related to the service not being up to date with the Mental Capacity Act 2005 and the assessment of people’s capacity to consent to care and treatment was not being undertaken in line with the Mental Capacity Act 2005 and ineffective quality assurance systems to ensure that the service continuously improved. Improvements were needed in the recording of external medicines and the assessment of risk in relation to pressure care. People’s needs, wellbeing and social inclusion was not effectively assessed, planned and delivered to meet their needs and improvements were required to ensure people were involved in their care planning. After this inspection, the provider wrote to us to say what they would do to meet the legal requirements in relation to the need for consent and good governance.

There were 14 people living in the service when we inspected on 4 October 2016. This was an unannounced inspection. During this inspection we found that improvements had been made.

People received care that was personalised to them and met their individual needs and wishes. Staff respected people’s privacy and dignity and interacted with people in a caring, compassionate and professional manner. They were knowledgeable about people’s choices, views and preferences and acted on what they said. The atmosphere in the service was friendly and welcoming.

Systems were in place which safeguarded the people who used the service from the potential risk of abuse. Staff understood the various types of abuse and knew who to report any concerns to. Procedures and processes guided staff on how to ensure the safety of the people who used the service. Recruitment checks were carried out on prospective staff with sufficient numbers employed who had the knowledge and skills to meet people’s needs.

Appropriate arrangements were in place to ensure people’s medicines were obtained, stored and administered safely.

The service was up to date with the Mental Capacity Act (MCA) 20015 and Deprivation of Liberty Safeguards (DoLS). Staff sought consent from people before supporting them with their care and respected their choices.

People were supported to see, when needed, health and social care professionals to make sure they received appropriate care and treatment.

People’s nutritional needs were being assessed and they were supported to eat and drink sufficiently.

Processes were in place that encouraged feedback from people who used the service, relatives, and visiting professionals. There was a complaints procedure in place and people knew how to make a complaint if they were unhappy with the service.

There was a system in place to manage complaints and use them to improve the service. There was an open and empowering culture in the service. Quality assurance processes were used to identify shortfalls and address them. As a result the service continued to improve.

3rd October 2013 - During a routine inspection pdf icon

We inspected Waters View Residential Home on 09 October 2013.

During the inspection we received some positive comments from people living at the home. One person told us: "The staff are very nice, I’m more than satisfied with the care I’m given."

We checked that people had given their consent before receiving personal care or support. We saw that staff spoke kindly to people living at the home and there was a calm, happy, and relaxed atmosphere at the home.

A relative we spoke with told us: “The staff discussed XXXX’s care with me before coming to live at the home so they understand the correct approach to take.”

There were enough qualified, skilled and experienced staff to meet people’s needs.

The processes and systems used by the provider ensured records were accurate, appropriate and well maintained.

16th October 2012 - During a routine inspection pdf icon

We gathered evidence of people’s experiences of the service by talking with people, observing how they spent their time and noted how they interacted with other people living in the home and with staff.

During our visit we spoke with people who told us it was very nice at Waters View. We saw that people smiled and appeared relaxed and comfortable with staff and others living in the home.

During our inspection we saw that people received good care and that staff treated them with respect.

1st January 1970 - During a routine inspection pdf icon

Waters View Residential Home provides accommodation and personal care for up to 15 people, some who were living with dementia.

Our previous inspection of 11 and 28 August 2015 found that the service required improvement. There were breaches in regulation that related to the service not being up to date with the Mental Capacity Act 2005 and the assessment of people’s capacity to consent to care and treatment was not being undertaken in line with the Mental Capacity Act 2005 and ineffective quality assurance systems to ensure that the service continuously improved. Improvements were needed in the recording of external medicines and the assessment of risk in relation to pressure care. People’s needs, wellbeing and social inclusion was not effectively assessed, planned and delivered to meet their needs and improvements were required to ensure people were involved in their care planning. After this inspection, the provider wrote to us to say what they would do to meet the legal requirements in relation to the need for consent and good governance.

There were 14 people living in the service when we inspected on 4 October 2016. This was an unannounced inspection. During this inspection we found that improvements had been made.

People received care that was personalised to them and met their individual needs and wishes. Staff respected people’s privacy and dignity and interacted with people in a caring, compassionate and professional manner. They were knowledgeable about people’s choices, views and preferences and acted on what they said. The atmosphere in the service was friendly and welcoming.

Systems were in place which safeguarded the people who used the service from the potential risk of abuse. Staff understood the various types of abuse and knew who to report any concerns to. Procedures and processes guided staff on how to ensure the safety of the people who used the service. Recruitment checks were carried out on prospective staff with sufficient numbers employed who had the knowledge and skills to meet people’s needs.

Appropriate arrangements were in place to ensure people’s medicines were obtained, stored and administered safely.

The service was up to date with the Mental Capacity Act (MCA) 20015 and Deprivation of Liberty Safeguards (DoLS). Staff sought consent from people before supporting them with their care and respected their choices.

People were supported to see, when needed, health and social care professionals to make sure they received appropriate care and treatment.

People’s nutritional needs were being assessed and they were supported to eat and drink sufficiently.

Processes were in place that encouraged feedback from people who used the service, relatives, and visiting professionals. There was a complaints procedure in place and people knew how to make a complaint if they were unhappy with the service.

There was a system in place to manage complaints and use them to improve the service. There was an open and empowering culture in the service. Quality assurance processes were used to identify shortfalls and address them. As a result the service continued to improve.

 

 

Latest Additions: