Attention: The information on this website is currently out of date and should not be relied upon..

Care Services

carehome, nursing and medical services directory


Weston Business Centre, Colchester.

Weston Business Centre in Colchester is a Homecare agencies specialising in the provision of services relating to caring for adults over 65 yrs, caring for adults under 65 yrs, caring for children (0 - 18yrs), dementia, eating disorders, learning disabilities, mental health conditions, personal care, physical disabilities and sensory impairments. The last inspection date here was 14th September 2018

Weston Business Centre is managed by Mashdel Services Ltd.

Contact Details:

    Address:
      Weston Business Centre
      Hawkins Road
      Colchester
      CO2 8JX
      United Kingdom
    Telephone:
      07540433019

Ratings:

For a guide to the ratings, click here.

Safe: Good
Effective: Good
Caring: Good
Responsive: Good
Well-Led: Good
Overall: Good

Further Details:

Important Dates:

    Last Inspection 2018-09-14
    Last Published 2018-09-14

Local Authority:

    Essex

Link to this page:

    HTML   BBCode

Inspection Reports:

Click the title bar on any of the report introductions below to read the full entry. If there is a PDF icon, click it to download the full report.

1st August 2018 - During a routine inspection pdf icon

Weston Business Centre (also known as Mashdel Healthcare Services) is a domiciliary care agency. It provides personal care to people living in their own houses and flats in the community. It provides a service to older adults and younger disabled adults. People using the service lived in nine residential houses and ordinary flats across Colchester and the immediate surrounding areas.

Not everyone using Weston Business Centre receives personal care; CQC only inspects the service being received by people provided with ‘personal care’; help with tasks related to personal hygiene and eating. Where they do we also take into account any wider social care provided. At the time of the inspection the registered provider was providing support to nine people.

Following the last inspection on 29th June 2017 and 4th July 2017, we asked the provider to complete an action plan to show what they would do and by when to improve the key questions of safe and well led to at least good. At the last inspection we rated both these key questions as requires improvement and identified that the service was breaching regulation 18 as the registered person did not ensure there were sufficient numbers of suitably qualified, competent, skilled and experienced staff deployed in order to meet the provision of the regulated activity. There were not enough staff to ensure all peoples needs were met. This was predominantly noted with three out of 14 people who were receiving 24 hour care packages. Staff were working extremely long hours with no break. We additionally identified that a lack of effective management and a lack of oversight, with no registered manager did not fully ensure the service delivered was safe and continued to improve. This with particular relevance to the monitoring of staff working hours, Systems in place required developing to show how the service was moving forward.

During this comprehensive inspection we found improvements had been made in two key questions and have changed the rating for the domains 'Safe' and 'Well-led' to Good. We have kept the rating for 'Effective',' Caring' and 'Responsive' as Good. The overall rating for the service has improved and changed from ‘Requires Improvement’ to 'Good'.

A registered manager is now in post. A registered manager is a person who has registered with the Care Quality Commission (CQC) to manage the service. Like registered providers, they are ‘registered persons’. Registered persons have legal responsibility for meeting the requirements in the Health and Social Care Act and associated Regulations about how the service is run.

We found people who used the service were protected from the risk of harm and abuse because staff had received safeguarding training and they knew what to do should they have any concerns. Staff were recruited safely.

People received their medicines as prescribed and the registered manager had implemented procedures to ensure documentation relating to medicines was robust.

People who used the service had a wide range of support needs. Some people required support from the service 24 hours a day and other people were more independent and received support for just a few hours a day to help with their daily routines. There were enough staff to meet people's needs and new staff had recently been recruited to maintain appropriate numbers of staff.

People are supported to have maximum choice and control of their lives and staff do support them in the least restrictive way possible; the policies and systems in the service do support this practice. We found the registered manager and staff understood their responsibilities under the Mental Capacity Act 2005. They were aware of the need to gain consent when delivering care and support, and what to do if people lacked capacity to agree to it.

People's abilities to make decisions had been assessed and appropriate support had been provided to ensure that their views were taken into account when making decisions. Relati

29th June 2017 - During a routine inspection pdf icon

Mashdel Services is registered to provide personal care and support to people in their own homes. The inspection took place on 29th June 2017 and 4th July 2017 and was announced. At the time of our inspection, 14 people were using the service.

Mashdel Services had a registered manager in post who resigned from their post two weeks before our inspection. A new manager had been appointed but as yet was not registered. A registered manager is a person who has registered with the Care Quality Commission to manage the service. Like registered providers, they are 'registered persons'. Registered persons have legal responsibility for meeting the requirements in the Health and Social Care Act 2008 and associated Regulations about how the service is run.'

There were not enough staff to ensure all peoples needs were met. This was predominantly noticed with three out of 14 people who were receiving 24 hour care packages. Staff were working extremely long hours with no break.

Most people felt safe and were cared for by staff in way that promoted their dignity and met their needs. Staff knew how to identify and report concerns that affected people's health and wellbeing.

People were supported to take their medicines safely. People’s medication records were completed correctly and when needed written protocols were in place for example for when people required drugs for pain relief or had swallowing difficulties.

People were supported to eat and drink to maintain a balanced diet. People had a variety of choice and their dietary requirements were met.

Staff respected people's wishes and preferences in the way they delivered care. Where people were able, they were involved in the planning of their care. Staff understood how to support people who may not have capacity to make certain decisions about their care.

People were encouraged to follow their interests and were supported to take part in activities that they enjoyed.

The registered provider reviewed untoward incidents and accidents and looked for opportunities to improve practices. There were systems in place for handling and resolving complaints.

People were supported by staff that had been employed following appropriate recruitment checks. This ensured they were safe to work in health and social care settings. Staff recruited had the right values and skills to work with people who used the service. Staff received training and support which ensured they had the qualifications and skills to deliver good quality care to people.

The registered provider demonstrated a desire to provide good leadership to the staff team. Audits were completed to assess the quality of the service; however a lack of effective management and a lack of oversight did not fully ensure the service delivered was safe and continued to improve. This with particular relevance to the monitoring of staff working hours, Systems in place required developing to show how the service was moving forward.

You can see what action we told the provider to take at the back of the full version of the report summary.

 

 

Latest Additions: