Attention: The information on this website is currently out of date and should not be relied upon..

Care Services

carehome, nursing and medical services directory


Winray Care Housing, Church Lane Chambers, 11-12 Church Lane, London.

Winray Care Housing in Church Lane Chambers, 11-12 Church Lane, London is a Homecare agencies and Supported living specialising in the provision of services relating to caring for adults over 65 yrs, caring for adults under 65 yrs, dementia, learning disabilities, mental health conditions, personal care, physical disabilities and sensory impairments. The last inspection date here was 7th March 2019

Winray Care Housing is managed by Winray Care Housing who are also responsible for 1 other location

Contact Details:

    Address:
      Winray Care Housing
      Office 13
      Church Lane Chambers
      11-12 Church Lane
      London
      E11 1HG
      United Kingdom
    Telephone:
      02085392621
    Website:

Ratings:

For a guide to the ratings, click here.

Safe: Good
Effective: Good
Caring: Good
Responsive: Good
Well-Led: Good
Overall: Good

Further Details:

Important Dates:

    Last Inspection 2019-03-07
    Last Published 2019-03-07

Local Authority:

    Waltham Forest

Link to this page:

    HTML   BBCode

Inspection Reports:

Click the title bar on any of the report introductions below to read the full entry. If there is a PDF icon, click it to download the full report.

30th January 2019 - During a routine inspection pdf icon

About the service:

• Winray Care Housing is a care agency with three supported living schemes. It provides care and support to people in a supported living setting, specifically for people with learning disabilities. At the time of our inspection, the service was caring for seven people across three schemes. We visited one of these schemes as part of our inspection.

People’s experience of using this service:

• People were protected against avoidable harm, abuse, neglect and discrimination. The care people received was safe.

• People's risks were assessed, and plans put in place to reduce the risks.

• People's likes and dislikes were assessed and people’s needs were being met

• Relatives provided consistently positive feedback about the care, staff and management. They told us the service was caring.

• People's care was person-centred. The care was designed to ensure people's independence was encouraged.

• People and their relatives were involved in the care planning and review of their care.

• The service had a stable management structure. The provider had implemented systems to ensure they continuously measured the quality of the service.

• The service met the characteristics for a rating of "good" in all the key questions. Therefore, our overall rating for the service after this inspection was "good".

• More information is in our full report.

Rating at last inspection: Good (Report published 9 September 2016).

Why we inspected: This was a planned inspection based on the rating at the last inspection.

Follow up: We will continue to monitor the service through the information we receive.

3rd August 2016 - During a routine inspection pdf icon

We inspected Winray Care Housing on 3 and 5 August 2016. This was an announced inspection. We informed the provider 48 hours in advance of our visit that we would be inspecting. This was to ensure there was somebody at the location to facilitate our inspection.

Winray Care Housing is a care agency with three supported living schemes. It provides care and support to people in a supported living setting, specifically for people with learning disabilities. At the time of our inspection, the service was caring for seven people across three schemes. We visited one of these schemes as part of our inspection.

There was a registered manager in place at the time of our inspection. A registered manager is a person who has registered with the Care Quality Commission to manage the service. Like registered providers, they are 'registered persons'. Registered persons have legal responsibility for meeting the requirements in the Health and Social Care Act 2008 and associated Regulations about how the service is run.

Systems were in place to ensure that people using the service were safe. Care staff had undertaken training about safeguarding adults and had a good understanding about safeguarding principles and how to raise an alert.

Risk assessments were carried out and were robust and detailed. Risk assessments were updated in line with people’s changing needs.

Medicines were managed safely for people. Effective systems for the management, administration, storage, and disposal of medicines were in place.

Care staff were aware of their responsibilities under the Mental Capacity Act 2005 and how to ensure people using the service were given support to make decisions. Care staff were mindful of consent and ensuring that people were given autonomy and respect. The service was aware of its responsibility to inform CQC of any Deprivation of Liberty authorisations.

Care staff received relevant training to their role as well as an induction programme and we saw records of robust recruitment. Relevant checks had been carried out before staff commenced employment.

Staff appraisal, training, and supervision supported them in their role. Care staff understood best practice guidance and implemented them to meet the needs of people. The registered manager supported staff so that they were effective in their role to care for people and deliver quality care.

People had access to health care services to meet their needs and professional guidance was implemented to maintain their health. Referrals were made to health professionals when needed and visits to and from health professionals were recorded.

Care plans were detailed and person centred and people were involved in their care planning and decision making. Staff knew people well, were aware of their personal histories, and understood their likes and dislikes. Staff were aware of people’s communication needs and adapted their communication methods accordingly.

Care staff provided care and support to people in a way which respected their dignity and privacy and people using the service told us about ways in which this was upheld.

The registered manager for the service had a good relationship with staff and the people using the service and their relatives. There was open communications between all parties.

The service had quality assurance methods in place.

 

 

Latest Additions: